Response of wild Mus musculus to baits containing essential oils: II Bromadiolone and difenacoum baits with 0.75% cinnamon oil tested in storages
Abstract
The effects of 0.75 % concentration of cinnamon essential oil on bait attractiveness and
total biological efficacy of bromadiolone and difenacoum rodenticides to the house mouse
were tested in practice.
The experiments were conducted in storages with stable house mouse populations for
which no resistance to anticoagulant rodenticides had been previously reported.
A statistically significant difference was detected between bromadiolone and difenacoum
baits. Consumption of bromadiolone baits supplemented with cinnamon essential oil was 74 % higher than the consumption of bromadiolone baits without cinnamon oil. The average efficacy of bromadiolone baits in controlling house mice was 96 %.
Cinnamon essential oil added to difenacoum baits increased bait consumption by 39 %, i.e. it was 119 % higher than the consumption of oil-free baits. The average efficacy of
difenacoum baits in controlling house mice was 99.5 %.
References
Advani, R. (1995). Mouse populations and their control in New York City. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 36(1-2), 135-141. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-8305(95)00068-2
Brooks, J.E., & Rowe, F.P. (1987). Commensal rodent control. (Vector control series: Rodents, training and information guide, VBC/87.949). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Buckle, A.P., & Smith, R.H. (Eds.) (1994). Rodent pests and their control. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
Bull, J.O. (1976). Laboratory and field investigations with difenacoum, a promising new rodenticide. In Proceedings of the 7th Vertebrate Pest Conference (pp 72-84). Davis, California: University of California. Available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/vpc7/
Đukić, N., Horvatović, A., Kataronovski, D., Maletin, S., Matavulj, M., Pujin, V., & Sekulić, R. (2005). Poljoprivredna zoologija sa ekologijom i fiziologija prirode - Opšta zoologija i sistematika životinja (Agricultural zoology with ecology and physiology of nature – Basic zoology and animal systematics). Novi Sad, Serbia: Faculty of Agriculture.
EPPO/OEPP (2004a). Guideline for the efficacy evaluation of rodenticides: Laboratory tests for evaluation of the toxicity and acceptability of rodenticides and rodenticides preparations. In: EPPO Standards - Guidelines for the efficacy evaluation of plant protection products. Volume 5 - Rodenticides (pp 23-35). Paris. France: EPPO/OEPP.
EPPO/OEPP (2004b). Guideline for the efficacy evaluation of rodenticides: Field tests against synanthropic rodents (Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus & R. rattus). In: EPPO Standards - Guidelines for the efficacy evaluation of plant protection products. Volume 5 - Rodenticides (pp 36-47). Paris. France: EPPO/OEPP.
Hadler, M.R, Redfern, R., & Rowe, F.P. (1975). Laboratory evaluation of difenacoum as a rodenticide. Journal of Hygene, 74(3), 441-448.
Hrgović N., Vukićević. Z., & Kataranovski, D. (1991). Deratizacija - Suzbijanje populacija štetnih glodara (Rodent control: Control of rodent pest populations). Belgrade. Serbia: Dečje novine.
Janjić, V. (2005). Fitofarmacija (Chemical control products). Belgrade, Serbia; Banjaluka, RS: Društvo za zaštitu bilja Srbije, Institut za istraživanja u poljoprivredi „Srbija”, Poljoprivredni fakultet, Banja Luka, 1-1229.
Jokić, G., Mitrić, S., Pejin, D., Blažić, T., Đedović, S., Stojnić, B., & Vukša, M. (2018). Response of wild Mus musculus to baits containing essential oils: I - Cinnamon and clove tested in storage facilities. Pesticides and Phytomedicine, 33(2), 137-144. doi:10.2298/pif1802137j
Jokić, G., Vukša, M., & Đedović, S. (2008). Efficacy and palatability of different rodenticide formulations applied against house mouse (Mus musculus L.) in plant storage facilities. Pesticides and Phytomedicine, 23(2), 115-121. doi:10.2298/pif0802115j
Jokić, G., Vukša, M., Đedović, S., Stojnić, B., Kataranovski, D., & Šćepović, T. (2013). Effects of different essential oils on the acceptability and palatability of cereal-based baits for laboratory mice. Pesticides and Phytomedicine, 28(2), 111-116. doi:10.2298/pif1302111j
Roberts, T.R., & Hutson, D.H. (Eds.) (1999). Metabolic pathways of agrochemicals. Part 2: Insecticides and fungicides (pp 897-936). Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Rowe, F.P., & Bradfield, A. (1976). Trials of the anticoagulant rodenticide WBA8119 against confined colonies of warfarin-resistant house mice (Mus musculus L.). Journal of Hygiene, 77(3), 427-431.
Rowe, F.P., Plant, C.J., & Bradfield, A. (1981). Trials of the anticoagulant rodenticides bromadiolone and difenacoum against the house mouse (Mus musculus L.). Journal of Hygiene, 87(2), 171-177.
RRAG (2012). RRAG house mouse resistance guideline. Derby, Rodenticide Resistance Action Group. Available at: https://bpca.org.uk/about/partners/rrag
Šćepović, T. (2015). Susceptibility of house mice (Mus musculus L.) to bromadiolone and control options. (PhD dissertation). Belgrade, Serbia: Faculty of Agriculture.
Sokal. R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research (3rd edition). New York, USA: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Team of authors. (2016). Pesticidi u poljoprivredi i šumarstvu u Srbiji (Pesticides in Agriculture and Forestry in Serbia). 18th edition. Belgrade, Serbia: Plant Protection Society of Serbia.
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1998). Reregistration Eligibility Decision – Rodenticide cluster. Washington DC: Author. Retrived from https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/reregistration/red_G-69_1-Sep-97.pdf
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2007). Pesticide fact sheet - Difenacoum. Washington DC: Author. Retrived from https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/registration/fs_PC-011901_01-Sep-07.pdf
Vukša, M., Draganić, M., Đedović, S., & Jokić, G. (2006). Laboratory effects and efficacy of a Se-based rodenticide in controlling rodents in storage facilities. In Proceedings of the 9th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, Brazilian Post-harvest association, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil (pp 920-925).
Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original.
Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in Pesticidi i fitomedicina (Pesticides and Phytomedicine) and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.