CANARIES IN A COAL MINE: RULE OF LAW DEFICIENCIES AND MUTUAL TRUST
Sažetak
The value decline in the EU has manyfold consequences. It jeopardizes the very essence of Europe as a community of values. At the same time it endangers legal principles, such as mutual recognition, which is based on mutual trust presuming that all Member States are based on the rule of law and protect fundamental rights. Once trust is rebutted, Member States’ judicial authorities will refuse to cooperate and recognise each other’s judgments in order not to become complicit in individual rights violations and not to contradict the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. This paper argues that EU law must allow for such considerations and suspend mutual recognition-based laws not only on a case-by-case basis, as it happens today in practice, but in general with regard to Member States undergoing rule of law decline, in order to uphold the EU’s fundamental rights culture, ad EU law’s equivalency with the Convention’s human rights regime.
Reference
Bibliography
Ballegooij, W. van, Bárd, P., 2016, Mutual recognition and individual rights, Did the court get it right?, New Journal of European Criminal Law, Vol. 7, No. 4.
Ballegooij, W. van, 2015, The Nature of Mutual Recognition in European Law: Reexamining the Notion from an Individual Rights Perspective with a View to its Further Development in the Criminal Justice Area, Maastricht, Intersentia.
Bárd, P., Bodnar, A., 2021, The end of an era. The Polish Constitutional Court’s judgment on the primacy of EU law and its effects on mutual trust, CEPS Policy Insights No 15.
Bárd, P., Śledzińska-Simon, A., 2019, Rule of law infringement procedures - A proposal to extend the EU’s rule of law toolbox, CEPS Papers in Liberty and Security in Europe, No. 9.
Bárd, P., Ballegooij, W. van, 2018, Judicial independence as a pre-condition for mutual trust? The CJEU in Minister for Justice and Equality LM, New Journal of European Criminal Law, Vol. 9, No. 3.
Bárd, P., al., 2016, An EU mechanism on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights, Brussels, CEPS.
Bayer, J., al., 2019, Disinformation and propaganda – impact on the functioning of the rule of law in the EU and its Member States, Brussels, European Parliament, Policy Department C, Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs.
Belov, M.(ed.), The Role of Courts in Contemporary Legal Orders, The Hague, Eleven International Publishing.
Bugarič, B., 2014, Protecting Democracy and the Rule of Law in the European Union: The Hungarian Challenge, LEQS Paper, 79.
Carrera, S., Building a Common EU Justice Area: Reinforcing Trust and a Rights of Suspects-Centric Approach in Bárd, P., 2015, The European Arrest Warrant in Hungary, Budapest, OKRI.
Carrera, S., Guild, E., Hernanz, N., 2013, The Triangular Relationship between Fundamental Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law in the EU, Towards an EU Copenhagen Mechanism, Brussels, CEPS.
Closa, C., Kochenov, D., Weiler, J.H.H., 2014, Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper, No. 25.
Halmai, G., 2018, The possibility and desirability of economic sanction: Rule of law conditionality requirements against illiberal EU Member states, EUI Department of Law Research Paper, No. 6.
Hassemer, W., 2004, Strafrecht in einem europäischen Verfassungsvertrag, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 116, No. 2.
Kelemen, R.D., 2019, Is differentiation possible in rule of law?, Comparative European Politics, Vol. 17, 246–260 (2019)
Koncewicz, T.T., The Existential Jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union. An essay on the judicial incrementalism in defence of European First Principles inSzczepanowska-Kozłowska, K. (ed.), 2020, Profesor Marek Safjan znany i nieznany. Księga jubileuszowa z okazji siedemdziesiątych urodzin, Warsaw, C.H. Beck.
Krommendijk J.,Vries, G. de, 2021, Do Luxembourg and Strasbourg trust each other? The CJEU’s engagement with the jurisprudence of the ECtHR in AFSJ cases concerning mutual trust since 2017, presented at the ECPR General Conference, 3 September 2021.
Müller, J-W., 2015, Should the EU protect democracy and the rule of law inside Member States, European Law Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2.
Pech L., et al., 2019, Strengthening the Rule of Law Within the European Union: Diagnoses, Recommendations, and What to Avoid. RECONNECT – Reconciling Europe with its Citizens through Democracy and Rule of Law Reflection Paper No. 1.
Pech L., Scheppele K.L., 2017, Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19.
Scheppele, K.L., Enforcing the Basic Principles of EU Law through Systemic Infringement Procedures, in Closa, C. Kochenov, D. (eds.), 2016, Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge, CUP.
Sikk, A., 2020, BTI 2020, Trouble at the Top, Regional Report East-Central and Southeast Europe, Gütersloh, Bertelsman Stiftung.
V-Dem Institute, 2020, Autocratization Surges–Resistance Grows, V-Dem Annual Democracy Report, Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute.
Internet Sources
2021 Rule of Law Report, (https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/upholding-rule-law/rule-law/rule-law-mechanism/2021-rule-law-report/2021-rule-law-report-communication-and-country-chapters_en, last visited: 19.11.2021).
Ballegooij, W. van, Bárd, P., 2018, The CJEU in the Celmer case: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back for Upholding the Rule of Law Within the EU, VerfBlog, (https://verfassungsblog.de/the-cjeu-in-the-celmer-case-one-step-forward-two-steps-back-for-upholding-the-rule-of-law-within-the-eu/, last visited: 19.11.2021).
Bárd, P., 2021, The Sanctity of Preliminary References: An analysis of the CJEU decision C-564/19 IS, VerfBlog, (https://verfassungsblog.de/the-sanctity-of-preliminary-references/, 26.11.2021).
Bárd, P., Pech, L., 2019, How to build and consolidate a partly free pseudo democracy by constitutional means in three steps: The ‘Hungarian model’, RECONNECT Working Paper, No. 4, (https://reconnect-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/RECONNECT-WP4-final.pdf, last visited: 19.11.2021).
BTI 2020 Infographics, (https://www.bti-project.org/en/press.html, last visited: 19.11.2021).
BTI, The Transformation Index, (https://www.bti-project.org/en/home.html?&cb=00000, last visited: 19.11.2021)
Butler, I., 2018, Two proposals to promote and protect European values through the Multiannual Financial Framework: Conditionality of EU funds and a financial instrument to support NGOs, Civil Liberties Union for Europe, (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UG4PIg7tObjUoK9tBKq3IdqCT-eB5iM9/view, last visited: 19.11.2021).
Freedom House, (https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores, 11.2021, last visited: 19.11.2021)
Grabowska-Moroz, B., 2021, Strasbourg Court entered the rule of law battlefield – Xero Flor v Poland, Strasbourg Observers, (https://strasbourgobservers.com/2021/09/15/strasbourg-court-entered-the-rule-of-law-battlefield-xero-flor-v-poland/, last visited: 19.11.2021)
Kelemen, R.D., Scheppele, K.L., 2018, How to Stop Funding Autocracy in the EU, VerfBlog, (https://verfassungsblog.de/how-to-stop-funding-autocracy-in-the-eu/, last visited: 19.11.2021).
Makszimov, V., 2011, Hungary drops in Freedom House report, Euractiv, (https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/short_news/hungary-drops-in-freedom-house-report/, last visited: 19.11.2021)
Pech, L., 2021, Written submission in response to the Rule of Law call by the Joint Committee on European Union Affairs of the Houses of the Oireachtas, RECONNECT Policy Brief, (https://reconnect-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Policy-brief-LP-written-submission-in-response-to-the-call-22JAN21_update.pdf, last visited: 19.11.2021).
Pech, L., Kochenov, D., 2021, Respect for the Rule of Law in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice. A Casebook Overview of Key Judgments since the Portuguese Judges Case, SIEPS, 3, (https://www.sieps.se/globalassets/publikationer/2021/sieps-2021_3-eng-web.pdf?, last visited: 19.11.2021)
Pech, L., Wójcik, A., 2018, ”A Bad Workman always Blames his Tools”: an Interview with Laurent Pech, VerfBlog, (https://verfassungsblog.de/a-bad-workman-always-blames-his-tools-an-interview-with-laurent-pech/, last visited: 19.11.2021)
Scheppele, K.L., Kelemen, R.D., Morijn, J, 2021, The EU Commission has to Cut Funding to Hungary: The Legal Case, Report, Brussels, Greens/EFA Group, European Parliament, (https://danielfreund.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/220707_RoLCR_Report_digital.pdf, last visited: 19.11.2021)
The speech by Michael Ignatieff, Professor and then Rector and President of the Central European University chased out of Hungary by the government in the middle of the legal and political turmoil around the university’s presence in the country, (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoMd_Bxn5rg&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR2uHR_3m4w5DbB1ndIBRbvYHfHT_eIB9_V9kaaXvfi7_X16dDYclajnDEg, last visited: 19.11.2021)
UCL European Institute, 2020, Curing the virus of autocracy in Europe: Q+A with Daniel Kelemen’, UCL Europe Blog, https://ucleuropeblog.com/2020/12/07/curing-the-virus-of-autocracy-in-europe-qa-with-daniel-kelemen/, last visited: 19.11.2021)
V-Dem Institute, (https://www.v-dem.net/en/, last visited: 19.11.2021)
Viktor Orbán, Speech at Băile Tuşnad (Tusnádfürdő), (http://budapestbeacon.com/public-policy/full-text-of-viktor-orbans-speech-at-baile-tusnad-tusnadfurdo-of-26-july-2014/10592, last visited: 19.11.2021)
WJP Rule of Law Index 2020, (https://worldjusorg/our-work/research-and-data/wjp-rule-law-index-2020, last visited: 19.11.2021)
Legislative Sources
Treaty on the European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 47–390.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 391–407.
European Parliament resolution of 17 December 2020 on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027, the Interinstitutional Agreement, the EU Recovery Instrument and the Rule of Law Regulation (2020/2923(RSP) OJ C 445, 29.10.2021, p. 15–17.
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget, OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1–10.
Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters, OJ L 130, 1.5.2014, p. 1–36.
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, OJ L 347, 20.12.2013
2002/584/JHA: Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States - Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the Framework Decision, OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p. 1–20.
Case Law
ECtHR, XERO FLOR w POLSCE sp. z o.o. v. Poland, no. 4907/18, 7 May 2021
ECtHR, Bivolaru and Moldovan v. France, nos. 40324/16 and 12623/17, Judgement of 25 March 2021
ECtHR, Romeo Castaño v. Belgium, no. 8351/17, Judgement of 9 July 2019
ECtHR, Pirozzi v. Belgium, no. 21055/11, Judgement of 17 April 2018
ECtHR Avotiņš v. Latvia, no. 17502/07, Judgement of 23 May 2016.
ECtHR, Michaud France, no. 12323/11, Judgement of 6 December 2012.
ECtHR, Stapleton v Ireland, no. 56588/07, Judgement of 4 May 2010
ECtHR, Bosphorus v. Ireland, 45036/98, Judgement of 30 June 2006
CJEU, case C-657/21, Parliament v Commission, pending
CJEU, case C-204/21, Commission v Poland, pending
CJEU, case C-156/21, Hungary v Parliament and Council, 26 March 2021, pending
CJEU, case C-157/21 Hungary v Parliament and Council, 26 March 2021, pending
CJEU, case C-791/19, Commission v Poland (Régime disciplinaire des juges), 15 July 2021, ECLI:EU:C:2021:596
CJEU, case C-354/20 PPU Openbaar Ministerie (Indépendance de l’autorité judiciaire ’émission) L and P, 17 December 2020, ECLI:EU:C:2020:1033
CJEU, case C‑66/18, Commission v Hungary (Higher Education), 6 October 2020, ECLI:EU:C:2020:792
CJEU, joined cases C-558/18 and C-563/18 Miasto Łowicz, 26 March 2020, ECLI:EU:C:2020:234
CJEU, case C‑8/19 PPU RH, 12 February 2019, ECLI:EU:C:2019:110
CJEU, case C-216/18 PPU LM Minister for Justice and Equality (Deficiencies in the system of justice), 25 July 2018, ECLI:EU:C:2018:586
CJEU, case C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses (Portuguese Judges) 27 February 2018, EU:C:2018:117
CJEU, case C-614/14, Atanas Ognyanov, 5 July 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:514
CJEU, joined cases C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU – Aranyosi and Căldăraru, 5 April 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:198
CJEU, case Åkerberg Fransson, 7 May 2013, C-617/10, ECLI:EU:C:2013:105
CJEU, case C-294/83, Les Verts, 23 April 1986, EU:C:1986:166
Hungarian Constitutional Court, motion of 25 February 2021, pending, mkab.hu/dev/dontesek.nsf/0/1dad915853cbc33ac1258709005bb1a1/$FILE/X_477_0_2021_indítvány_anonim.pdf
Polish Constitutional Court, judgment K6/21, 24 November 2021, https://trybunal.gov.pl/en/hearings/judgments/art/11709-art-6-ust-1-zd-1-konwencji-o-ochronie-praw-czlowieka-i-podstawowych-wolnosci-w-zakresie-w-jakim-pojeciem-sad-obejmuje-trybunal-konstytucyjny
Polish Constitutional Court, judgment K3/21, 7 October 2021, https://trybunal.gov.pl/en/hearings/judgments/art/11662-ocena-zgodnosci-z-konstytucja-rp-wybranych-przepisow-traktatu-o-unii-europejskiej