MODELI ORGANIZACIJE „ONE-STOP“ KLINIKA ZA BOLESTI ŠTITASTE ŽLEZDE: PREGLED PROCESA, INDIKATORA PERFORMANSI I ISHODA IZ LITERATURE
Sažetak
Pozadina: Fragmentisani putevi zbrinjavanja nodularne bolesti štitaste žlezde produžavaju vreme do odluke i povećavaju troškove. „One-stop“ klinike (OSK) integrišu klinički pregled, ultrazvuk, UZ-vođenu FNA i, po potrebi, ROSE/telecitologiju u jednoj poseti.
Cilj: Mapirati organizacione modele OSK, definisati ključne pokazatelje performansi (KPI) i sumirati ishode (vreme, posete, adekvatnost, ponovljene FNA, troškovi, zadovoljstvo, bezbednost).
Metode: Scoping pregled prema PRISMA-ScR i JBI. Pretražene su MEDLINE, Scopus i Web of Science (2000–avgust 2025). Uključene su studije koje operacionalizuju OSK i/ili izveštavaju KPI/ishode. Ekstrakcija je obuhvatila organizacione karakteristike, protokole (ACR/EU-TIRADS, Bethesda), metrike toka, adekvatnost FNA/ROSE, ekonomiku, zadovoljstvo i bezbednost. Sprovedena je narativna sinteza.
Rezultati: Identifikovani modeli OSK dosledno skraćuju lead-time do odluke i redukuju broj poseta. Adekvatnost uzoraka je visoka, posebno uz ROSE/telecitologiju, što smanjuje ponovne punkcije. Zadovoljstvo pacijenata je visoko; bezbednosni profil FNA ostaje povoljan. Ekonomske analize ukazuju da je isplativost ROSE kontekst-zavisna i najveća pri višoj baznoj neadekvatnosti i/ili nižem trošku. Predložen je KPI paket: lead-time, udeo „jedna poseta“, Bethesda I, udeo ROSE, ponovna FNA ≤90 dana, trošak po epizodi, zadovoljstvo.
Zaključak: OSK su primenljiv i vrednosno orijentisan model za dijagnostiku štitaste žlezde. Selektivna primena ROSE/telecitologije i upravljanje na osnovu KPI omogućavaju efikasnu i bezbednu implementaciju u različitim resursnim okruženjima.
Reference
2. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5):587–595. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.046
3. Russ G, Bonnema SJ, Erdogan MF, Durante C, Ngu R, Leenhardt L. EU-TIRADS. Eur Thyroid J. 2017;6(5):225–237. doi:10.1159/000478927
4. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid. 2017;27(11):1341–1346. doi:10.1089/thy.2017.0500
5. Durante C, Grani G, Lamartina L, Filetti S, Mandel SJ, Cooper DS. The Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules: A Review. JAMA. 2018;319(9):914–924. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0898
6. Patel R, Skandarajah A, Gorelik A, et al. One-stop thyroid nodule clinic with same-day fine-needle aspiration cytology improves efficiency of care. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(4):354–358. doi:10.1111/ans.13833
7. Carral F, Ayala MC, Jiménez AI, García C. Care and economic impact of thyroid ultrasound examination at single visits to endocrinology clinics (ETIEN 1). Endocrinol Nutr. 2016;63(2):64–69. doi:10.1016/j.endonu.2015.10.008
8. Díaz-Soto G, Torres B, López Gómez JJ, et al. Economic impact of and satisfaction with a high-resolution thyroid nodule clinic. Endocrinol Nutr. 2016;63(8):414–420. doi:10.1016/j.endonu.2016.04.005
9. Witt BL, Schmidt RL. Rapid onsite evaluation improves the adequacy of fine-needle aspiration for thyroid lesions: meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2013;23(4):428–435. doi:10.1089/thy.2012.0211
10. Krishna A, Mishra SK, Mishra A, et al. One-stop thyroid clinic in a low- and middle-income country. S Afr J Surg. 2022;60(3):189–194. doi:10.17159/2078-5151/SAJS3633
11. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA-ScR. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850
12. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. JBI guidance for scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–2126. doi:10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
14. Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, et al. PRISMA-S. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):39. doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
15. Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919
16. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015. BMJ. 2015;351:h5527. doi:10.1136/bmj.h5527
17. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. STROBE. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296
18. Post R, Chai SM, Wang L, et al. Telecytology ROSE with real-time streaming: comparative study. Diagn Cytopathol. 2023;51(11):E383–E391. doi:10.1002/dc.25228
19. Lodewijk L, Vriens MR, Vorselaars WMC, et al. Same-Day FNAC reduces anxiety and maintains accuracy. Endocr Pract. 2016;22(5):561–566. doi:10.4158/EP151036.OR
20. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2477–2481. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1011024
21. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The Triple Aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(3):759–769. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759
22. Pastorello RG, de Almeida DC, de Morais RM, et al. Impact of ROSE on thyroid FNAB: meta-analysis. Cancer Cytopathol. 2018;126(12):995–1006. doi:10.1002/cncy.22051
23. Zanocco K, Pitelka-Zengou L, Dalal S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of on-site adequacy for initial US-guided FNA. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2462–2467. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-2954-1
24. O’Malley ME, Weir MM, Hahn PF, et al. US-guided FNA: adequacy & time with/without immediate cytology. Radiology. 2002;222(2):383–387. doi:10.1148/radiol.2222010201
25. Sifontes-Dubón M, García-López JM, González-Ortega N, Pazos-Couselo M. Clinical pathway timings & delays in thyroid cancer. J Clin Med. 2021;10(23):5681. doi:10.3390/jcm10235681
26. Michael CW, Kameyama K, Kitagawa W, Azar N. ROSE: benefits, challenges, solutions. Gland Surg. 2020;9(5):1708–1715. doi:10.21037/gs-2019-catp-23
27. Jiang D, Zang Y, Jiang D, Zhang X, Zhao C. Value of ROSE for US-guided thyroid FNA. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(2):626–634. doi:10.1177/0300060518807060
28. Pearson LN, Layfield LJ, Eapen GA, Michael CW. Cost-effectiveness of ROSE by non-pathologists. Cancer Cytopathol. 2018;126(10):839–845. doi:10.1002/cncy.22047
29. Park JY, Choi W, Hong AR, et al. Harms of thyroid FNA: systematic review. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2023;38(1):104–116. doi:10.3803/EnM.2023.1669
30. Lee YH, Baek JH, Jung SL, et al. US-guided FNA: basics and practical points. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16(2):391–401. doi:10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.391
31. Ha EJ, Baek JH, Lee JH, et al. Complications after US-guided core-needle biopsy (n=6,169). Eur Radiol. 2017;27(3):1186–1194. doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4461-9
32. Lin DM, Tracht J, Rosenblum F, et al. Telecytology ROSE reduced unsatisfactory rates. Am J Clin Pathol. 2020;153(3):342–345. doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqz164
33. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. CFIR framework. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
34. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. RE-AIM framework. Am J Prev Med. 1999;16(1):50–57. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00158-0
35. Perla RJ, Provost LP, Murray SK. The run chart: learning from variation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(1):46–51. doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.044843
