THE VALUE OF NIPT COMBINED WITH SERUM CELL-FREE DNA, ESTRIOL, AFP, AND b-HCG LEVELS IN THE RECOGNITION OF TRISOMY 21 AND 18 IN THE SECOND TRIMESTER
Abstract
目的: 评价无创DNA产前检测(NIPT)和血清三联征筛查在胎儿21和18三体检测中的临床应用价值。方法:作为回顾性分析,我们收集了1383名接受血清筛查和筛查的单身妊娠妇女的资料。 2015年5月至2017年9月在我科进行无创DNA产前检测(NIPT),并计算两种方法的诊断价值。结果: 在 1383 例病例中,血清筛查对 21 三体和 18 三体的敏感性为 76.9%,特异性为 74.7%,PPV 为 2.9%,NPV 为 99.7%,AUC 为 0.758(95% CI:0.625-0.891)。DNA (NIPT) 无创产前检测对 21 三体和 18 三体的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 99.8%,PPV 为 81%,NPV 为 100%,AUC 为 0.999(95% CI:0.000-1.000)。结论:血清筛查能及时发现高危孕妇,但假阳性和假阴性发生率高;DNA无创产前检测(NIPT)的准确性高,可以有效降低缺陷婴儿的发生率。
References
[2] Nicolaides KH, Spencer K, Avgidou K, et al. Multicenter study of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk-orientated two-stage first-trimester screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(3):221-6.
[3] Schreinemachers DM, Cross PK, Hook EB. Rates of trisomies 21, 18, 13 and other chromosome abnormalities in about 20 000 prenatal studies compared with estimated rates in live births. Hum Genet. 1982;61(4):318-24.
[4] Alldred SK, Takwoingi Y, Guo B, et al. First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3:CD012600.
[5] Wapner R, Thom E, Simpson JL, et al. First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 and 18. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;349(15):1405-13.
[6] Tu S, Rosenthal M, Wang D, et al. Performance of prenatal screening using maternal serum and ultrasound markers for Down syndrome in Chinese women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016;123 Suppl 3:12-22.
[7] Zhang X, Wang W, He F, et al. Proficiency testing of maternal serum prenatal screening in second trimester in China, 2015. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017;27(1):114-21.
[8] Mujezinovic F, Alfirevic Z. Procedure-related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(3):687-94.
[9] Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Knight GJ, et al. Reducing the need for amniocentesis in women 35 years of age or older with serum markers for screening. The New England journal of medicine. 1994;330(16):1114-8.
[10] Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, et al. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(1):16-26.
[11] Lo YM. Fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000; 906:141-7.
[12] Norton ME, Jacobsson B, Swamy GK, et al. Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy. The New England journal of medicine. 2015;372(17):1589-97.
[13] Manotaya S, Xu H, Uerpairojkit B, et al. Clinical experience from Thailand: noninvasive prenatal testing as screening tests for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in 4736 pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36(3):224-31.
[14] El Khattabi LA, Brun S, Gueguen P, et al. Performance of semiconductor sequencing platform for non-invasive prenatal genetic screening for fetal aneuploidy: results from a multicenter perspective cohort study in a clinical setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(2):246-54.
[15] Chiu RW, Akolekar R, Zheng YW, et al. Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study. BMJ. 2011;342:c7401.
[16] Lou S, Mikkelsen L, Hvidman L, et al. Does screening for Down's syndrome cause anxiety in pregnant women? A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(1):15-27.
[17] Zbucka-Kretowska M, Charkiewicz K, Czerniecki J, et al. Amniotic Fluid Angiogenic and Inflammatory Factor Profiling in Foetal Down Syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;44(1):44-50.
[18] Wald NJ, George L, Smith D, etal. Serum screening for Down's syndrome between 8 and 14 weeks of pregnancy. International Prenatal Screening Research Group. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103(5):407-12.
[19] Kagan KO, Valencia C, Livanos P, et al. Tricuspid regurgitation in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(1):18-22.
[20] Lefevre C, Gruchy N, Guenet D, et al. Immunoanalytical characteristics of unconjugated estriol: indications and analytical performances. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2016;74(6):717-23.
[21] Mackie FL, Hemming K, Allen S, et al. The accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017;124(1):32-46.
[22] Iwarsson E, Jacobsson B, Dagerhamn J, et al. Analysis of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal blood for detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 in a general pregnant population and in a high-risk population - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(1):7-18.
[23] Lo YM, Zhang J, Leung TN, et al. Rapid clearance of fetal DNA from maternal plasma. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64(1):218-24.
[24] Suzumori N, Ebara T, Yamada T, et al. Fetal cell-free DNA fraction in maternal plasma is affected by fetal trisomy. J Hum Genet. 2016;61(7):647-52.
[25] Chitty LS, Wright D, Hill M, et al. Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units. BMJ. 2016;354: i3426.
Copyright (c) 2023 JingLi Fu, XiaoYan Zhong, Dan Li, YunSheng Ge, XueQin Zhang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided and it is indicated if changes were made. Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in Journal of Medical Biochemistry and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.