The Logic of Practicality: An Inquiry into the Nature of the EU’s Practice of International Peace Mediation
Sažetak
In the paper, the authors use the practice approach to untangle the nature of the EU’s practice of international peace mediation (IPM). Drawing on the recent practice turn in international relations scholarship, Bourdieu’s well-known concept of habitus is employed in order to elicit the background knowledge and values that constitute and transform this practice. In this regard, the EU’s practice of international peace mediation is examined through the lens of general peace mediation norms, as well as through the rules, norms, identity and culture that are specific to the European Union. Three cases are used for this endeavor: (1) the EU support for the Aceh peace process in Indonesia (2004–2008); (2) the EU engagement in the Russian- Georgian war (2008–2012); and (3) the mediating role which the EU has undertaken in the recent dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia (2011–2013).
Reference
Adler, Emanuel. 2008. „The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post–Cold War Transformation.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (2): 195–230.
Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot, eds. 2011a. International Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. 2011b. “International Practices”. International Theory 3 (1): 1–36.
Ashley, Richard. 1987. “The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics”. Alternatives 12 (4): 403–34.
Beardsley, Kyle C., David M. Quinn, Bidisha Biswas, and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 2006. “Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (1): 58–86.
Bercovitch, Jacob. 2009. “Mediation and International Conflict Resolution: Analyzing Structure and Behavior.” In Handbook of Conflict Analyses and Resolution, edited by. Dennis J. D. Sandole, Sean Byrne, Ingrid Snadole-Staroste and Jessica Senehi. New York: Roudledge.
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Scott Sigmund Gartner. 2007. “Is There Method in the Madness of Mediation.” International Interactions 32 (4): 329–54.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Esquisse D’une Théorie De La Pratique, Précédé De Trois Études D’éthnologie Kabyl. Paris: Senil.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. Questions De Sociologie. Paris: Minuit.
Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. 1992. Report of the Secretary-General. 31 January. “An Agenda for Peace, Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-Keeping.” Accessed 23 July 2013. http://www.unrol.org/files/A_47_277.pdf
Bueger, Chrisian. 2014. “Pathways to Practice: Praxiography and International Politics.” European Political Science Review 6 (1): 1–14.
Bueger, Chrisian. 2011. “The Clash of Practice: Political Controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding Commision.” Evidence and Policy 7 (2): 171–91.
Corradi, Gessica, Silvia Gherardi, and Luca Verzelloni. 2010. “Through the Practice Lens: Where Is the Bandwagon of Practice-Based Studies Heading?”. Management Learning 41 (3): 265–83.
http://www.eu-un.europa.eu/articles/fr/article_11181_fr.htm
Council of the European Union. Press 443 (17410/11). 21–22 November 2011. Accessed 6 August 2013. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/ pressdata/EN/foraff/126265.pdf
Derian, James Der. 1987. On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. Oxford: Blackwell.
Derian, James Der, and Michael J. Shapiro, eds. 1989. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Lexington: MA : Lexington Books.
Doty, R. L. 1996. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Mineapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
ECDPM. 2011. “Study on Eu Lessons Learnt in Mediation and Dialogue: Glass Half Full.” Brussels: European Center for Development Menagment.
European Commission. 2012. “Joint statement of High Representative/Vice President Catherine Ashton and Commissioner Štefan Füle on the agreements reached in the latest round of Belgrade-Pristina dialogue”, Brussels, 24 February. Accessed 26 February 2014.
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-12-133_en.htm?locale=en
Gourlay, Catriona. 2011. “Background Paper: The European Union as Peacemaker- Enhancing EU Mediation Capacity.” Brussels: European Policy Center.
Grevi, Giovani. 2007. “Pioneering Foreign Policy. The EU Special Representatives.” Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
Grono, Magdalena Frichova. 2010. “Georgia’s Conflicts: What Role for the EU as Mediator?” London: Initiative for Peacebuilding.
Hansen, Lene. 2011. “Performing Practices: A Poststructuralist Analyses of the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 280–309. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Herrberg, Antje. June 2012a. “Communicate, Coordinate and Cooperate, Cohering Crisis Management in the Post-Lisbon Era.” Brussels: International Security Information Service, Europe.
Herrberg, Antje. June 2012b. “International Peace Mediation: A New Crossroad for the European Union.” Brussels: International Security Information Service, Europe.
Herrberg, Antje, Canan Gunduz, and Laura Davis. May 2009. “Engaging the EU in Mediation and Dialogue: Reflections and Recommendations.” Brussels: Initiative for Peacebuilding.
Huysmans, Jef. 2002. “Shape-Shifting NATO: Humanitarian Action and the Kosovo Refugee Crisis.” Review of International Studies 28 (3): 599–618.
Council of the European Union. Press EU11-224EN. 2 July 2011. Accessed 6 August 2013.
Katzenstein, Peter J. 2010. “A World of Plural and Pluralist Civilizations: Multiple Actors, Traditions, and Practices.” In Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives, edired by Peter J. Katzenstein and G. John Ikenberry, 1–40. New York: Routledge.
Katzenstein, Peter J., and G. John Ikenberry. 2010. “Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives.” New York: Routledge.
Mitzen, J. 2006a. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–70.
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006b. “Anchoring Europe’s Civilizing Identity: Habits, Capabilities and Ontological Security.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 270–85.
Moore, Christopher W. 1986. The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Neumann, Iver B. 2002. “Returning Practice to Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy”. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 31 (3): 627–51.
Pouliot, Vincent. 2008. “The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities.” International Organization 62 (2): 257–288.
Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Towards a Theory of Social Practices: A Devlopment in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–63.
Sandole, Dennis J., Sean Byrne, Ubfrud Sandole-Staroste, and Jessica Senehi, eds. 2009. Hanadbook of Conflict Analyses. New York: Routledge.
Schatzki, Teodor. R. 2002. The Site of the Social. A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Schatzki, Teodor. R. 2005. “Peripheral Vision: The Sites of Organizations.” Organization Studies 26 (3): 465–484.
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Imporve the Human Conditions Have Failed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Steele, Brent. J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and IR State. London: Routledge.
Council of the European Union. 10 November 2009. “Concept on Strengthening Eu Mediation and Dialogue Capacity.” Accessed 4 July 2013. http://eeas.europa.eu/cfsp/ conflict_prevention/docs/concept_strengthening_eu_med_en.pdf
Varela, Miguel. June 2011. “Roundtable Report: International Peace Mediation Standards? Reviewing the Field, Charting the Way Ahead.” Published by European Forum for International Mediation and Dialogue, Brussels.
Young, Oran R. 1967. The Intermediaries: Third Parties in International Crises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wendt, Alexander. 2004. “The State as Person in International Theory.” Review of International Study 30 (2): 289–316.
Zartman, William I., and Saadia Touval. 1996. “International Mediation in the Post Cold War Era.” In Man-Aging Global Crises. edited by Chaster Crocker, Fen Hampson and Pamela Aall, 445–461. Washington: D.C.: USIP Press.
Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided and it is indicated if changes were made. / The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original.
Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in Journal of Regional Security and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to deposit author’s pre-print / author’s post-print (accepted version) / publisher's version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author's personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), and/or departmental website prior or during the submission process / at any time after the acceptance of the manuscript / at any time after publication.
Full bibliographic information (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages) about the original publication must be provided and links must be made to the article's DOI and the license.