SHVATANJE ŽENSKIH PRAVA OZBILJNO: BORBA ŽENA ZA NOVI „DRUŠTVENI UGOVOR“ U POLJSKOJ

  • Anna Śledzińska-Simon Professor, University of Wrocław, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics, Poland
  • Anna Wójcik Assistant Professor, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Law Studies, Poland
Ključne reči: demokratizacija, demokratsko nazadovanje, Poljska, Ustavni sud, žensko pravo, abortus, reproduktivna prava, društveni ugovor

Sažetak


Ovaj članak prati tok borbe za prava žena u Poljskoj od 1989. do danas. U njemu se tvrdi da je demokratska tranzicija uspešno oblikovala temelje liberalnog režima, ali da je od samog početka bila praćena sporazumom između vlade i Katoličke crkve koji je ograničio reproduktivna prava i doveo do vraćanja tradicionalnim rodnim ulogama. Ovaj kontekst je ključan za razumevanje tumačenja Ustavnog suda, koji je ojačao neku vrstu ugovora o rodu, nastojeći da primiri žene. Promena vlasti 2015. godine znatno je oslabila garancije vladavine prava i dodatno umanjila re- produktivna prava, što je izazvalo masovne proteste i mobilizaciju demokratske opozicije. U članku se tvrdi da svrgavanje neliberalnog režima na nedavnim parlamentarnim izborima označava početak novog društvenog ugovora u Poljskoj, u kojem se prava žena shvataju ozbiljno.

Reference

Bibliography

Adamski, D., 2019, The Social Contract of Democratic Backsliding in the “New EU” Countries, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 628–629.

Baranowska, M., Fiktus, P., 2022, Dyskurs polityczny i prawny o ustawie z 27 kwietnia 1956 r., Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 253–278.

Barnard, C., The ‘Opt-Out’ for the UK and Poland from the Charter of Funda- mental Rights: Triumph of Rhetoric over Reality?, in: Griller, S., Ziller, J., (eds.), 2008, The Lisbon Treaty, Vienna, Springer, pp. 257–283.

Belov, M., 2021, Populist Constitutionalism and Illiberal Democracies: Between Constitutional Imagination, Normative Entrenchment and Political Reality, Cambridge, Intersentia.

Bień-Kacała, A., 2022, Nieliberalny sąd konstytucyjny w Polsce na przykładzie wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego w sprawie aborcyjnej, sygn. akt K 1/20, Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, No. 5(69), pp. 15–27.

Bień-Kacała, A., Drinóczi, T., Abortion Law and Illiberal Courts: Spotlight on Poland and Hungary, in: Ziegler, M., (ed.), 2023, Research Handbook on Interna- tional Abortion Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 263–282.

Bodnar, A., 2021, “For My Enemies: The Law”. The Interpretation of the Law by the PiS Government in Poland, Osteuropa, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 99–114.

Bodnar, A., The Role of Polish Civil Society in Supporting EU Activities as Regards Protection of Judicial Independence and Other Elements of the Rule of Law, in: Meier, K., Lorenz, A., Wendel, M., (eds.), 2023, Rule of Law and the Judiciary, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, pp. 167–180.

Bucholc, M., 2022, Abortion Law and Human Rights in Poland: The Closing of the Jurisprudential Horizon, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 73–99.

Bucholc, M., Gospodarczyk, M., Feminist Mobilization, Abortion Law and Political Images of Womanhood: Feminists as “the Worst Minority”, in: Bucholc, M., (ed.), 2024, Established-Outsiders Relations in Poland: Reconfiguring Elias and Scotson, Cham, Springer International Publishing, pp. 143–175.

Búrca, G. de, Young, K. G., 2023, The (mis)appropriation of Human Rights by the New Global Right: An Introduction to the Symposium, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 205–223.

Drinóczi, T., Bień-Kacała, A., 2021, Illiberal Constitutionalism in Hungary and Poland, London, Routledge.

Dzido M., Śliwowski P., 2014, Solidarność według kobiet (documentary film).

Elgar, R., 2014, Women’s Rights in Transition: The Collision of Feminist Interest Groups, Religion and Non-Governmental Organizations in Three Latin American Countries, Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 14, Nos. 3–4, pp. 359–368.

Fuszara, M., 2013, Women’s Movements in Poland, in: Scott, J. W., Kaplan, C., Keates, D., (eds.), 2013, Transitions Environments Translations. Feminism in International Politics, New York, London, Routledge, pp. 128–142.

Fuszara, M., Polish Women’s Fight for Suffrage, in: Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., Ru- bio-Marín, R., (eds.), 2012, The Struggle for Female Suffrage in Europe: Voting to Become Citizens, Leiden, Boston, Brill, p. 143.

Fuszara, M., Will the Abortion Issue Give Birth to Feminism in Poland?, in: McLean, M., Groves, D., (eds.), 1991, Women’s Issues in Social Policy, New York, Routledge.

Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A., Sadurski, W., 2021, The Judgment that Wasn’t (But Which Nearly Brought Poland to a Standstill): ‘Judgment’ of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of 22 October 2020, K 1/20, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 130–153.

Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A., Sadurski, W., 2023, Is It Polexit Yet? Comment on Case K 3/21 of 7 October 2021 by the Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 163–181.

Godzisz, P., The Journey and Horizon: Reflecting on the Progress and Prospects of Anti-LGBT Hate Crime Governance in Poland and Beyond, in: Godzisz, P., 2024, State Responses to Anti-LGBT Violence: Poland in a European Context, London, Springer Nature, pp. 291–304.

Graff, A., 2001, Świat Bez Kobiet. Płeć w Polskim Życiu Politycznym, Warsaw, Wydawnictwo Marginesy.

Graff, A., Karolczuk, E., 2021, Anti-Gender Politics in the Populist Moment, London, Routledge.

Grabowska-Moroz, B., Wójcik, A., 2021, Reframing LGBT Rights Advocacy in the Context of the Rule of Law Backsliding: The Case of Poland, Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 85–103.

Halmai, G., 2023, Rule of Law Backsliding and Memory Politics in Hungary, Eu- ropean Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 602–622.

Halmai, G., The Making of “Illiberal Constitutionalism” with or without a New Constitution: The case of Hungary and Poland, in: Landau, D. et al., (eds.), 2019, Comparative Constitution Making, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 302–323.

Huntington, S., 1991, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, University of Oklahoma Press.

Ingbrandt, R., “Gender Restoration” and “Masculinisation” of Political Life in Poland: The Controversies over the Abortion Legislation after 1989, in: Gradskova, Y., Morell Asztalos, I., (eds.), 2018, Gendering Postsocialism: Old Legacies and New Hierarchies, Abingdon, New York, Routledge, p. 194.

Jarska, N., 2015, Kobiety z Marmuru. Robotnice w Polsce w Latach 1945–1960, Warsaw, Instytut Pamięci Narodowej.

Kapelańska-Pręgowska, J., 2021, The Scales of the European Court of Human Rights: Abortion Restriction in Poland, the European Consensus, and the State’s Margin of Appreciation, Health and Human Rights, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 213–224.

Kondratowicz, E., 2001, Szminka Na Sztandarze. Kobiety Solidarności 1980–1989: Rozmowy, Warsaw, Wydawnictwo Dedal.

Krajewska, A., 2021, Connecting Reproductive Rights, Democracy, and the Rule of Law: Lessons from Poland in Times of COVID-19, German Law Journal, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 1072–1097.

Krajewski, M., 2023, The Constitutional Quandary of Social Rights: Questions in Times of The Polish Illiberal Turn, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 156–186.

Kustra-Rogatka, A., 2023, The Hypocrisy of Authoritarian Populism in Poland: Between the Facade Rhetoric of Political Constitutionalism and the Actual Abuse of Apex Courts, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 521–548.

Landau, D., Gargarella, R., The Latin American Contribution to Comparative Constitutional Law, in: Ginsburg, T., Dixon, R., (eds.), 2011, Comparative Constitutional Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 451–471.

Levitsky, S., Ziblatt, D., 2018, How Democracies Die, New York, Crown.

Lopatin, E., 2020, Protecting LGBTQ Rights in Illiberal Poland, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 485–520.

Madon-Mitzkiewicz, L., Abortion Laws in Poland and in Europe and Their Impact on Human Rights, in: Nowak, M., (ed.), 2019, European Yearbook on Human Rights, Vienna, Intersentia, pp. 213–241.

Madon-Mitzkiewicz, L., Jasiński, F., 2021, Reproductive Rights in Poland: The Impact of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Union, in: Herring, J., Clough, A., (eds.), 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Reproductive Ethics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 307–328.

Marczyk, A., Piekarska-Bono, M., (eds.), 2023, Continuity and Change in the Family in Poland: Intergenerational Relations and Children’s Wellbeing, Cham, Springer International Publishing.

McLean, M., 1991, Women’s Issues in Social Policy, in: McLean, M., Groves, D., (eds.), 1991, Women’s Issues in Social Policy, New York, Routledge.

Musiał-Karg, M., 2016, Polityka a religia w Polsce. Aborcja w dyskursie politycznym, in: Konarski, X. et al., (eds.), 2016, Między Prawdą A Pragmatyzmem: Studia Z Filozofii I Polityki, Warsaw, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, pp. 89–104.

Nowicka, W., 1996, The Anti-Abortion Act in Poland, Reproductive Health Matters, Vol. 4, No. 8, pp. 35–42.

Nowicka, W., The Anti-Abortion Law in Poland, in: Reingard, H., (ed.), 1997, The New Conservatism in Poland, Zagreb, Hoguet Verlag, pp. 61–76.

Pető, A., 2021, Gender and Illiberalism in Post-1989 Central and Eastern Europe, London, Routledge.

Rady, M., 2016, The Central European Legal Tradition, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 64.

Sadurski, W., 2019, Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Safjan, M., 2016, The Rule of Law and the Rise of Populism: A Case Study of Poland, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 299–322.

Skocpol, T., 1995, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, Cambridge, Belknap Press.

Williams, K., 1998, Women in the Nazi East: How Gender, Race and Policy Converged, Oxford, Berg.

Wysocki, M., 2023, Polish Political Discourse on Abortion, Abingdon, New York, Routledge.

Żuk, P., Żuk, P., 2020, The Poland of Our Grandchildren: A Backward or a Pro- gressive Country? Populist Anti-Gender Discourse in Polish Politics, Social Poli- tics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 694–723.

Legal Acts

Act of 26 January 1974 – Labor Code, Official Journal of Poland 2022, item 1510.

Act of 3 December 2010 on the Implementation of Certain Provisions of the European Union on Equal Treatment, Official Journal of Poland 2010, No. 254, item 1700.

Act of 5 January 2011 – Electoral Code, Official Journal of Poland 2022, item 1277.

Act of 7 January 1993 on Family Planning, Protection of the Human Fetus and Conditions for the Permissibility of Termination of Pregnancy (“Fetus Protection Act”), Official Journal of Poland, No. 17, item 78.

Act of 30 August 1996 amending the Fetus Protection Act, Official Journal of Po- land No. 139, item 646.

Constitutional Act of 17 October 1992 on Mutual Relations between the Legislative and Executive Powers of the Republic of Poland and on Local Self-Government, Official Journal of Poland 1992, No. 84, item 426 (“Small Constitution”).

Constitution of the People’s Republic, 1952.

Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997, Official Journal of Poland 1997, No. 78, item 483.

Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, OJ 2004 L 373, p. 37.

Directive 2006/54/EC of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast), OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23.

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measures, COM/2012/0614 final.

Protocol No. 30 on the Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom, Official Journal of Poland 115, 09 May 2008, pp. 313–314.

Case Law

The Polish Constitutional Tribunal (chronologically)

CT, Decision No. P 2/87, sec. IV. (2 January 1987).

CT, Decision No. P 2/87 (3 March 1987).

CT, Decision No. K 6/89 (24 October 1989).

CT, Decision No. Kw 5/91 (24 September 1991).

CT, Decision No. U 1/92 (7 October 1992).

CT, Decision No. K 26/96 (28 May 1997).

CT, Decision No. 15/97 (27 September 1997).

CT, Decision No. K 26/97 (26 November 1997).

CT, Judgment No. P 8/98 (6 July 1999).

CT, judgment No. K 27/99 (28 March 2000).

CT judgment No. K 15/99 (13 June 2000).

CT judgment No. K 35/99 (15 December 2000).

CT, Judgment No. K 18/04 (11 May 2005).

CT, Judgment No. 10/07 (24 October 2007).

CT judgment K 33/07 (11 December 2008).

CT, Judgment No. K 63/07 (15 July 2010).

CT, Decision No. S 2/10 (15 July 2010).

CT, Judgment No. K 32/09 (24 November 2010).

CT, Judgment No. K 43/12 (7 May 2014).

CT, Judgment No. SK 54/13 (6 October 2015).

CT, Judgment No. K 12/14 (7 October 2015).

CT, Judgment No. K 1/20 (10 October 2020).

European Court of Human Rights (chronologically)

ECtHR, Tysiąc v. Poland, App. No. 5410/03, Judgment of 20 May 2007.

ECtHR, R. R. v. Poland, App. No. 27617/04, Judgment of 26 May 2011.

ECtHR, P. and S. v. Poland, App. No. 57375/08, Judgment of 30 October 2012.

ECtHR,Rabczewskav.Poland,App.No.8257/13,Judgmentof15September 2022.

Internet Sources

Amnesty International, 2022, They Treated Us as Criminals. From Shrinking Space to Harassment of LGBTI Activities, (https://www.amnesty.org.pl/wp-con- tent/uploads/2022/07/THEY-TREATED-US-LIKE-CIMINALS-report-on-LGB- TI-activists-in-Poland-Amnesty-International-EUR3758822022english.pdf, 12. 4. 2024).

AP, 2024, Poland’s President Vetoes Law on Free Access to Morning-after Pill for Ages 15 and above, AP, (https://apnews.com/article/poland-morning-af- ter-pill-law-president-vetofe41d1c97ea3e0151d67278e67c0512a, 6. 6. 2024).

Sieradzka, M., Were Women Key to Voting out Poland’s Ruling Conservatives?, Deutsche Welle, (https://www.dw.com/en/were-women-key-to-voting-out-polands-ruling-conservatives/a-67214867, 12. 4. 2024).

Sowa, J., 2018, Populism or Capitalist Demodernization at the Semi-periphery: The Case of Poland, Non-Site, No. 23, (https://nonsite.org/populism-or-capital-ist-de-modernization-at-the-semi-periphery/, 12. 4. 2024).

Szczerbiak, A., 2019, Why Is Poland’s Law and Justice Party still so Popular, LSE Blog, (https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2019/10/01/why-is-polands-law-and-jus-tice-party-still-so-popular/, 12. 4. 2024).

Other Sources

Centrum Badań Opinii Społecznej, 1992, Opinia społeczna o przerywaniu ciąży. Komunikat z badań.

Centrum Badań Opinii Społecznej, 2022, Dlaczego Polacy odchodzą z Kościoła?. Komunikat z badań No. 105.

IBRiS, 2020, Którym instytucjom Polacy ufają najbardziej. Komunikat z badań. Listopad.

IBRiS, 2022, Którym instytucjom Polacy ufają najbardziej, Opinion Poll (Nov. 2020).

Objavljeno
2024/07/09
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak