EDUCATIONAL ROBOTS IN THE FUNCTION OF DEVELOPING ALGORITHMIC THINKING OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN
Abstract
In the modern world, children are growing up surrounded by digital technologies which are used spontaneously and intuitively. It is necessary to choose an appropriate methodological approach that supports interdisciplinary and cooperative work directed towards problem-solving and the development of children's creativity in order to create conducive conditions for the well-being of children in an educational environment supported by technology. This paper aims to construct a methodical model for the effective implementation of educational robots to develop algorithmic thinking in preschool children. The research is based on theoretical foundations, with arguments drawn from practice. Analytical-deductive and hypothetical-deductive methods were applied, as well as the method of modeling, through which was developed an innovative methodical approach (five-step model), based on research conducted for an unpublished master's thesis (Matović, 2022). The results indicate that the five-step model can contribute to the effective implementation of educational robots in educational work, encourage algorithmic thinking, interdisciplinary skills, and the development of competencies significant for lifelong learning (communication, self-reflection, planning).
References
Angeli, C., Valanides, N. (2020). Developing young children's computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in human behavior, 105, 105954.
Antonijević, M., Bradić-Martinović, A., Banović, J., & Ivanović, Đ. (2023). Is There a Relationship Between Country Development and Citizens’ Level of Digital Skills? Economic Analysis: journal of emerging economies.
Baird, J. R., Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1991). The importance of reflection in improving science teaching and learning. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 28(2), 163-182.
Brlek, V. (2020). Educational Robots And Their Application In Education. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Zagreb. Faculty of Teacher Education. Chair of Information Sciences). [In Croatian]
Bujjišić, Lj., (2023), The impact of informatics-developing teaching of Nature and Society on student achievements, doctoral thesis defended on July 10, 2023, Univerzitet u Beogradu: Učiteljski fakultet [In Serbian]
Chalmers, C., Chandra, V., Hudson, S. M., & Hudson, P. B. (2012). Preservice teachers teaching technology with robotics. In Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA) 2012 Conference.
Chen, C., Zheng, Y., & Shi, S. (2021). The influence of different inquiry-based teaching methods on children’s programming learning. Studies in Early Childhood Education, 3, 52–63.
Chevalier, M., Riedo, F., & Mondada, F. (2016). Pedagogical uses of thymio II: How do teachers perceive educational robots in formal education? IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23(2), 16-23.
Critten, V., Hagon, H., & Messer, D. (2022). Can pre-school children learn programming and coding through guided play activities? A case study in computational thinking. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(6), 969-981.
Europejska, K. (2006). The Key Competences for Lifelong Learning–A European Framework. Official Journal of the European Union, 30.
Jin, Q., Wang, D., Deng, X., Zheng, N., & Chiu, S. (2018). AR-maze: A tangible programming tool for children based on AR technology. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC‘18) (pp. 611–616). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3210784
Keane, T., Chalmers, C., Williams, M., & Boden, M. (2016). The impact of humanoid robots on students' computational thinking. In Australian Council for Computers in Education 2016 Conference: Refereed Proceedings (pp. 93-102). The Queensland Society for Information Technology in Education (QSITE).
Khanlari, A. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits and the challenges of integrating educational robots into primary/elementary curricula. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(3), 320-330.
Lindh, J., & Holgersson, T. (2007). Does lego training stimulate pupils’ ability to solve logicalproblems? Computers and Education, 49(4), 1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.00
Liu, Y., & Rojas, J. (2019). Evaluation of the ROOT robot system and curriculum to improve computational thinking in Chinese children. In IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (pp. 126–131), Depok, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/R10-HTC47129.2019.9042435 10, 40–41
Mandić, D., Miščević, G. & Bujišić, Lj. (2024). Evaluating the quality of responses generated by ChatGPT. Metodička teorija i praksa, 27(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.5937/metpra27-51446
Mariappan, M., Sing, J. C., & Nadarajan, M. (2015). A Design Methodology of ProgrammableTangible Blocks for Early Childhood Educational Robotic System. Journal of AppliedSciences Research, 11, 17-25.
Matović, S. (2022). A Methodological Approach to Developing Algorithmic Thinking in the Context of Exploring the Environment, (Master's thesis), Beograd: Učiteljski fakultet. [In Serbian]
Matović, S. (2024). Model for integrating theory and practice in the context of initial preschool teacher education. In B. Dumnić (Ed.), XXX Development Trends – Teachers and Associates as the Center of Change in Higher Education. Vrnjačka Banja, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Fakultet tehničkih nauka. ISBN: 978-86-6022-635-0 [In Serbian]
Mezak, J. (2022). Specifying the content of teaching course for educators - integration of algorithmic thinking skills. Educational Issues. 5(1), 199-224. [In Croatian]
Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., & Dong, J. J. (2013). A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning, 1(209-0015), 13.
Fundamentals of Preschool Education and Care Programs (2018). Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia – Educational Gazette, 16. [In Serbian]
Pavlović Breneselović, D., Krnjaja, Ž. (2017). Kaleidoscope: Fundamentals of Diversified Preschool Education Programs. Belgrade: Institute for Pedagogy and Andragogy. [In Serbian]
Pei, Z., & Nie, Y. (2018, December). Educational robots: Classification, characteristics, application areas and problems. In 2018 Seventh International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT) (pp. 57-62). IEEE.
Qi, X., Wang, W., Liao, Z., Zhang, X., Xue, L., Zhang, X., Li, J., Fang, T., & Wei, R. (2020). Robot teaching assistant and physical programming class for programming education of young children. In 1st International Conference on Control, Robotics and Intelligent System (CCRIS) (pp. 55–62). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3437802.3437812
Rečicki, Ž. & Girtner., Ž. (2002). Child and Computer. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. [In Serbian]
Ristić M., Blagdanić S, (2017). New Perspectives in Education - Outdoor Learning in a Digital Environment. Innovations in Teaching. XXX. 2017/2. Beograd: Učiteljski fakultet. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1702001R [In Serbian]
Stoković, G., Matović, S. & Ristić, M. (2023). Training preschool and school teachers for implementingeducational robots. In: V. Katić (ed.), Development Trends: University before New Challenges (218-221). Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Fakultet tehničkih nauka. ISBN: 978-86-6022-554-4 [In Serbian]
Strategy for the Development of Digital Skills in the Republic of Serbia for the Period 2020-2024. (2020). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 21 [In Serbian]
Strategy for the Development of Education and Upbringing in the Republic of Serbia until 2030 (2021). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 63 [In Serbian]
Tang, A. L., Tung, V. W. S., & Cheng, T. O. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of the potential use of educational robotics in management education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-12.
Uğur-Erdoğmuş, F. (2021). How Do Elementary Childhood Education Teachers Perceive RoboticEducation in Kindergarten? A Qualitative Study, In Participatory Educational Research. (PER). Vol. 8(2), pp. 421-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.21.47.8.2
UNICEF, (2019). Every child learns: UNICEF education strategy 2019-2030. NY: UNICEF, 23-36.
Vygotski, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, D., Wang, T., & Liu, Z. (2014). A tangible programming tool for children to cultivate computational thinking. The Scientific World Journal, article 428080, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/428080
Wang, D., Zhang, C., & Wang, H. (2011). T-Maze: A tangible programming tool for children. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ‘11) (pp. 127–135). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1999030.1999045
Wang, G., & Wang, H. (2020). Study of the impact of computational thinking education based on robots on behaviors of preschoolers. In The 4th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (ICEMT) (pp. 235–238). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3416797.3416823
Wang, X. C., Choi, Y., Benson, K., Eggleston, C., & Weber, D. (2021). Teacher’s role in fostering preschoolers’ computational thinking: An exploratory case study. Early Education and Development, 32(1), 26-48.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33– 35.
Xing, Q., Wang, D., Zhao, Y., & Wang X. (2020). Clas-Maze: An edutainment tool combining tangible programming and living knowledge. In N. J. Nunes, L. Ma, M. Wang, N. Correia N., & Z. Pan. (Eds), Entertainment computing-ICEC: vol 12523 (pp. 353–368). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65736-9_32
Zlatarović, V., Kuzmanović N., Anđelković, N., Lakićević, O., Đorović, E., Veličković S. (2022). Framework of Digital Competences for Preschool Educators in Preschool Institutions. Beograd: Ministarstvo prosvete, nauke i tehnološkog razvoja, Zavod za vrednovanje kvaliteta obrazovanja i vaspitanja, Zavod za unapređivanje obrazovanja i vaspitanja.
