The Title: A Tripartite Biomarker Panel of Systemic Inflammation, Immune Activation, and Tubular Injury (IL-6, suPAR, KIM-1) Predicts Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in End-Stage Renal Disease

A Tripartite Biomarker Panel of Systemic Inflammation, Immune Activation, and Tubular Injury

  • Tong Li 1Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, 518033 Shenzhen city, Guangdong province, China
Keywords: End-stage renal disease, Hemodialysis, Biomarkers, Interleukin-6, Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, Kidney Injury Molecule-1, Prognosis, Cardiovascular disease.

Abstract


Background: The high mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is driven by a confluence of inflammatory, cardiovascular, and persistent tubulointerstitial injury pathways. We hypothesized that a multi-domain biomarker panel combining Interleukin-6 (IL-6, inflammation), soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR, immune activation), and Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1, tubular injury) would provide superior prognostic value for fatal and non-fatal outcomes.
Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of 538 prevalent hemodialysis patients. Serum IL-6, suPAR, and KIM-1 were measured at baseline. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalizations. Cox proportional hazards models and C-statistics were used for analysis.
Results: Over a median follow-up of 36 months, 192 patients (35.7%) experienced the primary composite endpoint. In fully adjusted models, each biomarker independently predicted the primary endpoint: IL-6 (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.51-2.26), suPAR (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.70-2.73), and KIM-1 (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.35-2.06). A model containing all three biomarkers demonstrated significantly improved discrimination (C-index 0.81) over models with any single biomarker (C-indices 0.71-0.74) or a clinical model alone (C-index 0.67; p<0.001). Patients in the highest risk category (all three biomarkers in top tertiles) had a 6.8-fold increased risk (HR 6.80, 95% CI 3.85-12.02) for the primary endpoint.
Conclusion: The combination of IL-6, suPAR, and KIM-1—reflecting systemic inflammation, innate immunity, and residual tubular damage—creates a powerful, integrative prognostic tool that significantly improves risk stratification for mortality and cardiovascular events in ESRD.

References

1. Sarnak MJ, Amann K, Bangalore S, et al. Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(14):1823-1838.
2. Carrero JJ, Stenvinkel P, Cuppari L, et al. Etiology of the protein-energy wasting syndrome in chronic kidney disease: a consensus statement from the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM). J Ren Nutr. 2013;23(2):77-90.
3. Zoccali C, Vanholder R, Massy ZA, et al. The systemic nature of CKD. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(6):344-358.
4. Gupta J, Mitra N, Kanetsky PA, et al. Association between albuminuria, kidney function, and inflammatory biomarker profile in CKD in CRIC. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7(12):1938-1946.
5. Ridker PM, Rane M. Interleukin-6 Signaling and Anti-Interleukin-6 Therapeutics in Cardiovascular Disease. Circ Res. 2021;128(11):1728-1746.
6. Hayek SS, Sever S, Ko YA, e
Published
2026/02/24
Section
Original paper