HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION CASES: A NEW PERSPECTIVE?

  • Taida Begić Sarkinović Modul University Vienna
Ključne reči: treaty-based investment arbitration, human rights law, international investment law, counterclaims, investor obligations

Sažetak


This article addresses recent human rights matters in the context of treaty-based investment arbitration. After having analyzed two recent arbitral awards, Urbaser v. Argentina and Bear Creek v. Peru, the article argues that host states’ counterclaims on the basis of human rights can serve as an effective vehicle for rebalancing investors’ rights and regulatory powers of host states. Both cases illustrate a more progressive approach of investment arbitral tribunals when dealing with human rights issues. Host states’ counterclaims can also provide a door for arbitrating corporate-related human rights violations in the sense that they can ensure the application of international human rights law in investment arbitration cases. International investment promotion for sustainable development requires rebalancing the rights and obligations of states and investors which could help ensure corporate human rights accountability. In this regard, international investment treaties have to be renegotiated in order to include more human rights content targeting investors’ human rights conduct and in that way provide a more balanced approach when disputes arise.

Reference

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aaken, A. van, 2008, Fragmentation of International Law: The Case of International Investment Protection, Finnish Yearbook of International Law (2008), Vol. XVII.

Amado, J. D., Kern, J. S., Doe, R. M, 2018, Arbitrating the Conduct of International Investors, Cambridge University Press.

Arcuri, A., The Great Asymmetry and the Rule of Law in International Investment Arbitration, in: Sachs, L., Johnson, L., Coleman, J. (eds.), 2018, Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy, Oxford University Press.

Baltag, C., 2018, Human Rights and Environmental Disputes in International Arbitration, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (24 July), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/07/24/human-rights-and-environmental-disputes-in-international-arbitration.

Brabandere, E.C.P.D.C. de, 2018, Human Rights Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration, (https://oxia.ouplaw.com/page/723).

Cassel, D., 2010, Opinion: Progress in the Newest UN Draft Treaty on Business and Human Rights, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/blog/progress-in-the-newest-un-draft-treaty-on-business-and-human-rights/?mc_cid=48b31d1ae9&mc_eid=a53d2c8cc7.

Choudhury, B., 2020, Investor Obligations for Human Rights, ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal (forthcoming), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3500991.

Coleman, J., Johnson, L., Sachs, L., Gupta, K., International Investment Agreements, 2015-2016: A Review of Trends and New Approaches in; Sachs, L., Johnson, L., (eds.), 2016, Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2015-2016, Oxford University Press.

Cotula, L., 2020, (Dis)integration in Global Resource Governance: Extractivism, Human Rights, and Investment Treaties, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol, 23, Issue 2.

Dupuy, P.M., Unification Rather than Fragmentation of International Law? The Case of International Investment Law and Human Rights Law in: Dupuy, P.M., Francioni, F., Petersmann, E.U., (eds.), 2009, Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration, Oxford University Press.

Franck, S., 2007, Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the Rule of Law, Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal, Vol. 19, Issue 2.

Gordon, K., 2008, International Investment Agreements: A Survey of Environmental, Labour and Anti-Corruption Issues, in: OECD International Investment Law: Understanding Concepts and Tracking Innovations, http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/40471550.pdf.

Gordon, K., Pohl, J., Bouchard, M., 2014, Investment Treaty Law, Sustainable Development and Responsible Business Conduct: A Fact Finding Survey, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, Issue 1.

Gazzini, T., 2017, Nigeria and Morocco Move Towards a “New Generation” of Bilateral Investment Treaties in: EJIL Talk, www.ejiltalk.org/nigeria-and-morocco-move-towards-a-new-generation-of-bilateral-investment-treaties.

Jorgenson, K. A., 2016, The Sociology of Ecologically Unequal Exchange, Foreign Investment Dependence and Environmental Load Displacement: Summary of the Literature and Implications for Sustainability, Journal of Political Ecology, Vol. 23, No. 1.

Kingsbury, B., Schill, S., 2010, Public Law Concepts to Balance Investors’ Rights with State Regulatory Actions in the Public Interest - The Concept of Proportionality’ in: Schill S. W., (ed.), 2010, International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford University Press.

Krajewski, M., (2020), A Nightmare or a Noble Dream? Establishing Investor Obligations Through Treaty-Making and Treaty-Application, Business and Human Rights Journal, Vol. 5, Issue 1.

Kube, V., Petersmann, E.U., 2016, Human Rights Law in International Investment Arbitration, AJWH, Vol. 11, Issue 1.

Mbengue, M. M., Schacherer, S., 2017, The ‘Africanization’ of International Investment Law: The Pan-African Investment Code and the Reform of the International Investment Regime in: The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 18, No. 3.

Miles, K., 2013, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment, and the Safeguarding of Capital, Cambridge University Press.

Paine, J., 2018, Bear Creek Mining Corporation v Republic of Peru: Judging the Social License of Foreign Investments and Applying New Style Investment Treaties, ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 33, Issue 2.

Páez-Salgado, D., Four Key Takeaways of the Decision in Bear Creek Mining Corp v Republic of Peru, (http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/12/16/bear-creek-mining-v-peru).

Peters, A., 2017, The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 15, Issue 3.

Pistor, K., 2019, The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality, Princeton University Press.

Pohl, J., 2018, Societal Benefits and Costs of International Investment Agreements: A Critical Review of Aspects and Available Empirical Evidence, OECD Working Papers on International Investment.

Santacroce, F. G., 2019, The Applicability of Human Rights Law in International Investment Disputes, ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 34, Issue 1.

Schill, S., 2009, The Multilateralization of International Investment Law, Cambridge University Press.

Schneiderman, D., 2014, Kate Miles. The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment, and the Safeguarding of Capital, European Journal of International Law, Cambridge University Press.

Simma, B., 2011, Foreign Investment Arbitration: A Place for Human Rights? International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 60, No. 3.

Schultz, T., Dupont, C., 2014, Investment Arbitration: Promoting the Rule of Law or Over-Empowering Investors? A Quantitative Empirical Study’, European Journal of International Law, 25 .

UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2015: Reforming International Investment Governance.

UNCITRAL Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform): Possible reform of investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) - Multiple proceedings and counterclaims, (https://undocs.org/en/A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.193).

INTERNATIONAL LAW SOURCES

Columbia Model Bilateral Investment Treaty (2017).

Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the European Union and its Member States (signed 30 October 2016, provisionally entered into force 21 September 2017).

Council of Europe, Resolution 1757 (2010) of the Parliamentary Assembly – Human Rights and Business.

ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, adopted by the Governing Body of the International Labour Office at its 204th Session (Geneva, November 1977) and amended at its 279th (November 2000), 295th (March 2006) and 329th (March 2017) Sessions, para.10 (d).

Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement between the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Government of the Republic of Singapore (2016 Nigeria-Singapore Bilateral Investment Treaty).

ISO 26000:2010 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility (https://www.iso.org/standard/42546.html)

Netherlands Model Bilateral Investment Treaty (2019).

OECD, 2011, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Part IV Human Rights, OECD Publishing.

Reciprocal Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Morocco and the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2016 Morocco-Nigeria Bilateral Investment Treaty):

UN, 2011, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework.

UN, (2016), Economic Commission for Africa, Draft Pan-African Investment Code.

CASE LAW

ICSID, Bear Creek Mining Corp v. Republic of Peru, Case No. ARB/14/21, Award of 30 November 2017.

ICSID, Bear Creek Mining Corp v. Republic of Peru, Partial Dissenting Opinion Professor Philippe Sands QC, Case No. ARB/14/21.

ICSID, Burlington Resources Inc. v. Republic of Ecuador, Case No. ARB/08/5.

Philip Morris Asia Limited v. The Commonwealth of Australia, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2012-12.

ECtHR, Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, App. No. 12742/87, 222 (ser. A) (1991).

ICSID, Urbaser S.A. and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v. The Argentine Republic, Case No. ARB/07/26, Award of 8 December 2016.

Objavljeno
2020/12/28
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak