SANKCIONISANJE GOVORA MRŽNJE NA INTERNETU: U POTRAZI ZA NAJBOLJIM PRISTUPOM
Abstract
Bezgranična priroda interneta, različiti nacionalni pristupi razumevanju šta je govor mržnje, kao i opasnost od ograničenja slobode govora otežavaju razvoj odgovarajućih mehanizama protiv ove pojave. Ograničenja međunarodnog prava u davanju univerzalne definicije govora mržnje zbog različitih nacionalnih pristupa slobodi izražavanja osujetila su pokušaje da se napravi efikasan međunarodni ugovor koji bi se bavio ovim pitanjem. Nametanje obaveza internet portalima da uspostave samoregulatorne mehanizme za brisanje sadržaja govora mržnje izazvalo je zabrinutost zbog neprimerene cenzure i ograničenja slobode izražavanja. Ovaj rad se fokusira na izazove sa kojima se susrećemo u borbi protiv govora mržnje na internetu i na moguće mehanizme za suzbijanje ove pojave.
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Akdeniz, Y., 2009, Racism on the Internet, Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing.
2. Alkiviadou, N., 2016, Regulating Internet Hate: A Flying Pig?, 7 JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 3, pp. 216–228.
Barron, J. A., 2019, Internet Access, Hate Speech and the First Amendment, First Amendment Law Review, Vol. 18, Symposium Issue, pp. 1–24.
Beširević, V., 2018, Catch Me if You Can: Reflections on Legal (un)accountability of Transnational Corporations for Human Rights Violations, Pravni zapisi, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 21–42.
Brown, A., 2017a, What Is Hate Speech? Part 1: The Myth of Hate, Law and Philosophy, Vol. 36, Issue 4, pp. 419–468.
Brown, A., 2017b, What Is so Special about Online (as Compared to Offline) Hate Speech, Ethnicities, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp297–326.
7. Chen, G., 2022, How Equalitarian Regulation of Online Hate Speech Turns Authoritarian: A Chinese Perspective, Journal of Media Law, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 159–179.
Cooke, L., 2007, Controlling the Net: European Approaches to Content and Access Regulation, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 360–376.
9. Crelling, K., 2017, The Confederate Battle Flag: Why Is It Perceived so Differently in the US and Europe/Germany,University of Washington.
10. Cuhna, A. V. M. de, Andrade, G. N. N. de, Lexinski, L., Feteira, T. L., 2013, New Technologies and Human Rights: Challenges to Regulation, Routledge.
11. Gilbert, O. de, Perez, N., Pablos, A. G., Cuadros, M., 2018, Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forum, Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2), Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. Goldbert, A., 2015, Hate Speech and Identity Politics in Germany, 1848–1914, Central European History, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 480–497.
13. Greer, S., 2000, The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion Under the European Convention on Human Rights, Human rights files, No. 17, Council of Europe.
14. Greer, S., 2000, The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion Under the European Convention on Human Rights, Human Rights Files, No. 17, Council of Europe, pp. 5–58.
15. Heldt, A., 2019, Reading Between the Lines and the Numbers: An Analysis of the First NetzDG Reports, Internet Policy Review, Vol. 8, No. 2.
16. Hemmert-Halswick, M., Lessons Learned from the First Years with the NetzDG, in: Bayer, J., Holznagel, B., Korpisaari, P., Woods, L. (eds.), 2021, Perspectives of Platform Regulation, Nomos, pp. 415–432.
17. Holmberg, E. S., 2021, Lessons from Trump’s Suspension: How Twitter Should Clarify and Strengthen Its “Public Interest” Approach to Moderating Leaders’ Violence-Inspiring Speech, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 310–334.
18. Keum, T. B., Miller, J. M., 2018, Racism on the Internet: Conceptualization and Recommendations for Research,Psychology of Violence, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 783–791.
19. Khan, A. R., 2013, Why Do Europeans Ban Hate Speech? A Debate Between Karl Loewenstein and Robert Post, https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr"> style="color: black; text-decoration: none;">Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 545–585.
20. Klonick, K., 2020, The Facebook Oversight Board: Creating an Independent Institution to Adjudicate Online Free Expression, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 129, No. 8, pp. 2418–2499.
21. Leerssen, P., Tworek H., 2019, An Analysis of Germany’s NetzDG Law, Translatlantic Working Group.
22. Liesching, M., et al., 2021, Das NetzDG in der praktischen Anwendung: Eine Teilevaluation des Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetzes, https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22502"> style="color: black; background-color: white; text-decoration: none;">Carl Grossmann Verlag.
23. Murphy, S. D. 2004, United States Practice in International Law: Volume 2, 2002–2004, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
24. Nockleby, T., Hate Speech, in: Levy, L., Karst, K., (eds.), 2000, Encyclopedia of the American Constitution,Encyclopaedia of the American Constitution, Macmillan Reference USA, pp. 1277–1279.
25. Školkay, A. 2015, Media Policy for a New Media Environment: The Approaches of International Organizations and the EU towards the Regulation of New Online Media Services, School of Communication and Media, n.o.
26. Temperman, J., 2015, Religious Hatred and International Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
27. Trier, T., Samasile, E., 2005, ‘Towards Ratification’ Conference on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorites, European Centre for Minority Issues.
28. Ubanga, C., 2016, Hate Speech in Cyberspace: Why Education Is Better than Regulation, Social Science Research Network.
29. Vukčević, I., 2021, http://pravnizapisi.rs/wp-content/uploads/issues/1-2021/PZ%202021-01%20-%2013%20Vukcevic.pdf"> style="color: black; text-decoration: none;">Facebook Oversight Board’s Decision on the Indefinite Suspension of Donald Trump’s Account, Pravni zapisi, Vol. XII, No. 1, pp. 295–311.
30. Walker, J., 2010, Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, Anti-Hate Laws and Freedom of Expression, Ottawa, Ontario, Library of Parliament.
31. Walker, C., Akdeniz, Y., 1999. The Governance of the Internet in Europe with Special Reference to Illegal and Harmful Content, Criminal Law Review, December Special Edition, pp. 15–19.
Watson, K. M., 2020, The United States’ Hollow Commitment to Eradicating Global Racial Discrimination, Human Rights.
33. Wilson, A. R., Land, M., 2021, Hate Speech on Social Media: Content Moderation in Context, Connecticut Law Review,, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 1029–1242.
Windisch, S. et al., 2022, Online Interventions for Reducing Hate Speech and Cyberhate: A Systematic Review,Campbell Systematic Reviews, Vol. 17, No. e1133, pp. 1–17.
35. Yar, M., 2018, A Failure to Regulate? The Demands and Dilemmas of Tackling Illegal Content and Behavior on Social Media, International Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence and Cybercrime, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 5–20.
LEGISLATIVE SOURCES
Canadian Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46.
Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 98/06.
Law on the Prohibition of Discrimination in the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 22/09.
Criminal Code, Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 85/05, 88/05 - corr., 107/05 - corr., 72/09, 111/09, 121/12, 104/13, 108/14, 94/16 and 35/19.
U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, First Amendment, Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, Petition (1791).
New York State Senate Bill S8298B.
Communication Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. (1996).
German Criminal Code, Federal Law Gazette I, p. 3322, as last amended by Article 2 of the Act of 19 June 2019, Federal Law Gazette I.
Network Enforcement Act (Netzdurchsetzunggesetz, NetzDG), Federal Law Gazette I, p. 3352 ff.
Protection of Young Persons Act, (Jugendschutzgesetz), Federal Law Gazette I.
Broadcasting Interstate Agreement, (Rundfunkstaatsvertrag), dated 31 August 1991 (incorporating the third amendment adopted between 26 August and 11 September 1996.
Gesetz zur Änderung des Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetzes, Art. 2, d) 9, (http://perma.cc/9W8E-GSWM, 15 September 2022).
Code pénal Version consolidé au 1 janvier 2020.
Proposition de loi visant à lutter contre les contenus haineux sur internet, Texte adopté n° 419.
Loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberté de la presse, Version en vigueur au 03 octobre 2022.
UN General Assembly, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, UN doc. Resolution 2200A (XXI) (16 December 1966).
UN General Assembly, International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), UN doc. Resolution 2106 (21 December 1965).
Human Rights Committee, Resolution 20/8 on the Internet and Human Rights, UN doc. A/HRC/RES/20/8 (16 July 2012).
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 34, UN doc. CCPR/C/GC/34 (12 September 2011).
Human Rights Committee, Concluding observations on the seventh periodic report of Germany, UN doc. CCPR/C/DEU/CO/7 (30 November 2021).
African Union, African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (27 June 1981).
Council of Europe, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, ETS 5 (4 November 1950).
Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation No. R (97) 20 (30 October 1997).
Council of Europe, Convention on Cybercrime, ETS No. 185 (8 November 2001).
Council of Europe, Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems, ETS 189 (28 January 2003).
Council of Europe, Explanatory report to the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems, ETS 189 (28 January 2003).
Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation Rec (2001) 8 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on self-regulation concerning cyber content (5 September 2001).
Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Declaration on freedom of communication on the Internet, the Committee of Ministers (28 May 2003).
Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation Rec (2008) 6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on measures to promote the respect for freedom of expression and information with regard to Internet filters (26 March 2008).
European Parliament and the Council Decision No. 854/2005/EC of 11 May 2005, establishing a multiannual Community Programme on promoting safer use of the Internet and new online technologies.
Council Framework Decision Amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 6 November 2007 on combating terrorism: Impact Assessment.
Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008, on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law.
Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services.
EU Directive 2006/24/E on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/E., Official Journal of the European Union L 105/54.
European Commission Communication COM (2021) 777 final of 9 December 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/communication-extending-eu-crimes-hate-speech-and-hate-crime_en"> style="color: black; text-decoration: none;">A more inclusive and protective Europe: extending the list of EU crimes to hate speech and hate crime.
CASE LAW
European Court of Human Rights
ECtHR, Handyside v. the United Kingdom, No. 5493/72, Judgment of 7 December 1976.
2. ECtHR, Magyar Jeti ZRT v. Hungary, No. 11257/16, Judgment of 4 December 2018.
Canada
1. Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Citron et al. v. Zündel, T.D. 1/02 2002/01/18, Decision of 18 January 2002.
US
U.S. Supreme Court, Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942), Decision of 9 March 1942, at 572.
2. U.S. Supreme Court, Roth v. United States, No. 582, Decision of 24 June 1975.
3. U.S. Supreme Court, New York v. Ferber No. 81-55, Decision of 2 July 1982.
4. U.S. Supreme Court, Beauharnais v. Illinois, No. 118, Decision of 28 April 1952.
5. U.S. Supreme Court, Watts v. United States, No. 21528, Decision of 25 September 1968.
6. U.S. Supreme Court, Virginia v. Black, No. 01-1107, Decision of 7 April 2003.
7. District Court for the Northern District of California, Yahoo!, Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme 169 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (N.D. Cal. 2001), Decision of 7 November 2001, 1188–90.
France
Conseil constitutionnel, https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/2020/2020801DC.htm"> lang="FR" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: black; background-color: white; text-decoration: none;">Décision n° 2020-801 DC du 18 juin 2020.
2. Tribunal de Grande Instance (High Court), UEJF and Licra v. Yahoo! Inc and Yahoo France, RG 05308 UEJF and Licra v. Yahoo! Inc and Yahoo France, RG 05308, Decision of 22 May 2000.
REPORTS AND PUBLICATIONS
1. UN General Assembly, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, UN doc. A/74/486 (9 October 2019).
2. Secretary-General, United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech: detailed guidance on implementation for United Nations field presences (http://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3889286?ln=zh_CN, 22 August 2022).
3. Secretary-General, The fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and the comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, UN doc. A/58/313 (22 August 2003).
4. World Summit on the Information Society, Geneva 2003 – Tunis 2005, Declaration of Principles: building the information society: a global challenge in the new millennium, UN doc. WSIS-03/GENEVA/DOC/4 (12 December 2003).
5. Tunis Agenda for the Information Society, UN doc. WSIS-05/TUNIS/DOC/6(Rev.1)-E (18 November 2005).
6. OSCE-ODIHR, 2010, Report of OSCE-ODIHR activities on hate on the internet(https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/8/7/73461.pdf, 24 September 2022).
7. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 2008, Hate in the Information Age, Briefing of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe,(https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-110jhrg75645/html/CHRG-110jhrg75645.htm, 23 September 2022).
8. OSCE, Permanent Council, Decision No. 633. Promoting Tolerance and Media Freedom on the Internet (11 November 2004).
INTERNET SOURCES
1. Cuevas, S., 2009, Neo-Nazi Rallies Provoke “Anger, Fear”, NPR (https://www.npr.org/2009/11/07/120129726/neo-nazi-rallies-provoke-anger-fear lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: black;">, 8. 12. 2022).
2. https://www.statista.com/aboutus/our-research-commitment"> style="color: black; text-decoration: none;">Statista Research Department, 2022, U.S. teens encountering hate speech on social media 2018, by type(https://www.statista.com/statistics/945392/teenagers-who-encounter-hate-speech-online-social-media-usa/, 13. 9. 2022).
3. Laub, Z., 2019, Hate Speech on Social Media: Global Comparisons, Council on Foreign Relations (https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/hate-speech-social-media-global-comparisons, 13. 9. 2022)
Yosie, M., 2012, http://www.slaw.ca/2012/06/14/section-13-of-the-canadian-human-rights-act-repealed/"> style="color: black; text-decoration: none;">Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act Repealed!?, Slaw(https://slaw.ca/2012/06/14/section-13-of-the-canadian-human-rights-act-repealed/, 16. 09. 2022).
5. Petaković, M., 2015, Presuda zbog govora mržnje na internetu, Blic (https://www.blic.rs/vesti/hronika/presuda-zbog-govora-mrznje-na-internetu/lg3etnr"> style="color: black; text-decoration: none;">, 16. 9. 2022).
6. United Nations, United Nations Establishes Working Group on Internet Governance, PI/1620 (https://press.un.org/en/2004/pi1620.doc.htm, 18. 9. 2022).
7. European Commission, 2022, EU Code of Conduct against online hate speech: latest evaluation shows slowdown in progress (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/da/ip_22_7109, 1. 12. 2022)
8. Facebook’s Terms of Use and User Conduct Policy (https://www.facebook.com/legal/terms, 23. 9. 2022).
9. Blogger Report Abuse Page (https://www.blogger.com/report?hl=en&visit_id=637995231999443134-3081178069&rd=1, 12 September 2022).
10. Jugendshutz.net (https://http://www.jugendschutz.net/en/"> style="color: black; text-decoration: none;">www.jugendschutz.net/en/, 3. 10. 2022).
11. International Cyber Security Protection Alliance (https://www.cybersecurityintelligence.com, 11. 5. 2022).