Diferencijalna dijagnoza limfadenopatija
Sažetak
Kod većine pacijenata sa perifernom limfadenopatijom je lako identifikovati njen uzrok, koji je obično benigne prirode ili lokalizovan. Prevalencija maligniteta kod pacijenata sa limfadenopatijom u primarnoj zdravstvenoj zaštiti je procenjena na oko 1,1%. Identifikacija limfadenopatije uzrokovane malignitetom ili drugim teškim stanjima predstavlja kritičan izazov za lekare u primarnoj zdravstvenoj zaštiti. Glavni faktori rizika za malignitet su starost, čvrsti i fiksirani nodusi, supraklavikularna lokalizacija i trajanje limfadenopatije više od 2 nedelje. Posedovanje znanja o ovim ključnim faktorima rizika je kritično u tretiranju neobjašnjive limfadenopatije. Uz to, uzimanje kompletne anamneze, procena povezanih simptoma i detaljan fizički pregled mogu da pomognu u utvrđivanju da li je limfadenopatija benigna ili maligna. Neobjašnjiva limfadenopatija bez znakova ili simptoma teškog oboljenja ili maligniteta može biti praćena do mesec dana, nakon čega se indikuje specifično testiranje ili biopsija. Iako su moderne hematopatološke tehnike unapredile dijagnostičku preciznost aspiracije (biopsije) tankom iglom, eksciziona biopsija i dalje ostaje dijagnostička procedura prvog izbora.
Reference
Ferrer R. Lymphadenopathy: differential diagnosis and evaluation. Am Fam Physician 1998; 58: 1313-20.
Mohseni S, Shojaiefard A, Khorgami Z, Alinejad S, Ghorbani A, Ghafouri A. Peripheral Lymphadenopathy: Approach and Diagnostic Tools. Iran J Med Sci Supplement 2014; 39(2): 158-70.
Shrestha AK, Chalise PR, Shrestha ML. Lymph node biopsies: a hospital based retrospective study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2009; 48: 306-9.
Mohan A, Reddy MK, Phaneendra BV, Chandra A. Aetiology of peripheral lymphadenopathy in adults: analysis of 1724 cases seen at a tertiary care teaching hospital in southern India. Natl Med J India 2007; 20: 78-80.
Mohapatra PR, Janmeja AK. Tuberculous lymphadenitis. J Assoc Physicians India 2009; 57: 585-90.
Viiala N, Gibson J [Internet] An approach to the assessment of lymphadenopathy: [cited 2007 Jan 10]: http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/an-approach-to-the-assessment-of-lymphadenopathy.
Leung AK, Davies HD. Cervical lymphadenitis: etiology, diagnosis and management. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2009; 11:183-9.
Naz E, Mirza T, Aziz S, Danish F, Siddiqui ST, Ali A. Frequency and clinicopathologic correlation of different types of non Hodgkin’s lymphoma according to WHO classification. J Pak Med Assoc 2011; 61: 260-3.
Abba A, Khalil M. Clinical approach to Lymphadenopathy. Ann Nigerian Med 2012; 6(1): 11-7.
Bazemore A, Smucker D. Lymphadenopathy and Malignancy. Am Fam Physician 2002; 66(11): 2103-10.
Hurt C, Tammaro D. Diagnostic Evaluation of Mononucleosis-Like Illnesses. Am J Med 2007; 120: 911.
Khanna R, Sharma AD, Khanna S, Kumar M, Shukla RC. Usefulness of ultrasonography for the evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy. World J Surg Oncol 2011; 9: 29.
Ying M, Ahuja A, Brook F. Accuracy of sonographic vascular features in differentiating different causes of cervical lymphadenopathy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 441-7.
Nasuti JF, Yu G, Boudousquie A, Gupta P. Diagnostic value of lymph node fine needle aspiration cytology: an institutional experience of 387 cases observed over a 5-year period. Cytopathology 2000; 11: 18-31.
de Larrinoa AF, del Cura J, Zabala R, Fuertes E, Bilbao F, Lopez JI. Value of ultrasoundguided core biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant lymphoma. J Clin Ultrasound 2007; 35: 295-301.
Soldes OS, Yunger JG, Hirschl RB. Predictors of malignancy in childhood peripheral lymphadenopathy. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 1447-52.
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Lymphoma [Internet]. Australian Government National Healt and Medical Research Council c2005
Engert A, Eichenauer DA, Dreyling M, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Hodgkin’s lymphoma: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010; 21: v168-71.
Tilly H, Dreyling M, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2009; 20: 110-2.