Systems of organic farming in spring vetch I: Biological response of sucking insect pests
Abstract
Four systems of organic farming and a conventional farming system were studied over
the period 2012-2014. The organic system trial variants included: I – an organic farming system without any biological products used (growth under natural soil fertility) – Control; II – an organic farming system involving the use of a biological foliar fertilizer and a biological plant growth regulator (Polyversum+Biofa); III – an organic farming system in which a biological insecticide (NeemAzal T/S) was used; IV – an organic farming system including a combination of three organic products: the foliar fertilizer, the plant growth regulator and the bioinsecticide (Polyversum+Biofa+NeemAzal T/S). Variant V represented a conventional farming system in which synthetic products were used in combination (foliar fertilizer, plant growth regulator and insecticide: Masterblend+Flordimex 420+Nurelle D). Treatment of vetch plants with the biological insecticide NeemAzal in combination with Biofa and Polyversum resulted in the lowest density of sucking pests, compared to all other organic farming methods tested (i.e. without NeemAzal, with NeemAzal alone, and its combination with Biofa and Polyversum). The greatest reduction in pest numbers during the vegetation period in that variant was observed in species of the order Thysanoptera (36.0-41.4%), followed by Hemiptera, and the families Aphididae (31.6-40.3%) and Cicadellidae (27.3-28.6%). This combination showed an efficient synergistic interaction and an increase in biological efficacy as compared to individual application of NeemAzal. The highest toxic impact was found against Thrips tabaci, followed by Acyrthosiphon pisum. An analysis of variance regarding the efficacy against the species A. pisum, E. pteridis and T. tabaci showed that type of treatment had the most dominant influence and statistically significant impact.
References
Abbott, W.S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18(2), 265-267.
Buss, E.A. & Park Brown, S. G. (2002). Natural products for managing landscape and garden pests in Florida (ENY-350). University of Florida/IFAS Extension. Retrieved January 15, 2015 from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/in/in19700.pdf.
Deka, S., Tanwar, R.K., Sumitha, R., Sabir, N., Bambawale, O. M. & Singh, B. (2011). Relative efficacy of agricultural spray oil and azadirachtin against two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) on cucumber (Cucumis sativus) under greenhouse and laboratory conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 81, 158-162.
Landis, D.A., Wratten, S.D. & Gurr, G.M. (2000). Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology, 45, 175-201.
Mascarin, G. M. & Delalibera, I.Jr. (2012). Insecticidal activity of the granulosis virus in combination with neem products and talc powder against the potato tuberworm Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Neotropical Entomology, 41, 223–231.
Nathan, S.S. & Kalaivani, K. (2006). Combined effects of azadirachtin and nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpltNPV) on Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Biological Control, 39, 96–104.
Nathan, S.S., Kalaivani, K. & Chung, P.G. (2005). The effects of azadirachtin and nucleopolyhedrovirus on midgut enzymatic profile of Spodoptera litura Fab. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 83, 46–57.
Pavela, R. (2009). Effectiveness of some botanical insecticides against Spodoptera littoralis Boisduvala (Lepidoptera: Noctudiae). Myzus persicae Sulzer (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Plant Protection Science, 45, 161-167.
Roush, R. & Tingey, W. (1994). Strategies for management of insect resistance to synthetic and microbial insecticides. In Geoffrey W. Zehnder, Mary L. Powelson, Richard K. Jansson & Kandukuri V. Raman, Advances in Potato Pest Biology and Management (237-254). St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society Press.
Schmutterer, H. (1990). Properties and potential of natural pesticides from the neem tree, Azadirachta indica. Annual Review of Entomology, 35, 271-297.
Whalon, M. E., Mota-Sanchez, D. & Hollingworth, R. M. (2008). Global pesticide resistance in arthropods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original.
Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in Pesticidi i fitomedicina (Pesticides and Phytomedicine) and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.