The Clinical Significance Of Circulating Mir-21, Mir-142, Mir-143, And Mir-146a In Patients With Prostate Cancer

Novel Markers of Prostate Cancer

Abstract


Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common type of solid tissue cancer among men in western countries. To enlighten the underlying molecular mechanisms in the pathophysiology of PCa and to help the development of new diagnostics and treatment models, we planned to determine the levels of circulating miR-21, miR-142, miR-143, miR-146a, and RNU 44 levels as controls for the early diagnosis of PCa. The circulating miRNA levels in peripheral blood samples from 43 localized PCa patients, 12 metastatic PCa (MET) patients, and as a control group, 42 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients with a total of 97 volunteers were determined the by PCR method. No differences in the ΔCT values were found among the groups. In PCa and PCaMet groups the expression of miR21 and miR142 were higher compared to the BHP group. No other differences were observed among the other groups. miR21 expression in the PCa group was 6.29 folds upregulated whereas in the PCaMet group 10.84 folds upregulated. When the total expression of miR142 is evaluated, it showed a positive correlation with mir21 and mir 146 (both p<0.001). Also, the expression of miR146 shows a positive correlation with both miR21 and miR143 (both p<0.001). Expression of miRNAs was found to be an independent diagnostic factor in patients with Gleason score, PSA, and free PSA levels. In conclusion, our study showed that co-expression of miR-21, miR-142, miR-143, and miR-146a and the upregulation of miR-21 resulted in increased prostate carcinoma cell growth. In the PCaMet group, miR21 is the most upregulated of all miRNAs. These miRNA markers that are expressed in different levels may provide a novel diagnostic tool to help diagnose PCa with aggressive behavior.

Author Biographies

İbrahim Murat, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Bülent Önal, Department of Urology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Department of Urology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Mutlu Adıgüzel, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Dildar Konukoğlu, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Cetin Demirdag, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul

Department of Urology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Eda Merve Kurtulus, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Fethi Ahmet Türegün, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul

Department of Urology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul

Hafize uzun, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Turkey.

 Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Published
2021/09/17
Section
Original paper