Field efficacy of different fungicide mixtures in control of net blotch on barley

  • Miloš Stepanović Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
  • Emil Rekanović Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
  • Svetlana Milijašević-Marčić Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
  • Ivana Potočnik Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
  • Biljana Todorović Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
  • Jelena Stepanović Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
Keywords: Fungicides, Chemical control, Net blotch, Barley,

Abstract


Seven fungicide mixtures (epoxiconazol + metconazole, boscalid + epoxiconazole,
pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole, prothioconazole + tebuconazole, picoxistrobin +
cyproconazole, azoxystrobin + cyproconazole and spiroxamine + tebuconazole + triadimenol) were evaluated for control of net blotch of barley caused by Drechslera teres, as well as yield losses, over the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons. Two applications of the fungicide combination pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole at the rate of 1.0 l ha-1 were the most effective treatment in controlling the disease and improving yield in both experimental years. Treatments with the fungicide mixtures epoxiconazol + metconazole and spiroxamine + tebuconazole + triadimenol showed the least effectiveness in disease control, as well as yield increase.

Author Biographies

Miloš Stepanović, Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
Laboratory of Applied Phytopathology, Scientific Associate
Emil Rekanović, Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
Laboratory of Applied Phytopathology
Svetlana Milijašević-Marčić, Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
Laboratory of Applied Phytopathology
Ivana Potočnik, Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
Laboratory of Applied Phytopathology
Biljana Todorović, Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
Laboratory of Applied Phytopathology
Jelena Stepanović, Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade – Zemun
Laboratory of Applied Phytopathology

References

Abbott, W.S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18(2), 265-267.

Carmona, M.A., Barreto, D.E., & Reis, E.M. (1999). Detection, transmission and control of Drechslera teres in barley seed. Seed Science & Technology, 27, 761-769.

Chin, K.M., Chavaillaz, D., Kaesbohrer, M., Staub, T., & Felsenstein, F.G. (2001). Characterizing resistance risk of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici to strobilurins. Crop Protection, 20, 87-96.

EPPO (2012a). Design and analysis of efficacy evaluation trials. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 42(3), 367-381.

EPPO (2012b). Foliar and ear diseases on cereals. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 42(3), 419-425.

Gisi, U., Chin, K.M., Knapova, G., Kung Farber, R., Mohr, U., Parisi, S, Steinfeld, U. (2000). Recent developments in elucidating modes of resistance to phenylamide, DMI and strobilurin fungicides. Crop Protection, 19, 863-872.

Jayasenaa, K.W., Loughmanb, R., & Majewskib, J. (2002). Evaluation of fungicides in control of spot-type net blotch on barley. Crop Protection, 21, 63-69.

Jayasena, K.W., Van Burgel, A., Tanaka, K., Majewski, J., & Loughman, R. (2007). Yield reduction in barley in relation to spot-type net blotch. Australasian Plant Pathology, 36, 429-433.

Kangas, A., Kedonpera, A., Laine, A., Lindroos, M., Niskanen, M., Salo, Y. ... Ram-stadius, E. (2004). Disease susceptibility of cereal varieties in Finnish official variety trials 1997-2004. Agrifood Research Working Papers, 77, 31.

Khan, T.N. (1989). Effect of spot-type net blotch (Drechslera teres (Sacc.) Shoem) infection on barley yield in short season environment of northern cereal belt of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 40, 745-752.

Liu, Z.H., Zhong, S., Stasko, A.K., Edwards, M.C., & Friesen, T.L. (2012). Virulence profile and genetic structure of a North Dakota population of Pyrenophora teres f. teres, the causal agent of net form net blotch of barley. Phytopathology, 102, 539-546.

Mathre, D.E. (1997). Net blotch. In D.E. Mather (Ed.), Compendium of barley diseases (2nd ed., pp 28-31). St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society.

McLean, M.S. (2011). The epidemiology and control of spot form of net blotch of barley in Victoria, Australia. PhD thesis. School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Australia.

McLean, M.S., Howlett, B.J., & Hollaway, G.J. (2009). Epidemiology and control of spot form of net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f. maculata) of barley: a review. Crop & Pasture Science, 60, 303-315.

McLean, M.S., Howlett, B.J., & Hollaway, G.J. (2010). Spot form of net blotch, caused by Pyrenophora teres f. maculata, is the most prevalent foliar disease of barley in Victoria, Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology, 39, 46-49.

Pereyra, S.A., & Castro, M. (2011). Managing spot-type net blotch through cultivar resistance and fungicides in Uruguay. In Fourth International Workshop on Barley Leaf Blights, Dundee, Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.hutton.ac.uk/sites/default/files/files/events/IWBLB/Poster-Pereyra.pdf

Platz, G.J., & Usher, T.R. (2006). Losses to spot form net blotch in north-eastern Australia. In Turkington TK, Orr D., Xi K. (eds), Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Barley Leaf Blights (pp 63-66). Lacombe, Canada: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Sarpeleh, A., Tate, M.E., Wallwork, H., Catchside, D., & Able, A.J. (2008a). Characterisation of low molecular weight phytotoxins isolated from Pyrenophora teres. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 73, 154-162.

Sarpeleh, A., Wallwork, H., Catcheside, D.E.A., Tate, M.E., & Able, A.J. (2007). Proteinaceous metabolites from Pyrenophora teres contribute to symptom development of barley net blotch. Phytopathology, 97, 907-915.

Sarpeleh, A., Wallwork, H., Tate, M.E., Catchside, D.E.A., & Able, A.J. (2008b). Initial characterisation of phytotoxic proteins isolated from Pyrenophora teres. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 72, 73-79.

Scott, D.B. (1992). Assessment of resistance in barley to Pyrenophora teres and Pyrenophora japonica. Crop Protection, 11, 240-242.

Smedegard-Petersen, V. (1971). Pyrenophora teres f. maculata f. nov. and Pyrenophora teres f. teres on barley in Denmark. Year book of the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University (Copenhagen), 124-144.

Soovali, P., & Koppel, M. (2010). Efficacy of fungicide tebuconazole in barley varietes with different resistance level. Agricultural and Food Science, 19, 34-42.

Steffenson, B.J., Webster, R.K., & Jackson, L.F. (1991). Reduction in yield loss using incomplete resistance to Pyrenophora teres f. teres in barley. Plant Disease, 75, 96-100.

Sutton, J.C., & Steele, P. (1983). Effects of seed and foliar fungicides on progress of net blotch and yield in barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 63, 631-639.

Townsend, G.R., & Heuberger, J.V. (1943). Methods for estimating losses caused by diseases in fungicide experiments. Plant Disease Reporter, 27, 340-343.

van den Berg, C.G.J., & Rossnagel, B.G. (1990). Effect of tilt on severity of spottype net blotch, grain yield and yield components in barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 70, 473-480.

Weiergang, I., Lyngs Jorgensen, H.J., Moller, I.M., Friis, P., & Smedegaard-Petersen V. (2002). Correlation between sensitivity of barley to Pyrenophora teres toxins and susceptibility to the fungus. Physiological & Molecular Plant Pathology, 60, 121-129.

Published
2016/06/24
Section
Original Scientific Paper