How to improve reading comprehension
an overview of types of pedagogical interventions
Abstract
Literacy, according to contemporary understanding, is a situational, complex competence integrated into various social practices. Therefore, we view it as multiple literacies with numerous dimensions—linguistic, mathematical, scientific, political, economic, media-related, and so on. However, multiple literacies can only be achieved through the development of linguistic literacy, which serves as the mediator and moderator of all other literacies. The most researched aspect of linguistic literacy is reading comprehension. The aim of this paper is to categorize and systematize various pedagogical interventions that contribute to the development of reading comprehension, which is the foundation of all meaningful learning. The analysis and organization of empirical findings, programs, and practical endeavors were based on two criteria: who is the primary actor or most responsible for a particular type of intervention, and what is the focus of the intervention to be implemented. Our analysis identified six different types: psychological-pedagogical-linguistic interventions on the text itself; support for the development of students' cognitive competencies related to reading; support for the development of students' personality and affective competencies; innovations in teaching/learning methods; interventions in the learning environment; and interventions in the domain of educational policies. The paper provides descriptions and examples for each type of pedagogical intervention and concludes that the synergy of all is the most effective way to develop literacy in children and youth.
References
Antić, S. (2015). The potentials od textbooks to scaffold construction of student’s knowledge. In M.H. Martinho and M.do Céu de Melo (Eds.), LiDEs – A literacia das disciplinas escolares: desafios nas aulas de História e Matemática. (pp 9-33). Universidade do Minho. Instituto de Educação. Centro de Investigação em Educação (CIEd).
Antić, S. (2022). Language in the classroom: how to support the development of functional literacy. In J. Stevanović, D. Gundogan & B. Ranđelović (Eds.), The State, Problems, and Needs of the Modern Education Community (str. 29-35). Institut za pedagoška istraživanja.
Antić, S. (2024). Makrostruktura teksta u nastavi: podrška ili prepreka smislenom učenju? Psihološka istraživanja 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5937/PSISTRA0-45268
Antić, S. i Stevanović, J. (2023). Problemi pismenosti: danas i ovde. U A. Kostić i A. Pešikan (Ur.), Obrazovanje: stanje, perspektive i uloga u razvoju Srbije (str. 177-194). Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.
Antić, S. Pešikan, A. Pešić, J. (2008). Kako se kreira tumačenje istorije: primenа gramatike priče u analizi udžbenika istorije. XIV naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji (34-35), 7-8. februar 2008. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet. http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Knjiga-Rezimea-EIP-2008.pdf
Bakhtin, M. M. (2008). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin:University of Texas Press.
Beck, L., Kumschick, I. R., Eid, M., & Klann-Delius, G. (2012). Relationships between language competence and emotional competence in middle childhood. Emotion, 12(3), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026320
Block, C. C., Parris, S. R., Reed, K. L., Whiteley, C. S., & Cleveland, M. D. (2009). Instructional approaches that significantly increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014319
Bruner, Dž. (2000). Kultura obrazovanja. Zagreb: Educa.
Bussiere, P., Hebert, R., Knighton, T. (2009). Educational outcomes at age 21 associated with reading ability at age 15. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada, Catalogue No. 81-004-X Vol. 6 No. 2. Preuzeto septembra 2022. sa: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-004-x/2009002/article/10896-eng.htm
Compton, D. L.,Miller, A. C., Gilbert, J. K.&Steacy, L. M. (2013).What can be learned about the reading comprehension of poor readers through the use of advanced statistical modeling techniques? In B. Miller, L. E. Cutting & P. McCardle (Eds.), Unraveling the behavioral, neurobiological, & genetic components of reading comprehension (pp. 135–147). Brookes.
Cunningham, A.E. & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). What reading does for the mind. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1(2), 137–149.
Danielson, K. (2010). Learning Chemistry: Text Use and Text Talk in a Finland - Swedish Chemistry Classroom. IARTEM e-Journal, 3(2), 1 – 28.
DeWalt, D. & Pignone, M. (2005). Reading Is Fundamental: The Relationship Between Literacy and Health. Archives of internal medicine, 165(17), 1943–1944. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.17.1943
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving From the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002239
Dore, R. A., Amendum, S. J., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2018). Theory of mind: A hidden factor in reading comprehension? Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 1067–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9443-9
Duke, N. and Cartwright, K. (2019). The drive model of reading: deploying reading in varied environments. In D. Alvermann, N.Unrau, M. Sailors, and R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical Models And Processes Of Literacy (pp. 118-136). Routledge.
Duke, N. K., & Roberts, K. L. (2010). The genre-specific nature of reading comprehension. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews & J. Hoffman (Eds). The Routledge International Handbook of English, language and literacy teaching (pp. 74-83). Routledge.
Dutke, S., Grefe, A.C. & Leopold, C. (2016). Learning from scientific texts: personalizing the text increases transfer performance and task involvement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(4), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0281-6
Gee J. (2000). Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research:Vol 3. (pp. 195-209). LEA
Gee, J. P. (1999). Critical Issues: Reading and the new literacy studies: reframing the national academy of sciences report on reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 31(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969909548052
Golke, S., Hagen, R., & Wittwer, J. (2019). Lost in narrative? The effect of informative narratives on text comprehension and metacomprehension accuracy. Learning and Instruction, 60, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.003
Graesser, A. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. McNammara (Ed.), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies (pp. 3-27). LEA
Greene Brabham, E., & Lynch-Brown, C. (2002). Effects of teachers' reading-aloud styles on vocabulary acquisition and comprehension of students in the early elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.465
Hunn, L., Teague, B. & Fisher, P. (2023). Literacy and mental health across the globe: a systematic review. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 27(4), 392-406. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHSI-09-2022-0064
Ivić, I. Pešikan, A. i Antić, S. (2003). Aktivno učenje 2. Institut za psihologiju.
Ivić, I., Pešikan, A. i Kostić, A. (2021). Ključni podaci o obrazovanju u Srbiji. SANU.
Ivić, I., Pešikan, A. & Antić, S. (2013). Textbook quality: A Guide to textbook standards. V&R unipress
Johnsen, E. B. (1993). Textbooks in the kaleidoscope. A critical survey of literature and research on educational texts (pp. 165-166). Scandinavian University Press.
Joshi, R. M. (2005). Vocabulary: A Critical Component of Comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 21(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560590949278
Katzir, T. (2022). The Feeling of reading in a changing world: from neurons to narratives. In M. Suárez-Orozco & C. Suárez-Orozco (Ed.), Education: A Global Compact for a Time of Crisis (pp. 301-312). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/suar20434-020
Katzir, T., & Lipka. O. (2017). An island of understanding - Teacher's manual. University of Haifa. https://ejsafra.haifa.ac.il/global-education-paper-10-2-2020/
Katzir, T., Kim, Y.S., & Dotan, S. (2018). Reading self-concept and reading anxiety in second grade children: The roles of word reading, emergent literacy skills, working memory and gender. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1180.
Katzir, T., Lesaux, N. K., & Kim, Y. S. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 261-276.
Li, J.-T., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., & Rivera, H. (2024). The effects of four instructional strategies on English learners’ English reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821994133
Lincoln, A. K., Adams, W., Eyllon, M., Garverich, S., Prener, C. G., Griffith, J., Paasche-Orlow, M. K., & Hopper, K. (2017). The Double Stigma of Limited Literacy and Mental Illness: Examining Barriers to Recovery and Participation among Public Mental Health Service Users. Society and Mental Health, 7(3), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869317707001
Liyan, Y., Jie Yu, J., and Tong X. (2023). Social–emotional skills correlate with reading ability among typically developing readers: a meta-analysis. Education Sciences, 13(2) 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020220
Maughan, B., & Carroll, J. (2006). Literacy and mental disorders. Current opinion in psychiatry, 19(4), 350–354. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.yco.0000228752.79990.41
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and instruction. Second edition. Pearson.
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
McNamara, D., Ozuru, Y.,Best, R. & O’Reilly, T. (2007). The 4-Pronged Comprehension Strategy Framework. In D. McNammara (Ed.), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies (pp. 465- 497). Mahwah, New Jersey : LEA
Meer, Y., Breznitz, Z., & Katzir, T. (2016). Calibration of Self-Reports of Anxiety and Physiological Measures of Anxiety While Reading in Adults With and Without Reading Disability. Dyslexia, 22(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1532
Meneghetti C., Carretti, B., De Beni, R. (2006). Components of reading comprehension and scholastic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 291–301.
Mullis, I. V. S., von Davier, M., Foy, P., Fishbein, B., Reynolds, K. A., & Wry, E. (2023). PIRLS 2021 International Results in Reading. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.tr2103.kb5342
Muždeka, V. (2005). Periodni sistem elemenata. U S.Autor, R., Jankov i A. Pešikan. (Ur). Kako približiti deci prirodne nauke kroz aktivno učenje: zbirka scenarija (str.36-37). Institut za psihologiju Filozofski fakultet.
Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). LEA.
National Reading Panel (U.S.) & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. ttps://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
OECD (2019), PISA 2018 Results (Vol. I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Otero, J. (2002). Noticing and Fixing Difficulties While Undrestanding Science text. In J. Otero, J. León, & A. Graesser (Eds), The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension (pp.281-309). Erlbaum.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3233567
Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2001). The interplay of first-hand and second-hand investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-five Years of Progress (pp. 151-193). LEA.
Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-561). LEA.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. LEA.
Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N. K., & Martineau, J. A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre-specific text: roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 8–45. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4151702
Reynolds, D., & Fisher, W. (2022). What happens when adolescents meet complex texts? Describing moments of scaffolding textual encounters. Literacy, 56(4), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12258
Sabag-Shushan, T. & Katzir, T. (2023). Emotional understanding in reading comprehension at the text, task, and reader levels: a comparison of diverse struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10447-x
Segal, A., Dotan, S. & Katzir, T., (2023). Development over time of the reading self-concept in fourth- and fifth-grade students. Current Psychology, 42(32), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03871-9
Sentell, T. L. & Shumway, M. A. (2003). Low literacy and mental illness in a nationally representative sample. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191(8), 549-552. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000082185.26868.dc
Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (2001). One million children: Success for All. Corwin Press.
Smagorinsky, P., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning to be literate. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 605–626). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.036
Smagorinsky, P., & Smith, M. W. (1992). The nature of knowledge in composition and literary understanding: The question of specificity. Review of Educational Research, 62, 279–305.
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. RAND
Thomas, H. (2010). Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis‘placement’ of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 41 (3), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00974.x
Videnović, M., Čaprić, G. (2020). PISA izveštaj za Republiku Srbiju, 2018. Ministarstvo prosvete, nauke i tehnološkog razvoja.
Vigotski, L. (1983). Jezik i mišljenje. Nolit.
Vitale, M. & Romance, N. (2007). A knowledge-based framework for unifying content-area reading comprehension and reading comprehension strategies. In D. McNammara (Ed.), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies. (pp. 73-104). LEA.
Yussof, Y. M., Jamian, A. R., Hamzah, Z. A. Z., & Roslan, S. (2013). Students' Reading Comprehension Performance with Emotional Literacy-Based Strategy Intervention. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 1(1), 82-88.
Zaccoletti, S., Raccanello, D., Burro, R., & Mason, L. (2023). Reading with induced worry: The role of physiological self‐regulation and working memory updating in text comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12491
