The Influence of the Period of Retention on the Reliability of Episodic Memory in the Context of Testimony
Abstract
The paper presents a study that aimed to examine the reliability of episodic memory by varying the retention time from the moment of initial observation of two incidents to the moment of communicating what had actually been remembered. Ninety (90) students aged from 21-26 years, from the University of Criminalistic and Police Studies participated in the research (50 males and 40 females). The interval of retention presented an independent variable on four levels: T1 (immediately after watching a recording), T2 (after 1 month), T3 (after 3 months) and T4 (after 6 months). The accuracy of remembering one aspect of the incident is a dependent variable: characteristics of the event, characteristics of the perpetrators and characteristics of the victim. Results suggest that memory accuracy declines dramatically after a month (T2), but also after three and six months, when the downward trend in memory accuracy is less pronounced. Regarding the degree of confidence in memory accuracy, the pattern of results is practically identical to that of memory accuracy. As a whole, the results indicate that the retention interval strongly affects both accuracy and certainty in memory accuracy, regardless of the type of crime and the characteristics being evaluated.
References
Areh, I. (2004). Pričanja očividcev – dejavniki, ki vplivajo na verodostojnost priče. Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo, 55(3), 275–284.
Author & Deljkić, I. (2019). Kriminalistička psihologija. Sarajevo: Fakultet za kriminalistiku, kriminologiju i sigurnosne studije.
Blackwell-Young, J. (2008). Witness evidence. In G. Davies, C. Hollin, & R. Bull (Eds.).
Bornstein, B. H., Deffenbacher, K. A., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2012). Effects of exposure time and cognitive operations on facial identification accuracy: A meta-analysis of two variables associated with initial memory strength. Psychology, Crime and Law, 18, 473–490.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition. Routledge.
Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 687–706.
Evans, J. R., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). Eyewitness memory: Balancing the accuracy, precision and quantity of information through metacognitive monitoring and control. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 501–508.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
Garrett, B. (2011). Convicting the Innocent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson.
Howitt, D. (2009). Forensic and Criminal Psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Ibabe, I., & Sporer, S. L. (2004). How you ask is what you get: on the influence of question form on accuracy and confidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 711–726.
IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Innocence project (2018). Innocence Project. Retreved March 17, 2020, from https://www. innocenceproject.org/
Ivanović, Z. & Author (2019). Taktika obezbeđivanja iskaza. Beograd: Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet.
Koren, D., Seidman, L. J., Goldsmith, M., & Harvey, P. D. (2006). Real-world cognitive - And metacognitive - Dysfunction in schizophrenia: A new approach for measuring (and remediating) more “right stuff”. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, 310–326.
Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537.
Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., Schneider, W., & Nakash-Dura, M. (2001). The credibility of children's testimony: Can children control the accuracy of their memory reports? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 405–437.
Larsson, A. S., Granhag, P. A., & Spjut, E. (2003). Children's recall and the cognitive interview: Do the positive effects hold over time? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 203–214.
Lindholm, T., Jönsson, F. U., & Liuzza, M. T. (2018). Retrieval effort cues predict eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 24(4), 534–542. Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading Questions and the Eyewitness Report. Cognitive psychology, 7, 560-572. Loftus, E. F. (2003). Make-believe memories. American Psychologist, 58, 864–873. Morgan, C. A., Southwick, S., Steffian, G., Hazlett, G. A., & Loftus, E. F. (2013). Misinformation can influence memory for recently experienced, highly stressful events. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36(1),11-7. Odinot, G., & Wolters, G. (2006). Repeated recall, retention interval and the accuracy–confidence relation in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 973–985. Pansky, A. (2012). Inoculation against forgetting: Advantages of immediate versus delayed initial testing due to superior verbatim accessibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1792–1800.
Pansky, A., Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Pearlman-Avnion, S. (2009). Memory accuracy in old age: Cognitive, metacognitive, and neurocognitive determinants. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 303–329.
Pansky, A., & Nemets, E. (2012). Enhancing the quantity and accuracy of eyewitness memory via initial memory testing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 2–11.
Pansky, A., Tenenboim, E., & Bar, S. K. (2011). The misinformation effect revisited: Interactions between spontaneous memory processes and misleading suggestions. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 270–287.
Pickel, K. L., Ross, S. J., & Truelove, R. S. (2006). Do weapons automatically capture attention? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 871–893.
Pozzulo, J. D., & Warren, K. L. (2003). Descriptions and identification of strangers by youth and adult eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 315–323.
Roediger, III, & DeSoto, K. A. (2014). “Understanding the relation between confidence and accuracy in reports from memory,” in Psychology Press Festschrift Series. Remembering: Attributions, processes, and control in Human Memory: Essays in Honor of Larry Jacoby, eds D. S. Lindsay, C. M. Kelley, A. P. Yonelinas, and H. L. Roediger II (New York, NY: Psychology Press), 347–367.
Roebers, C. M., & Schneider, W. (2005). The strategic regulation of children's memory performance and suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 24–44.
Sarwar, F., Allwood, C. M., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2014). Effects of different types of forensic information on eyewitness’ memory and confidence accuracy. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 6(1), 17–27. Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence: Five days to execution, and other dispatches from the wrongly covicted. NY: Doubleday.
Shapira, A. A., & Pansky, A. (2019). Cognitive and metacognitive determinants of eyewitness memory accuracy over time. Metacognition and Learning, 14(3), 437–461.
Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., & Blank, H. (2017). A cognitive approach to lie detection: a meta-analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22, 1–21.
Wells, G. L., Memon, A., & Penrod, S. D. (2006). Eyewitness evidence: improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 45–75.
Wise, R. A., & Safer, M. A. (2004). What US judges know and believe about eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 427–443.
Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2018). Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(3), 324–335.
Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: a new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18,10–65.
