THREE MODELS FOR ORDERING CONSTITUTIONAL ORDERS
Sažetak
The article explores constitutional transitions from the viewpoint of three explanatory and ordering paradigms proposed by the author. These are Westphalian constitutionalism, post-Westphalian constitutionalism and neo-Westphalian constitutionalism. The analysis focusses on the crisis of the two main paradigms of Westphalian Modernity – the territoriality of power and the hierarchy having projections on constitutional supremacy and political sovereignty. It explores how these two main forms of Westphalian constitutional geometry are challenged by globalism and neo-regionalism. The paper revolves around the metamorphoses of the pillars of constitutionalism in the context of globalization, as a holistic and universal project that has been unfolding in recent decades, and the current trends toward redefining globalization in terms of global regionalism and post-territorial technocratic governance.
Reference
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Avbelj, M., Komarek, J., 2012, Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, Oxford, Hart, pp. 1–424.
2. Beck, U., 1999, World Risk Society, Cambridge, Polity, pp. 1–192.
3. Belov, M., Rule of Law and Democracy in Times of Transitory Constitutionalism, Constitutional Polycrisis and Emergency Constitutionalism: Towards a Global Algorithmic Technocracy?, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2023, Rule of Law in Crisis Constitutionalism in a State of Flux, Abingdon, Routledge (forthcoming).
4. Belov, M., 2022, Constitutional Semiotics. The Conceptual Foundations of a Constitutional Theory and Meta-Theory, Oxford, Hart, pp. 241–315.
5. Belov, M, The Challenges to Westphalian Constitutional Geometry in the Age of Supranational Constitutionalism, Global Governance and Information Revolution, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2018, Global Constitutionalism and Its Challenges to Westphalian Constitutional Law, Oxford, Hart, pp. 13–55.
6. Belov M. (ed), 2021, The IT Revolution and its Impact on State, Constitutionalism and Public Law, Oxford, Hart, pp. 1–344.
7. Belov, M., Territory, Territoriality and Territorial Politics as Public Law Concepts, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2021, Territorial Politics and Secession. Constitutional and International Law Dimensions, London, Palgrave, pp. 15–45.
8. Belov M. (ed.), 2021, Territorial Politics and Secession. Constitutional and International Law Dimensions, London, Palgrave, pp. 1–316.
9. Belov, M., Rule of Law in Space of Flows, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2018, Rule of Law at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century, The Hague, Eleven, pp. 97–141.
10. Belov, M., Global Rule of Law instead of Global Democracy? Legitimacy of Global Judicial Empire on the Edge between Westphalian and Post-Westphalian Constitutionalism, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2019, The Role of Courts in Contemporary Legal Orders, The Hague, Eleven, pp. 99–133.
11. Belov, M., Revolution, Contestation and Transition: Towards a New Global Constitutional Order? The Global blog of the Graduate Institute of Geneva, (https://theglobal.blog/2019/01/14/revolution-contestation-and-transition-towards-a-new-global-constitutional-order/ style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 24px;">, 10. 11. 2022).
12. Benhabib, S., 2005, Borders, Boundaries and Citizenship, Political Science and Politics, Vol. 38, p. 674.
13. Blokker, P., 2019, Populism as a Constitutional Project, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 17, Issue 2.
14. Blokker, P., 2019, Populist Counter-Constitutionalism, Conservatism, and Legal Fundamentalism, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 15, Issue 3.
15. Blokker, P., 2019, Varieties of Populist Constitutionalism: The Transnational Dimension, German Law Journal, Vol. 20, Issue 3.
16. Blokker, P., 2018, Populist Constitutionalism, in: Torre, C. de la, (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Global Populism, London–New York, Routledge.
17. Brenner, N., 1999, Beyond State-Centrism? Space, Territoriality and Geographical Scale, Globalization Studies, Theory and Society, Vol. 28, Issue 1.
18. Brito Vieira, M., Runciman, D., 2008, Representation, Cambridge, Polity Press, pp. 29–63
19. Cananea, G. della, 2010, Is European Constitutionalism Really “Multilevel”?, ZaöRV, 70, pp. 283–317.
20. Casini, L., Global Administrative Law, in: Dunoff, J., Pollack, M., (eds.), 2019, International Legal Theory: Foundations and Frontiers, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, (https://ssrn.com/abstract=3328120 style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 24px;">, 10. 11. 2022).
21. Castells, M., 2009, The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 407–460.
22. Dobner, P., Loughlin, M., (eds.), 2010, Twilight of Constitutionalism?, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
23. Hart, H. L. A., 1997, The Concept of Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 124–136.
24. Heise, V., Pooling of Sovereignty – a New Approach?, in: Biscop, S., (ed.), 2005, E Pluribus Unum? Military Integration in the European Union Academia Press, pp. 43–53.
25. Hobsbawm, E., 1996, The Age of Revolution: 1789–1848, New York, Vintage, pp. 1–368.
26. Jellinek, G., 2010, Allgemeine Staatslehre, Nabu Press, pp. 1–835.
27. Kant, I, 2019, Eternal Peace: And Other International Essays, Wentworth Press, pp. 1–214.
28. Kivisto, P., Time-Space Compression, in: Ritzer G., (ed.) (2012) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization, Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell.
29. Klabbers, J., Palombella, G., 2019, The Challenge of Inter-Legality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
30. Lopez-Claros, A., Dahl, A., Groff, M., 2020, Global Governance and the Emergence of Global Institutions for the 21st Century, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–558.
31. MacCormick, N., 1993, Beyond the Sovereign State, The Modern Law Review, Vol. 56, pp. 1–18.
32. Pernice, I., 2015, Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 541–562, doi:10.1017/S1574019615000279.
33. Petersmann, E. U., 2017, Multilevel Constitutionalism for Multilevel Governance of Public Goods, Oxford, Hart, pp. 1–416.
34. Peterson, J., 1997, The European Union: Pooled Sovereignty, Divided Accountability, Political Studies, XLV, pp. 559–578.
35. Poiares Maduro, M., Contrapunctual Law: Europe’s Constitutional Pluralism in Action, in: Walker, N., (ed.), 2003, Sovereignty in Transition, Oxford, Hart.
36. Poiares Maduro, M., Three Claims of Constitutional Pluralism, in: Avbelj, M., Komarek, J., (eds.), 2012, Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, Oxford, Hart, pp. 67–84.
37. Přibáň, J., 2020, Constitutional Imaginaries. A Theory of European Societal Constitutionalism, Abingdon, Routledge, pp. 1–251.
38. Ragone, S., Territorial Politics of Regionalism in Italy between Integration and Disintegration in: Belov, M., (ed.) 2021, Territorial Politics and Secession. Constitutional and International Law Dimensions, London, Palgrave, pp. 191–215.
39. Sassen, S., The Global City, 2001, New York, London, Tokyo, Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 1–480
40. Sassen, S., 2013, When Territory Deborders Territoriality, Territory, Politics, Governance, Vol. 1, Issue 1, p. 23.
41. Sassen, S., From National Borders to Embedded Borderings: One Angle into the Question of Territory and Space in a Global Age, in: Been, W. de, Arora, P., Hildebrandt, M., (eds.), 2015, Crossroads in New Media, Identity and Law, London, Palgrave Macmillan, p. 17.
42. Schlegel, S. Activism as Defence: The Role of Courts in Shaping the Relationship between Constitutions and International Law: A Comparison of the Apex Courts of Switzerland, Germany and Austria, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2021, Courts and Judicial Activism under Crisis Conditions: Policy Making in a Time of Illiberalism and Emergency Constitutionalism, Abingdon, Routledge, pp. 43–61.
43. Skoutaris, N., Between Two Unions: Brexit and the Secessionist. Challenges in the UK, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2021, Territorial Politics and Secession. Constitutional and International Law Dimensions, London, Palgrave, pp. 165–191.
44. Solanes Mullor, J., The Catalan Secessionists’ Challenge: Reconciling Their Quest for Independence and Constitutionalism, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2021, Territorial Politics and Secession. Constitutional and International Law Dimensions, London, Palgrave, pp. 215–243.
45. Srnicek, N., 2016, Platform Capitalism, Cambridge, Polity Press, pp. 1–120.
46. Tanchev, E., The Contemporary Supranational Constitutional Pluralism or the Ordering of Constitutional Orders, in: Kirov, P., (ed.), 2014, Constitutional Studies 2012–2013, Sofia, St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, (in Bulgarian), pp. 171–198.
47. Taylor, P. J., 1994, The State as Container: Territoriality in the Modern World-System, Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 18, Issue 2, p. 2.
48. Taylor, P. J., 1995, Beyond Containers: Internationality, Interstateness, Interterritoriality, Progress in Human Geography, Vol.19, Issue 1, p. 1.
49. Teubner, G., 2012, Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 38–42.
50. Walker, N., 2008, Taking Constitutionalism beyond the State, Political Studies, Vol. 56, Issue 3, pp. 519–543.
51. Wallace, W, 1999, The Sharing of Sovereignty: The European Paradox, Political Studies, Vol. 47, Issue 3, pp. 503–521, doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00214.
52. Weber, M., 1968, Soziologie. Weltgeschichtliche Analysen. Politik, Stuttgart, Kröner Verlag, p. 151 etc.
53. Zeitlin, J., Nicoli, F., Laffan, B. 2019, Introduction: The European Union beyond the Polycrisis? Integration and Politicization in an Age of Shifting Cleavages, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 26, Issue 7, pp. 963–976.