Clinical Utility of Jugular Venous Blood Gas Biomarkers for Assessing Traumatic Brain Injury Severity and Predicting ICU Stay Duration: A Biochemical and Predictive Modeling Approach
JVBG in Cranial Brain Injury
Abstract
Background: Biochemical monitoring of cerebral oxygen metabolism is essential in the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Jugular venous blood gas (JVBG) analysis provides real-time data reflecting cerebral biochemical states, offering a valuable window into brain oxygenation and metabolic demands. This study aimed to evaluate JVBG biochemical markers as indicators of TBI severity and as predictors of prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, emphasizing their integration into machine learning models for clinical utility.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 ICU-admitted TBI patients. Serial measurements of JVBG parameters—jugular venous oxygen saturation (SjvO₂), partial pressure of oxygen (PjO₂), arteriovenous oxygen difference (AVDO₂), and oxygen content difference (AVDL)—were performed over five days. Spearman correlation and random forest algorithms were employed to assess relationships between JVBG biomarkers, clinical severity (via Glasgow Coma Scale), and ICU duration.
Results: Patients with more severe TBI exhibited significantly reduced SjvO₂ and PjO₂, and elevated AVDO₂ and AVDL (p < 0.001). Strong correlations were found between JVBG markers and clinical severity scores. A multivariable prediction model incorporating age, SaO₂, and PaCO₂ at one day post-admission yielded excellent predictive performance for prolonged ICU stay (AUC = 0.974; sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 94.8%).
Conclusion: JVBG biomarkers serve as clinically informative biochemical indicators for assessing TBI severity and forecasting ICU duration. Their integration into predictive algorithms may enhance precision in neurocritical care and support biochemical decision-making in intensive care settings.
References
2. Lindblad C, Raj R, Zeiler FA, Thelin EP. Current state of high-fidelity multimodal monitoring in traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir 2022; 164(12): 3091-100.
3. Dimitri GM, Beqiri E, Placek MM, Czosnyka M, Stocchetti N, Ercole A, et al. Modeling Brain-Heart Crosstalk Information in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurocrit Care 2022; 36(3): 738-50.
4. Reed J, Grillakis A, Kline A, Ahmed AE, Byrnes KR. Gait analysis in a rat model of traumatic brain injury. Behav Brain Res 2021; 405: 113210.
5. Wang S, Zhu K, Hou X, Hou L. The association of traumatic brain injury, gut microbiota and the corresponding metabolites in mice. Brain Res 2021; 1762: 147450.
6. La Rocca M, Barisano G, Garner R, Ruf SF, Amoroso N, Monti M, et al. Functional connectivity alterations in traumatic brain injury patients with late seizures. Neurobiol Dis 2023; 179: 106053.
7. Boyko M, Gruenbaum BF, Shelef I, Zvenigorodsky V, Severynovska O, Binyamin Y, et al. Traumatic brain injury-induced submissive behavior in rats: link to depression and anxiety. Transl Psychiat 2022; 12(1): 239.
8. Korley F, Pauls Q, Yeatts SD, Jones C, Corbett-Valade E, Silbergleit R, et al. Progesterone Treatment Does Not Decrease Serum Levels of Biomarkers of Glial and Neuronal Cell Injury in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Subjects: A Secondary Analysis of the Progesterone for Traumatic Brain Injury, Experimental Clinical Treatment (ProTECT) III Trial. J Neurotraum 2021; 38(14): 1953-60.
9. Malik S, Alnaji O, Malik M, Gambale T, Rathbone MP. Correlation between Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Inflammatory Cytokines and Emotional Symptom Traits: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci 2022; 12(1): 102.
10. Zhang Y, Li L, He L. Radiological-prognostic correlation of diffusion tensor imaging in a mild traumatic brain injury model. Exp Ther Med 2020; 20(6): 256.
11. Bazan VM, Taylor EM, Gunn TM, Zwischenberger JB. Overview of the bicaval dual lumen cannula. Indian J Thorac Card 2021; 37(Suppl 2): 232-40.
12. Guven M, Akilli NB, Koylu R, Oner V, Guven M, Ozer MR. A new marker identification of high risk stroke patients: Jugular saturation. Am J Emerg Med 2020; 38(1): 7-11.
13. Wei S, Cheng X, Li J, Zhai K, Huang J, Wang S, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improves survival in a rat model of acute myocardial infarction. Artif Organs 2023; 47(7): 1163-73.
14. Del PC, Lanci A, Cocchia N, Freccero F, Di Maio C, Castagnetti C, et al. Venous blood gas parameters, electrolytes, glucose and lactate concentration in sick neonatal foals: Direct venipuncture versus push-pull technique. Equine Vet J 2021; 53(3): 488-94.
15. Nelson C, Constable PD, Connolly SL. Comparison of selected serum biochemistry measurements between the Nova Prime Plus VET, Nova pHOx Ultra, and Beckman Coulter AU680 analyzers in dogs. Vet Clin Path 2021; 50(3): 327-41.
16. Pinto PJ, Ghaye B, Laterre PF, Hantson P. Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome in a postoperative patient: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2021; 15(1): 600.
17. Koziatek CA, Idowu D, White R. A Rare Malposition of a Left Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheter into the Left Internal Mammary Vein. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med 2023; 7(1): 51-3.
18. Yuksel ME, Izdes S, Aydar I, Kasikci M. Can expected pCO2 be calculated by pCO2=HCO3+15 formula in central venous blood gas samples? Eur Rev Med Pharmaco 2022; 26(19): 6985-9.
19. Sgorbini M, Freccero F, Castagnetti C, Mariella J, Lanci A, Marmorini P, et al. Peripartum findings and blood gas analysis in newborn foals born after spontaneous or induced parturition. Theriogenology 2020; 158: 18-23.
20. Kadwa AR, Boustead KJ, Zeiler GE. Agreement between arterial and central venous blood pH and its contributing variables in anaesthetized dogs with respiratory acidosis. Vet Anaesth Analg 2022; 49(3): 299-303.
21. Grange R, Sharma R, Shah H, Reinstadler B, Goldberger O, Cooper MK, et al. Hypoxia ameliorates brain hyperoxia and NAD(+) deficiency in a murine model of Leigh syndrome. Mol Genet Metab 2021; 133(1): 83-93.
22. Lu H, Gong Z, Song Y, Jiang R. Application of P(jv-a) CO(2) in monitoring cerebral oxygen supply-demand balance in injured brain. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 71: 213-6.
23. Ho K, Peng YW, Ye M, Tchouta L, Schneider B, Hayes M, et al. Evaluation of an Anti-Thrombotic Continuous Lactate and Blood Pressure Monitoring Catheter in an In Vivo Piglet Model undergoing Open-Heart Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Chemosensors 2020; 8(3): 56.
24. Bunya N, Aisaka W, Miyata K, Narimatsu E, Yamashita S, Kuroda Y, et al. Prognostic Significance of the Difference Between Mixed and Jugular Venous Oxygen Saturation After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Brain Hypothermia Study. World Neurosurg 2020; 137: e68-74.
25. Halbgebauer R, Halbgebauer S, Oeckl P, Steinacker P, Weihe E, Schafer MK, et al. Neurochemical Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury by the Combined Analysis of Plasma Beta-Synuclein, NfL, and GFAP in Polytraumatized Patients. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23(17): 9639.
26. Brothers RO, Bitarafan S, Pybus AF, Wood LB, Buckley EM. Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury. Jove-J Vis Exp 2022; (183):
27. Roldan M, Abay TY, Kyriacou PA. Non-Invasive Techniques for Multimodal Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Neurotraum 2020; 37(23): 2445-53.
28. Sekhon MS, Ainslie PN, Menon DK, Thiara SS, Cardim D, Gupta AK, et al. Brain Hypoxia Secondary to Diffusion Limitation in Hypoxic Ischemic Brain Injury Postcardiac Arrest. Crit Care Med 2020; 48(3): 378-84.
29. Hagglund L, Olivecrona M, Koskinen LD. Correlation of Cerebral and Subcutaneous Glycerol in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury and Association with Tissue Damage. Neurocrit Care 2022; 36(3): 993-1001.
30. Ackert L, Boysen SR, Schiller T. A pilot study comparing bone marrow aspirates and venous blood for emergency point-of-care blood parameters in healthy dogs. J Vet Emerg Crit Car 2019; 29(4): 399-406.
Copyright (c) 2025 Bin Qi, Wenjie Du, He Zhang, Yuhui Jiang, Ming Zhuo, Haixia Xu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided and it is indicated if changes were made. Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in Journal of Medical Biochemistry and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
