RESISTING THE ALLURE OF FUTURE GENERATIONS’ “RIGHTS”
Sažetak
The language of future generations (FG) has become prominent in climate litigation; they are increasingly being treated as present rightsholders. Using a constitutional perspective, the paper argues that FG cannot function as present right- sholders since the category is legally vague, conceptually unstable, and epistemically indeterminate, preventing identification of rightsholders, specification of the scope of rights, and their operationalization in adjudication. The paper further shows that reliance on FG rights is neither necessary nor effective in tackling climate change, risking the shift of attention away from present duties and responsibility. Constitutional rights frameworks already contain objective norms and state duties that can safeguard future conditions without attributing rights to non-existing individuals. The paper argues we should resist the allure of FG rights and focus on legally coherent tools capable of advancing inter- and intragenerational justice.
Reference
Bibliography
Alexy, R., 1990, Grundrecht als subjektive Rechte und als objektive Normen, Der Staat, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 49–68.
Anthis, J. R., Paez, E., 2021, Moral Circle Expansion: A Promising Strategy to Impact the Far Future, Futures, Vol. 130, p. 102756.
Araújo, R., Koessler, L., 2021, The Rise of the Constitutional Protection of Future Generations, LPP Working Paper, No. 7.
Atapattu, S., Intergenerational Equity and Children’s Rights: The Role of Sustain- able Development and Justice, in: Fenton-Glynn, C., (ed.), 2019, Children’s Rights and Sustainable Development: Interpreting the UNCRC for Future Generations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–191.
Barresi, P. A., 1997, Beyond Fairness to Future Generations: An Intragenerational Alternative to Intergenerational Equity in the International Environmental Arena, Tulane Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 59–88.
Basson, G. et al., 2025, Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on the Hu- man Rights of Future Generations, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 754–1006.
Beckerman, W., Pasek, J., 2001, Justice, Posterity, and the Environment, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Beckman, L., 2015, Political Representation of Future Generations and Collective Responsibility, Jurisprudence, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 516–534.
Böckenförde, E. W., 1990, Grundrechte als Grundsatznormen: Zur gegenwärtigen Lage der Grundrechtsdogmatik, Der Staat, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1–31.
Borras, S., 2016, New Transitions from Human Rights to the Environment to the Rights of Nature, Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 113–143.
Bosselmann, K., 2022, Human Rights and Responsibilities Towards the Earth Sys- tem, Environmental Policy and Law, Vol. 53, No. 3–4, pp. 213–222.
Bosselmann, K., Earth Democracy: Institutionalizing Sustainability and Ecologi- cal Integrity, in: Engel, J. R., Westra, L., Bosselmann, K., (eds.), 2010, Democracy, Ecological Integrity and International Law, Cambridge, Cambridge Scholars Pub- lishing, pp. 91–115.
Brown Weiss, E., 1989, In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Com- mon Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity, New York, Transnational Publishers.
Brown Weiss, E., The Theoretical Framework for International Legal Principles of Intergenerational Equity and Implementation through National Institutions, in: Cordonier Segger, M. C., Szabó, M., Harrington, A., (eds.), 2021, Intergen- erational Justice in Sustainable Development Treaty Implementation: Advancing Future Generations Rights through National Institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 16–44.
Campbell, T., Kolk, M., Mosquera, J., 2023, Universal Procreation Rights and Fu- ture Generations, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 3–22.
Campos, A. S., 2019, The Rights of Future Persons under Attack: Correlativity in the Non-Identity Problem, Philosophia, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 625–648.
Cho, H., Pedersen, O., Environmental Rights and Future Generations, in: Tush- net, M., Fleiner, T., Saunders, C., (eds.), 2013, Routledge Handbook of Constitu- tional Law, Oxfordshire, Routledge, pp. 401–412.
Coomans, F., 2020, The Precautionary Principle and Its Relevance for the Protec- tion of the Human Rights of Future Generations, Maastricht Faculty of Law Work- ing Paper.
Coomans, F., 2023, Towards 2122 and Beyond: Developing the Human Rights of Future Generations, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 53–60.
Cooper, E., Bird, K., 2012, Inheritance: A Gendered and Intergenerational Di-
mension of Poverty, Development Policy Review, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 527–541.
Cordonier Segger, M. C., Szabó, M., Harrington, A. R., (eds.), 2021, Intergen- erational Justice in Sustainable Development Treaty Implementation: Advancing Future Generations Rights through National Institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Daly, A., 2023, Intergenerational Rights Are Children’s Rights: Upholding the Right to a Healthy Environment through the UNCRC, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 132–154.
Daly, P., Administrative Law: Characteristics, Legitimacy, Unity, in: Elliott, M., Varuhas, J., Stark, S., (eds.), 2018, The Unity of Public Law? Doctrinal, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives, Oxford, Hart Publishing, pp. 101–121.
Duque, M., McKnight, A., Understanding the Relationship between Inequalities and Poverty: A Review of Dynamic Mechanisms, in: Bucelli, I., McKnight, S., Summers, K., 2020, Understanding the Relationship between Inequalities and Pov- erty: Policy Toolkit, London, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LIPpaper 7.
Düwell, M., Bos, G., Steenbergen, N. van, (eds.), 2018, Towards the Ethics of a Green Future, London, Routledge.
Düwell, M., Bos, G., Why ‘Rights’ of Future People?, in: Düwell, M., Bos, G., Steenbergen, N. van, (eds.), 2018, Towards the Ethics of a Green Future, London, Routledge, pp. 9–27.
Dworkin, R., 1978, Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Elliot, R., 1989, The Rights of Future People, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 159–169.
Fairhurst, K., 2022, Our Obligations to Future Generations: A Human Rights Approach in the Case of Neubauer et al. v Germany, LLM thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Gatmaytan, D. B., 2003, The Illusion of Intergenerational Equity: Oposa v. Facto- ran as Pyrrhic Victory, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 457–486.
Ginsburg, T., The Global Spread of Constitutional Review, in: Whittington, K., Keleman, D., (eds.), 2008, Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Ginsburg, T., Versteeg, M., Models of Constitutional Review, in: Epstein, L., Grendstad, G., Šadl, U., Weinshall, K., (eds.), 2023, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behaviour, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Gonzalez, R., Rey, F., 2019, Enfranchising the Future: Climate Justice and the Representation of Future Generations, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 10, No. 5, p. e598.
Gosseries, A., 2008a, Constitutions and Future Generations, The Good Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 32–37.
Gosseries, A., 2008b, On Future Generations’ Future Rights, The Journal of Politi- cal Philosophy, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 446–474.
Gosseries, A., 2008c, Theories of Intergenerational Justice: A Synopsis, Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 39–49.
Griffith, J. A. G., 1979, The Political Constitution, Modern Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 1–21.
Hannum, H., 2019, Rescuing Human Rights: A Radically Moderate Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Herstein, O. J., 2009, The Identity and (Legal) Rights of Future Generations, George Washington Law Review, No. 77, p. 1173.
Hiskes, R., 2008, The Human Right to a Green Future: Environmental Rights and Intergenerational Justice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Humphreys, S., 2023, Taking Future Generations Seriously: A Rejoinder to Mar- garetha Wewerinke-Singh, Ayan Garg and Shubhangi Agarwalla, and Peter Law- rence, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 683–696.
Keij, D., Meurs, B. R. van, 2023, Responsibility for Future Climate Justice: The Direct Responsibility to Mitigate Structural Injustice for Future Generations, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 642–657.
Knudsen, M., Ahlqvist, T., Taylor, A., 2023, Defining “future generations”: Epis- temic considerations on conceptualizing a future-oriented domain in policy and law-making, Journal of Futures Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 3–19.
Könczöl, M., 2023, Rights and Future Persons: The Promise of Arguments from Present People’s Identity, Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 29–40.
Krämer, L., Time to Think: Sustainable Development, Future Generations and the Individual, in: Cordonier Segger, M. C., Szabó, M., Harrington, A., (eds.), 2021, Intergenerational Justice in Sustainable Development Treaty Implementation: Advancing Future Generations Rights through National Institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–224.
Lawrence, P., 2023, International Law Must Respond to the Reality of Future Generations: A Reply to Stephen Humphreys, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 669–682.
Lewis, B., 2018, The Rights of Future Generations within the Post-Paris Climate Regime, Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 69–87.
Lewis, B., Human Rights as a Basis for Institutions for Future Generations, in: Linehan, J., Lawrence, P., (eds.), 2021, Giving Future Generations a Voice, Chelten- ham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lewis, B., Protecting Environmental Human Rights for Future Generations, in: Baber, W. F., May, J., (eds.), 2023, Environmental Human Rights in the Anthro- pocene: Concepts, Contexts, and Challenges, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–51.
Linehan, L., Lawrence, P., (eds.), 2021, Giving Future Generations a Voice: Norma- tive Frameworks, Institutions, and Practice, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Martínez, E., Winter, C., 2022, Cross-Cultural Perceptions of Rights for Future Generations, LPP Working Paper, No. 6.
Mayer, B., Asselt, H. van, 2023, The Rise of International Climate Litigation, Re- view of European Community & International Environmental Law, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 175–184.
Möller, K., 2012, The Global Model of Constitutional Rights, Oxford, Oxford Uni- versity Press.
Moonen, T., Lavrysen, L., 2021, Abstract but Concrete, or Concrete but Abstract? A Guide to the Nature of Advisory Opinions under Protocol No 16 to the ECHR, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 752–785.
Netto, L., 2021, Criteria to Scrutinize New Rights: Protecting Rights against Ar- tificial Proliferation, Journal of Constitutional Research, Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 11–75.
Netto, L., The struggle is now: why we should be cautious about granting pres- ent rights to future generations, in: Izyumenko, E., (ed.), 2025b, Verfassungsbooks, Berlin, Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH, pp. 47–60.
Neves, M., 2004, La fuerza simbólica de los derechos humanos, Doxa, No. 27, pp. 143–180.
Neves, M., 2022, Symbolic Constitutionalization, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Nolan, A., 2023, Human Rights and the Cost-of-Living Crisis, Netherlands Quar-
terly of Human Rights, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 3–12.
Nolan, A., 2024, Children and Future Generations Rights before the Courts: The Vexed Question of Definitions, Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 522–546.
Nolan, A., Skelton, A., 2022, Turning the Rights Lens Inwards: The Case for Child Rights-Consistent Strategic Litigation Practice, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, p. ngac026.
Palombella, G., 2006, From Human Rights to Fundamental Rights: Consequences of a Conceptual Distinction, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 396–426.
Pedersen, O. W., Sulyok, K., 2024, Future generations litigation and transform- ative changes in environmental governance, Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 464–474.
Petel, M., 2024, The Illusion of Harmony: Power, Politics, and Distributive Impli- cations of Rights of Nature, Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 12–34.
Quising, J., 2025, Beyond Oposa: Courts reinforcing intergenerational equity as customary international law, European Law Journal, Vol. 29, Nos. 3–6, pp. 422–444.
Sadurski, W., 2014, Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Post- communist States of Central and Eastern Europe, 2nd ed., Cham, Springer.
Shue, H., 1993, Subsistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions, Law & Policy, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 39–60.
Sólyom, L., 2002, The Rights of Future Generations, and Representing Them in the Present, Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 43, Nos. 1–2, pp. 135–143.
Sulyok, K., 2023, A Rule of Law Revolution in Future Generations’ Litigation – Intergenerational Equity and the Rule of Law in the Anthropocene, re:constitu- tion, Working Paper, Vol. 14.
Sulyok, K., 2024a, Protecting the Interests of Future Generations by the European Union: An Overview of the Existing Powers and Legal Bases in EU Law, Brussels, Jesuit European Social Centre.
Sulyok, K., 2024b, Transforming the Rule of Law in Environmental and Climate Litigation: Prohibiting the Arbitrary Treatment of Future Generations, Transna- tional Environmental Law, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 475–501.
Szabó, M., Intergenerational Justice under International Treaty Law: The Obli- gations of the State to Future Generations and the Example of the Hungarian Ombudsman for Future Generations, in: Cordonier Segger, M. C., Szabó, M., Harrington, A., (eds.), 2021, Intergenerational Justice in Sustainable Development Treaty Implementation: Advancing Future Generations Rights through National In- stitutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–98.
Tasioulas, J., 2010, Taking Rights out of Human Rights, Ethics, Vol. 120, No. 4, pp. 647–678.
Tasioulas, J., 2019, Are Human Rights Taking Over the Space Once Occu- pied by Politics?, The New Statesman, 26 August, (updated 08 Sep 2021), (https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2019/08/are-human-rights-taking- over-the-space-once-occupied-by-politics-2, 15. 1. 2026).
Tasioulas, J., Verdirame, G., 2022, Philosophy of International Law, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/international-law, 18. 4. 2026).
Taylor, P., The Imperative of Responsibility in a Legal Context: Reconciling Re- sponsibilities and Rights, in: Engel, J. R., Westra, L., Bosselmann, K., (eds.), 2010, Democracy, Ecological Integrity and International Law, Cambridge, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 198–225.
Tremmel, J. C., The Four-Branches Model of Government: Representing Future Generations, in: Cordonier Segger, M. C., Szabó, M., Harrington, A., (eds.), 2021, Intergenerational Justice in Sustainable Development Treaty Implementation: Ad- vancing Future Generations Rights through National Institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 754–780.
Unruh, C., 2016, Present Rights for Future Generations, Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 77–92.
Wewerinke-Singh, M., Garg, A., Agarwalla, S., 2023, In Defence of Future Gen- erations: A Reply to Stephen Humphreys, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 651–668.
Wright, R. G., 1990, The Interests of Posterity in the Constitutional Scheme, Uni- versity of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 59, pp. 113–146.
Legislative Sources
ICJ, Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change (Request for Advisory Opinion), Oral Proceedings of 2 December 2024, Statement of Cynthia Rosah Bareagihaka Houniuhi, ICJ Verbatim Record, Doc. No. 187-20241202-ORA-01- 00-BI, p. 115.
ICJ, Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change, Advisory Opinion of 23 July 2025, I.C.J. Reports 2025.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), The Maastricht Principles on The Human Rights of Future Generations (3 February 2023).
President of the United Nations General Assembly, REV3 of the Declaration on Future Generations (23 September 2024).
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 26 (2023) on Children’s Rights and the Environment with a Special Focus on Climate Change, UN doc. CRC/C/GC/26 (22 August 2023).
United Nations System High-Level Committee on Programmes (HLCP), Core Group on Duties to the Future, Discussion paper: Duties to the future through an intergenerational equity lens, Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) (13 February 2023).
Case Law
District Court of The Hague (Rechtbank Den Haag), Stichting Greenpeace Neder- land and Eight Residents of Bonaire v. the State of the Netherlands, ECLI:NL:RB- DHA:2026:1347, Judgment of 28 January 2026.
Federal Constitutional Court of Germany (Bundesverfassungsgericht – BVerfG), Neubauer et al. v. Germany, 1 BvR 2656/18, Judgment of 24 March 2021.
ECtHR, Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, No. 53600/20, Judgment of 9 April 2024 [GC].
Supreme Court of the Netherlands, The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007, Judgment of 20 December 2019.
Supreme Court of the Philippines, Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, Judgment of 30 July 1993.
Internet Sources
Netto, L., 2024, Resisting the allure of future generations’ rights: the ECtHR’s approach to climate action in KlimaSeniorinnen, Völkerrechtsblog, 19 April, (https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/resisting-the-allure-of-future-generations-rights, 18. 4. 2026).
Netto, L., 2025, Rights beyond the Constitution: Evolution and Symbolism be- tween Text, Function and Content, (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?ab- stract_id=6176983, 18. 4. 2026).
Netto, L., 2026, The Struggle is Now: Climate Urgency in the Bonaire Judgment, I-CONnect, 19 February, (https://www.iconnectblog.com/the-struggle-is-now-cli- mate-urgency-in-the-bonaire-judgment, 18. 4. 2026).
Nolan, A., 2021, Is sustainable development bad news for children’s rights?: A provocation paper, Medium, 16 March, (https://medium.com/reframing-child- hood-past-and-present/is-sustainable-development-bad-news-for-childrens- rights-13b78e3b30ce, 18. 4. 2026).
Nolan, A., 2022, The Children Are the Future – Or Not? Exploring the Complex- ities of the Relationship between the Rights of Children and Future Generations, EJIL:Talk!, 26 May, (https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-children-are-the-future-or-not- exploring-the-complexities-of-the-relationship-between-the-rights-of-children- and-future-generations, 18. 4. 2026).