Artificial Intelligence in the pre-analytical phase: state-of-the art and future perspectives
Artificial Intelligence in the pre-analytical phase
Abstract
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has become widespread in many areas of science and medicine, including laboratory medicine. Although it seems obvious that the analytical and post-analytical phases could be the most important fields of application in laboratory medicine, a kaleidoscope of new opportunities has emerged to extend the benefits of AI to many manual labor-intensive activities belonging to the pre-analytical phase, which are inherently characterized by enhanced vulnerability and higher risk of errors. These potential applications involve increasing the appropriateness of test prescription (with computerized physician order entry or demand management tools), improved specimen collection (using active patient recognition, automated specimen labeling, vein recognition and blood collection assistance, along with automated blood drawing), more efficient sample transportation (facilitated by the use of pneumatic transport systems or drones, and monitored with smart blood tubes or data loggers), systematic evaluation of sample quality (by measuring serum indices, fill volume or for detecting sample clotting), as well as error detection and analysis. Therefore, this opinion paper aims to discuss the state-of-the-art and some future possibilities of AI in the preanalytical phase.
References
1. Oxford Dictionary. Artificial Intelligence. Available at: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/artificial-intelligence?q=artificial+intelligence. Last accessed, 8 August 2023.
2. Negrini D, Lippi G. Generative Artificial Intelligence in (laboratory) medicine: friend or foe? Biochim Clin. 2023. Doi: 10.19186/BC_2023.025.
3. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Project Management in Laboratory Medicine. J Med Biochem 2019;38:401-6.
4. Padoan A, Plebani M. Artificial intelligence: is it the right time for clinical laboratories? Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:1859-61.
5. Lippi G, von Meyer A, Cadamuro J, Simundic AM. Blood sample quality. Diagnosis (Berl) 2019;6:25-31.
6. Mohammed S, Ule Priebbenow V, Pasalic L, Favaloro EJ. Development and implementation of an expert rule set for automated reflex testing and validation of routine coagulation tests in a large pathology network. Int J Lab Hematol 2019;41:642-9.
7. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. The biomarker paradigm: between diagnostic efficiency and clinical efficacy. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2015;125:282-8.
8. Lippi G, Bovo C, Ciaccio M. Inappropriateness in laboratory medicine: an elephant in the room? Ann Transl Med 2017;5:82.
9. Cadamuro J, Ibarz M, Cornes M, Nybo M, Haschke-Becher E, von Meyer A, et al. Managing inappropriate utilization of laboratory resources. Diagnosis (Berl) 2019;6:5-13.
10. Khanna R, Yen T. Computerized physician order entry: promise, perils, and experience. Neurohospitalist 2014;4:26-33.
11. Favaloro EJ, Kershaw G, Mohammed S, Lippi G. How to Optimize Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) Testing: Solutions to Establishing and Verifying Normal Reference Intervals and Assessing APTT Reagents for Sensitivity to Heparin, Lupus Anticoagulant, and Clotting Factors. Semin Thromb Hemost 2019;45:22-35.
12. Carobene A, Cabitza F, Bernardini S, Gopalan R, Lennerz JK, Weir C, et al. Where is laboratory medicine headed in the next decade? Partnership model for efficient integration and adoption of artificial intelligence into medical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;61:535-43.
13. Lippi G, Brambilla M, Bonelli P, Aloe R, Balestrino A, Nardelli A, et al. Effectiveness of a computerized alert system based on re-testing intervals for limiting the inappropriateness of laboratory test requests. Clin Biochem 2015;48:1174-6.
14. Delvaux N, Piessens V, Burghgraeve T, Mamouris P, Vaes B, Stichele RV, et al. Clinical decision support improves the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care without increasing diagnostic error: the ELMO cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci 2020;15:100.
15. Kumar A, Yuvaraj D, Kaur R, Kayathri S, Dhamotharan KA, Patil N. Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Biochemistry Is Designed To Prevent Unnecessary Routine Testing In the Pre-Analytic Phase. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci 2022;11:207-12.
16. Plebani M, Lippi G. Closing the brain-to-brain loop in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1131-3.
17. Ialongo C, Bernardini S. Phlebotomy, a bridge between laboratory and patient. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2016;26:17-33.
18. Lippi G, Chiozza L, Mattiuzzi C, Plebani M. Patient and Sample Identification. Out of the Maze? J Med Biochem 2017;36:107-12.
19. Mason J, Dave R, Chatterjee P, Graham-Allen I, Esterline A, Roy K. An Investigation of Biometric Authentication in the Healthcare Environment. Array 2020;8:100042.
20. Clark M. Top Five Biometrics (Face, Fingerprint, Iris, Palm and Voice) Modalities Comparison. Bayometric 2023. Available at: https://www.bayometric.com/biometrics-face-finger-iris-palm-voice/. Last accessed, August 8, 2023.
21. Lippi G, Plebani M. Blood tubes should be labeled before drawing blood. Ann Blood 2017;2:18.
22. Favaloro EJ. Blood tubes should be appropriately labelled and checked by the patient before departure. Ann Blood 2018;3.
23. Godolphin W, Bodtker K, Uyeno D, Goh LO. Automated blood-sample handling in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem 1990;36:1551-5.
24. Piva E, Tosato F, Plebani M. Pre-analytical phase: The automated ProTube device supports quality assurance in the phlebotomy process. Clin Chim Acta 2015;451:287-91.
25. Lippi G, Ferrari A, Gaino S, Caruso B, Bassi A, Bovo C. Preanalytical errors before and after implementation of an automatic blood tube labeling system in two outpatient phlebotomy centers. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:e217-9.
26. Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Picheth G, Guidi GC. Laboratory Diagnostics and Quality of Blood Collection. J Med Biochem 2015;34:288-94.
27. Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Manguera CL, Sumita NM, et al. New ways to deal with known preanalytical issues: use of transilluminator instead of tourniquet for easing vein access and eliminating stasis on clinical biochemistry. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2011;21:152-9.
28. Stolz LA, Stolz U, Howe C, Farrell IJ, Adhikari S. Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Vasc Access 2015;16:321-6.
29. Firooz M, Karkhah S, Hosseini SJ. The effect of transilluminator device on successful peripheral venous catheter placement in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Access. 2022 Oct 26:11297298221132866. Doi: 10.1177/11297298221132866. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36287005.
30. Bramhe S, Pathak SS. Robotic Surgery: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2022;14:e29179.
31. Zivanovic A, Davies BL. A robotic system for blood sampling. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2000;4:8-14.
32. Lippi G, Cadamuro J. Novel Opportunities for Improving the Quality of Preanalytical Phase. A Glimpse to the Future? J Med Biochem 2017;36:293-300.
33. He T, Guo C, Liu H, Jiang L. Research on Robotic Humanoid Venipuncture Method Based on Biomechanical Model. J Intell Robot Syst 2022;106:31.
34. He T, Guo C, Liu H, Jiang L. A venipuncture robot with decoupled position and attitude guided by near-infrared vision and force feedback. Int J Med Robot 2023;19:e2512.
35. Leipheimer JM, Balter ML, Chen AI, Pantin EJ, Davidovich AE, Labazzo KS, et al. First-in-human evaluation of a hand-held automated venipuncture device for rapid venous blood draws. Technology (Singap World Sci) 2019;7:98-107.
36. Balter ML, Leipheimer JM, Chen AI, Shrirao A, Maguire TJ, Yarmush ML. Automated end-to-end blood testing at the point-of-care: Integration of robotic phlebotomy with downstream sample processing. Technology (Singap World Sci) 2018;6:59-66.
37. Xing J, Loureiro J, Patel MT, Mikhailov D, Gusev AI. Evaluation of a novel blood microsampling device for clinical trial sample collection and protein biomarker analysis. Bioanalysis 2020;12:919-35.
38. Zarbl J, Eimer E, Gigg C, Bendzuck G, Korinth M, Elling-Audersch C, et al. Remote self-collection of capillary blood using upper arm devices for autoantibody analysis in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases. RMD Open 2022;8:e002641.
39. Chen Y, Wang Q, Chi C, Wang C, Gao Q, Zhang H, et al. A collaborative robot for COVID-19 oropharyngeal swabbing. Rob Auton Syst 2022;148:103917.
40. Li C, Gu X, Xiao X, Lim CM, Duan X, Ren H. A Flexible Transoral Robot Towards COVID-19 Swab Sampling. Front Robot AI 2021;8:612167.
41. Hu Y, Li J, Chen Y, Wang Q, Chi C, Zhang H, et al. Design and Control of a Highly Redundant Rigid-flexible Coupling Robot to Assist the COVID-19 Oropharyngeal-Swab Sampling. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2021;7:1856-63.
42. Nybo M, Cadamuro J, Cornes MP, Gómez Rioja R, Grankvist K. Sample transportation - an overview. Diagnosis (Berl) 2019;6:39-43.
43. Plebani M, Zaninotto M. Pneumatic tube delivery systems for patient samples: evidence of quality and quality of evidence. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1245-6.
44. Nybo M, Lund ME, Titlestad K, Maegaard CU. Blood Sample Transportation by Pneumatic Transportation Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. Clin Chem 2018;64:782-90.
45. Kumari S, Kumar S, Bharti N, Shekhar R. Impact of Pneumatic Transport System on Preanalytical Phase Affecting Clinical Biochemistry Results. J Lab Physicians 2022;15:48-55.
46. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Biological samples transportation by drones: ready for prime time? Ann Transl Med 2016;4:92.
47. Plebani M. Drone transport of biological samples: an open issue. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1745-6.
48. Zhang J, Tian GY, Marindra AM, Sunny AI, Zhao AB. A Review of Passive RFID Tag Antenna-Based Sensors and Systems for Structural Health Monitoring Applications. Sensors (Basel) 2017;17:265.
49. El Khamlichi M, Alvarez Melcon A, El Mrabet O, Ennasar MA, Hinojosa J. Flexible UHF RFID Tag for Blood Tubes Monitoring. Sensors (Basel) 2019;19:4903.
50. Caredda V, Orrù PF, Romagnoli G, Volpi A, Zedda F. RFID technology for blood tracking: An experimental approach for benchmarking different devices. Int J RF Technol 2016;7:209-28.
51. Arshavsky-Graham S, Segal E. Lab-on-a-Chip Devices for Point-of-Care Medical Diagnostics. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2022;179:247-65.
52. Sánchez S. Lab-in-a-tube systems as ultra-compact devices. Lab Chip 2015;15:610-3.
53. Veillette M, Tourangeau F, Fafard J, Dumaresq J, Labbé AC; G-SPIT study group. Clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 detection on the cobas Liat using water gargle samples. J Clin Virol Plus 2022;2:100108.
54. Zaninotto M, Tasinato A, Padoan A, Vecchiato G, Pinato A, Sciacovelli L, et al. An integrated system for monitoring the quality of sample transportation. Clin Biochem 2012;45:688-90.
55. Lippi G, Cadamuro J. Visual assessment of sample quality: quo usque tandem? Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:513-5.
56. Lippi G. Systematic Assessment of the Hemolysis Index: Pros and Cons. Adv Clin Chem 2015;71:157-70.
57. Lippi G, Cadamuro J, von Meyer A, Simundic AM; European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Practical recommendations for managing hemolyzed samples in clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:718-27.
58. Simundic AM, Baird G, Cadamuro J, Costelloe SJ, Lippi G. Managing hemolyzed samples in clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2020;57:1-21.
59. von Meyer A, Cadamuro J, Lippi G, Simundic AM. Call for more transparency in manufacturers declarations on serum indices: On behalf of the Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE), European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). Clin Chim Acta 2018;484:328-32.
60. Favaloro EJ, Lippi G, Adcock DM. Preanalytical and postanalytical variables: The leading causes of diagnostic error in haemostasis? Semin Thromb Hemost 2008;34:612-34.
61. Lippi G, Dima F, Tosi M, Carpenè G, Celegon G, Favaloro EJ, et al. Incomplete filling of spray-dried K2EDTA evacuated blood tubes: impact on measuring routine hematological parameters on Sysmex XN-10. Diagnosis (Berl). 2023 Jul 24. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0064.
62. Lippi G, Banfi G, Church S, Cornes M, De Carli G, Grankvist K, et al; European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group for Preanalytical Phase. Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:357-70.
63. Lippi G, Plebani M, Favaloro EJ. Technological advances in the hemostasis laboratory. Semin Thromb Hemost 2014;40:178-85.
64. Fang K, Dong Z, Chen X, Zhu J, Zhang B, You J, et al. Using machine learning to identify clotted specimens in coagulation testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1289-97.
65. Plebani M, Lippi G. Improving diagnosis and reducing diagnostic errors: the next frontier of laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1117-8.
66. Cadamuro J, Lippi G, von Meyer A, Ibarz M, van Dongen Lasses E, Cornes M, et al. European survey on preanalytical sample handling - Part 1: How do European laboratories monitor the preanalytical phase? On behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2019;29:020704.
67. Lippi G, Sciacovelli L, Simundic AM, Plebani M. Innovative software for recording preanalytical errors in accord with the IFCC quality indicators. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:e51-3.
68. An Q, Rahman S, Zhou J, Kang JJ. A Comprehensive Review on Machine Learning in Healthcare Industry: Classification, Restrictions, Opportunities and Challenges. Sensors (Basel) 2023;23:4178.
Copyright (c) 2023 Giuseppe Lippi, Camilla Mattiuzzi, Emmanuel J. Favaloro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided and it is indicated if changes were made. Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in Journal of Medical Biochemistry and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.