Exploring the Pathogen Diagnosis and Prognostic Factors of Severe COVID-19 Using Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing: A Retrospective Study

ESR1 and MMP3 Profiles Predict Prostate Cancer Recurrence Risk

  • Weizhong Zeng
  • Yanchao Liang
  • Xiaoyuan He
  • Fangwei Chen
  • Jiali Xiong
  • Zhenhua Wen
  • Liang Tang
  • Xun Chen Zhuzhou Central Hospital
  • Juan Zhang
Keywords: Pathogens, mNGS, Conventional Pathogen Test, APACHCE-II, SOFA

Abstract


Background: This study aimed to identify pathogens and factors that predict the outcome of severe COVID-19 by utilizing metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 56 severe COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital between December 2022 and March 2023. We analyzed the pathogen types and strains detected through mNGS and conventional microbiological testing and collected general patient information.

Results: In this study, 42 pathogens were detected using mNGS and conventional microbiological testing. mNGS had a significantly higher detection rate of 90.48% compared to 71.43% for conventional testing (P=0.026). A total of 196 strains were detected using both methods, with a significantly higher detection rate of 70.92% for mNGS compared to 49.49% for conventional testing (P=0.000). The 56 patients were divided into a survival group (33 cases) and a death group (23 cases) based on clinical outcomes. The survival group had significantly lower age, number of pathogens detected by mNGS, number of pathogens detected by conventional testing, APACHE-II score, SOFA score, high-sensitivity troponin, creatine kinase-MB subtype, and lactate dehydrogenase compared to the death group (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that these factors were risk factors for mortality in severe COVID-19 patients (P<0.05). In contrast, ROC curve analysis revealed that these factors had diagnostic values for mortality, with AUC values ranging from 0.657 to 0.963. The combined diagnosis of these indicators had an AUC of 0.924.

Conclusion: The use of mNGS technology can significantly enhance the detection of pathogens in severe cases of COVID-19 and also has a solid ability to predict clinical outcomes.

References

1. Meduri GU, Shih MC, Bridges L, Martin TJ, El-Solh A, Seam N, et al. Low-dose methylprednisolone treatment in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Intens Care Med 2022; 48(8): 1009-23.
2. Chen X, Cao K, Wei Y, Qian Y, Liang J, Dong D, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of severe pneumonias caused by Chlamydia psittaci. Infection 2020; 48(4): 535-42.
3. Wu X, Li Y, Zhang M, Li M, Zhang R, Lu X, et al. Etiology of Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults Based on Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Infect Dis Ther 2020; 9(4): 1003-15.
4. Li H, Hao B, Wang Y, Yu D, Chen Z, Du D, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia. Clin Respir J 2022; 16(7): 513-21.
5. Zhang Q, Li S, Zhou W, Zheng L, Ren Y, Dong L, et al. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) combined with rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSCE) for the diagnosis of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia. Int J Clin Exp Patho 2021; 14(4): 389-98.
6. Cuetero-Martinez Y, de Los CD, Aguirre-Garrido JF, Lopez-Vidal Y, Noyola A. Next-generation Sequencing for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance and Pathogenicity in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants. Curr Med Chem 2022; 30(1): 5-29.
7. Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. Jama-J Am Med Assoc 2020; 324(8): 782-93.
8. Ruan X, Li M, Qin X. Diagnostic Value of Metagenomic Next Generation Sequencing for Ureaplasma urealyticum Infection: A Case Report. Lab Med 2022; 53(4): e74-6.
9. Kanellakis NI, Wrightson JM, Gerry S, Ilott N, Corcoran JP, Bedawi EO, et al. The bacteriology of pleural infection (TORPIDS): an exploratory metagenomics analysis through next generation sequencing. Lancet Microbe 2022; 3(4): e294-302.
10. Jia X, Zhang X, Ling Y, Zhang X, Tian D, Liao Y, et al. Application of nanopore sequencing in diagnosis of secondary infections in patients with severe COVID-19. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2021; 50(6): 748-54.
11. Han SY. Clinical value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in complicated infectious diseases. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi 2022; 24(2): 210-5.
12. Edward P, Handel AS. Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Infectious Disease Diagnosis: A Review of the Literature With a Focus on Pediatrics. J Pediat Inf Dis Soc 2021; 10(Supplement_4): S71-7.
13. Jing C, Chen H, Liang Y, Zhong Y, Wang Q, Li L, et al. Clinical Evaluation of an Improved Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Test for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections. Clin Chem 2021; 67(8): 1133-43.
14. Li S, Tong J, Liu Y, Shen W, Hu P. Targeted next generation sequencing is comparable with metagenomic next generation sequencing in adults with pneumonia for pathogenic microorganism detection. J Infection 2022; 85(5): e127-9.
15. Kanaujia R, Biswal M, Angrup A, Ray P. Diagnostic accuracy of the metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for detection of bacterial meningoencephalitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol 2022; 41(6): 881-91.
16. Xie D, Xu W, You J, Yuan X, Li M, Bi X, et al. Clinical descriptive analysis of severe Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in renal transplantation recipients. Bioengineered 2021; 12(1): 1264-72.
17. Luo RB, Huang M, Hu H, Zhang R, Han CM. [Microbiological characteristics of patients with severe burns caused by blast and application of meta- genomics next-generation sequencing in the detection of pathogenic microorganisms]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi 2021; 37(10): 946-52.
18. Chiu CY, Miller SA. Clinical metagenomics. Nat Rev Genet 2019; 20(6): 341-55.
19. Wang L, Lin C, Qi Y. Gestational psittacosis causes severe pneumonia and miscarriage: A case report and literature review. Radiol Case Rep 2023; 18(5): 1959-62.
20. Zhao ZL, Tang X, He CW, Liu YL, Li XY, Wang R, et al. [Clinical characteristics and outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by severe Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu XI Za Zhi 2022; 45(10): 1015-21.
21. Hong L, Chen Y, Ye L. Characteristics of the lung microbiota in lower respiratory tract infections with and without history of pneumonia. Bioengineered 2021; 12(2): 10480-90.
22. Miao Q, Ma Y, Ling Y, Jin W, Su Y, Wang Q, et al. Evaluation of superinfection, antimicrobial usage, and airway microbiome with metagenomic sequencing in COVID-19 patients: A cohort study in Shanghai. J Microbiol Immunol 2021; 54(5): 808-15.
23. Peng JM, Du B, Qin HY, Wang Q, Shi Y. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of suspected pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. J Infection 2021; 82(4): 22-7.
24. Li Y, Sun B, Tang X, Liu YL, He HY, Li XY, et al. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for bronchoalveolar lavage diagnostics in critically ill patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol 2020; 39(2): 369-74.
Published
2024/04/30
Section
Original paper