CAN WE TALK ABOUT DIGITAL ECONOMY TAXATION WITHOUT IMPROVED ADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATION BETWEEN COUNTRIES?
Sažetak
Finding the right rules for taxation of corporate income in digital economy has been at the centre of attention of international tax community. Three proposals have received most attention, even though it is still uncertain whether any of them would be elected as a final solution. What these proposals show us is that in order to adopt new rules for taxation of digital economy, it is necessary to provide a functional global environment where information would be readily available and where countries would provide assistance in tax collection. However, existing mutual assistance instruments fall short of that. In this paper it is argued that current political momentum around the need to reach an international consensus should be used to enhance mutual assistance mechanisms. It is argued that CRS should become main global instrument for automatic exchange of information, or at least that CRS and FATCA rules should be harmonised so that there are no differences between them. Furthermore, it is argued that all countries should start providing assistance in tax collection based on OECD MAC. And secondly, it is argued that programs for technical assistance and capacity building offered by the OECD should be expanded so that more countries have access to them and that more resources are dedicated to each country.
Reference
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Ahrens, L., Bothner, F., 2020, The Big Bang: Tax Evasion after Automatic Exchange of Information under FATCA and CRS, New Political Economy, Vol. 25, No. 6.
2. Ahrens, L., Bothner, F., Hakelberg, L., Rixen, T., Capital Taxation and International Cooperation: The Causes and Consequences of Automatic Exchange of Information, in: Unger, B., Rossel, L., Ferwerda, J. (eds.), 2021, Combating Fiscal Fraud and Empowering Regulators: Bringing Tax Money back into the COFFERS, Oxford,Oxford University Press.
3. Auerbach, A., Devereux, M., Keen, M., Vella, J., 2017 a, Destination-Based Cash Flow Taxation, Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper, 14, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
4. Auerbach, A., Devereux, M., Keen, M., Vella, J., 2017 b, Destination-Based Cash Flow Taxation, Saïd Business School Research Papers, Working Paper Series.
5. Avi-Yonah, R., Xu, H., 2016, Evaluating BEPS: A Reconsideration of the Benefits Principle and Proposal for UN Oversight, Harvard Business Law Review, 2, p. 210.
6. Avi-Yonah, R., 2015, Hanging Together: A Multilateral Approach to Taxing Multinationals, Law & Economics Working Papers, Vol. 116.
7. Avi-Yonah, R., Savir, G., 2014, IGAs vs. MAATM: Has Tax Bilateralism Outlived Its Usefulness?, Law & Economics Working Papers, 95.
8. Baker, P., Czakert, E., Eijsden, A., Grau Ruiz, M. A., Kana, L., 2011, International Assistance in the Collection of Taxes, Bulletin for International Taxation, April/May.
9. Beer, S., Coelho, M., Leduc, S., 2019, Hidden Treasures: The Impact of Automatic Exchange of Information on Cross-Border Tax Evasion, IMF Working Paper, WP/19/286.
10. Brauner, Y., 2022, Editorial: Agreement? What Agreement? The 8 October 2021, OECD Statement in Perspective, Intertax, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 2–6.
11. Chand, V., 2019, Allocation of Taxing Rights in the Digitalized Economy: Assessment of Potential Policy Solutions and Recommendation for a Simplified Residual Profit Split Method, Intertax, Vol. 47, No. 12, pp. 1023–1041.
12. Cobham, A., Janský, P., Jonesc, C., Temourid, Y., 2021, An Evaluation of the Efects of the European Commission’s Proposals for the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base, Transnational Corporations, Vol. 28, No. 1.
13. Dagan, T., 2002, The Costs of International Tax Cooperation, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper, 13.
14. Devereux, M., Feria, R. de la, 2014, Defining and Implementing a Destination-Based Corporate Tax, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper, 14/07.
15. Emmenegger, P., 2017, Swiss Banking Secrecy and the Problem of International Cooperation in Tax Matters: A Nut Too Hard to Crack? Regulation and Governance, Vol. 11, No. 17.
16. European Commission, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the arrangements established by Council Directive 2010/24/EU of 16 March 2010 concerning mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures, Brussels, 18.12.2017 COM(2017) 778 final.
17. European Court of Auditors, 2021, Exchanging tax information in the EU: solid foundation, cracks in the implementation.
18. Gadžo, S., Klemenčić, I., 2017, Effective International Information Exchange as a Key Element of Modern Tax Systems: Promises and Pitfalls of the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard, Public Sector Economics, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 207–226.
19. Gaspar Committee, 2014, Report of the Commission Expert Group on Taxation of the Digital Economy, chaired by Vitor Gaspar, Brussels: European Commission.
20. Gravelle, J. G., 2022, Tax Havens: International Tax Avoidance and Evasion, Congressional Research Service Report, p. 37.
21. Grinberg, I., 2013, Taxing Capital Income in Emerging Countries: Will FATCA Open the Door?, World Tax Journal, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 319–322.
22. Ivanov, I., 2019, Automatska razmena obaveštenja u poreskoj materiji i pozicija Republike Srbije, Pravni život, 7–8.
23. Jestin, K., 2008, Mutual Legal Assistance in Tax Matters Recent Trends and Challenge Ahead.
24. Keen, M., Slemrod, J., 2021, Rebellion, Rascals, and Revenue, Tax Follies and Wisdom through the Ages, Princeton University Press.
25. Kostić, S.V., 2021, A Plea for a Workforce Presence PE Concept in a Post-Covid Digitalized World, Intertax, Vol. 49, No. 10, pp. 758–770.
26. Kostić, S. V., 2019, In Search of the Digital Nomad – Rethinking the Taxation of Employment Income under Tax Treaties, World Tax Journal, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 189–225.
27. Oberson, X., 2015, International Exchange of Information in Tax Matters: Towards Global Transparency, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing.
28. OECD/G20, 2015a, Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, Explanatory Statement, Final Reports.
29. OECD/G20, 2015b, Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, Action 1 2015, Final Report.
30. OECD/G20, 2021, Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, Statement on a Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy – 8 October 2021.
31. OECD/G20, 2022, Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, Progress Report on Amount A of Pillar One, Two Pillar Solution to the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy.
32. Picciotto, S., 2013, International Business Taxation, A Study in the Internationalization of Business Regulation, Cambridge University Press.
33. Roin, J., 2002, Taxation without Coordination, University of Chicago Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers, No. 20.
34. Thuronyi, V., 2001, International Tax Cooperation and a Multilateral Treat, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 26, Issue 4, pp. 1651–1653.
35. Turina, A., 2013, Information-based Administrative Tax-Cooperation, Consolidating Standards, Emerging Actors and Evolutionary Perspectives, Doctoral Thesis, Bocconi University, Italy.
36. Valderrama Mosquera, I. J., 2015, Legitimacy and the Making of International Tax Law: The Challenges of Multilateralism, World Tax Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, Section 5.1.
Internet Sources
1. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_2430"> style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="HR" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (1 November 2022).
2. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_16_3488"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (1 November 2022).
3. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/common-consolidated-corporate-tax-base-ccctb_en"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (1 November 2022).
4. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/taxation-1/tax-co-operation-and-control/general-overview/enhanced-administrative-cooperation-field-direct-taxation_en"> style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (1 November 2022).
5. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/fatca-countries"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (last visited 1 November 2022).
6. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-list-of-non-cooperative-jurisdictions/"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (1 November 2022).
7. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/corporations/foreign-account-tax-compliance-act-fatca"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (last visited 1 November 2022).
8. https://www.oecd.org/ctp/beps-2015-final-reports.htm"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (last visited: 26 October 2022).
9. https://www.oecd.org/ctp/treaties/model-tax-convention-on-income-and-on-capital-condensed-version-20745419.htm"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (1 November 2022).
10. https://www.oecd.org/tax/automatic-exchange/common-reporting-standard/"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (1 November 2022).
11. https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (26 October 2022).
12. https://www.oecd.org/tax/exchange-of-tax-information/convention-on-mutual-administrative-assistance-in-tax-matters.htm"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (1 November 2022).
13. https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/MDT_2017.pdf"> lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"> lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> (1 November 2022).
Legislative Sources
1. Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments.
2. Council Directive 2010/24/EU of 16 March 2010 concerning mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures, OJ L 84, 31 March 2010.
3. Council Directive 2014/107/EU of 9 December 2014 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation, OJ L 359, 16 December 2014.