Odnos temeljnih i mračnih crta ličnosti s prosocijalnim tendencijama: Ispitivanje rodnih razlika
Sažetak
Prosocijalno ponašanje se odnosi na širok spektar akcija usmjerenih na postizanje koristi za druge prije nego na postizanje vlastite koristi, formirajući različite tipove prosocijalnih tendencija, koje su povezane s različitim individualnim karakteristikama. Također, postoje spolne razlike u tipovima prosocijalnog ponašanja u koje se žene i muškarci upuštaju. Stoga je cilj ovog istraživanja bio ispitati osobine ličnosti povezane s različitim oblicima prosocijalnih tendencija, te rodne razlike u ovim odnosima. Podaci su prikupljeni on-line na ukupno 905 sudionika (81% ženskog spola; Mdob = 24.30, SD = 6.52) putem Mjere prosocijalnih tendencija (Prosocial Tendencies Measure; koja obuhvaća 6 tipova prosocijalnih tendencija: altruistične, poslušne, emocionalne, hitne, javne i anonimne), Deset-čestičnog inventara ličnosti (Ten Item Personality Invenotry) i Kratkog upitnika Mračne trijade (Short Dark Triad). Rezultati hijerarhijske regresijske analize (s temeljnim crtama ličnosti u prvom koraku, te mračnim crtama u drugom) su pokazale da su, iako je postotak objašnjene varijance u svim tipovima prosocijalnih tendencija bio skroman (do ukupno 24%), temeljne crte ličnosti više doprinijele objašnjenju javnih prosocijalnih tendencija kod muškaraca nego kod žena. Mračne crte su imale (negativan) doprinos objašnjenju altruističnih prosocijalnih tendencija i kod muškaraca i kod žena, te doprinos objašnjenju emocionalnih, hitnih i poslušnih prosocijalnih tendencija iznad temeljnih crta ličnosti samo kod žena. Općenito, rezultati su pokazali zanimljive obrasce, naglašavajući spolne razlike u odnosu crta ličnosti i prosocijalnih tendencija.
Reference
Algina, J., Keselman, H.J., & Penfield, R.D. (2007). Confidence Intervals for an Effect Size Measure in Multiple Linear Regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(2), 207-218. doi:10.1177/0013164406292030
Algina, J., Keselman, H.J., & Penfield, R.J. (2008). Note on a Confidence Interval for the Squared Semipartial Correlation Coefficient. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(5), 734-741. doi:10.1177/0013164407313371
Batson, C.D. (2011). Altruism in Humans. Oxford University Press (OUP). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341065.001.0001
Batson, C.D., & Powell, A.A. (2003). Altruism and Prosocial Behavior. In T. Millon& M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology. Personality and Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. Vol. 5. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0519
Bereczkei, T., Birkas, B., & Kerekes, Z. (2010). The Presence of Others, Prosocial Traits, Machiavellianism. Social Psychology, 41(4), 238-245. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000032
Böckler, A., Tusche, A., & Singer, T. (2016). The structure of human prosociality: Differentiating altruistically motivated, norm motivated, strategically motivated, and self-reported prosocial behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 530-541. doi:10.1177/1948550616639650
Carlo, G., & Randall, B.A. (2002). The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31-44. doi:10.1023/a:1014033032440
Eagly, A.H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644-658. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.64.8.644
Eberly-Lewis, M.B., & Coetzee, T.M. (2015). Dimensionality in adolescent prosocial tendencies: Individual differences in serving others versus serving the self. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.032
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R.A., & Spinrad, T.L. (2007). Prosocial Development. In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0311
Espinosa, M.P., & Kovářík, J. (2015). Prosocial behavior and gender. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00088
Frieze, I.H., & Li, M.Y. (2010). Gender, Aggression, and Prosocial Behavior. In J.C. Chrisler& D.R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. (pp. 311-335). New York, NY: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_13
Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., & Swann, W.B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1
Schroeder, D.A., Graziano, W.G., Graziano, W.G., & Habashi, M.M. (2015). Searching for the Prosocial Personality. In D.A. Schroeder & W.G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior. (pp. 231-255). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (OUP). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.017
Jonason, P.K., Li, N.P., Webster, G.D., & Schmitt, D.P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 5-18. doi:10.1002/per.698
Jones, D.N., & Paulhus, D.L. (2012). Differentiating the Dark Triad Within the Interpersonal Circumplex. In L.M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions. (pp. 249-267). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118001868.ch15
Jones, D.N., & Paulhus, D.L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28-41. doi:10.1177/1073191113514105
Jones, D.N., & Weiser, D.A. (2014). Differential infidelity patterns among the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 20-24. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.007
Kauten, R., & Barry, C.T. (2014). Do you think I’m as kind as I do? The relation of adolescent narcissism with self- and peer-perceptions of prosocial and aggressive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 61-62, 69-73. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.014
Kauten, R.L., & Barry, C.T. (2016). Adolescent narcissism and its association with different indices of prosocial behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 36-45. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.11.004
Konrath, S., Ho, M., & Zarins, S. (2016). The Strategic Helper: Narcissism and Prosocial Motives and Behaviors. Current Psychology, 35(2), 182-194. doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9417-3
Lannin, D.G., Guyll, M., Krizan, Z., Madon, S., & Cornish, M. (2014). When are grandiose and vulnerable narcissists least helpful. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 127-132. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.035
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the Dark Triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183-204. doi:10.1177/1745691616666070
Paulhus, D.L., & Williams, K.M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6
Rauthmann, J.F., & Kolar, G.P. (2012). How "dark", are the Dark Triad traits?, Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 884-889. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.020
Rodrigues, J., Ulrich, N., Mussel, P., Carlo, G., & Hewig, J. (2017). Measuring prosocial tendencies in Germany: Sources of validity and reliability of the revised prosocial tendency measure. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2119-2125. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02119
Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J.F. (2001). On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals. The American Statistician, 55(3), 182-186. doi:10.1198/000313001317097960
White, B.A. (2014). Who cares when nobody is watching? Psychopathic traits and empathy in prosocial behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 116-121. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.033
Wertag, A., Vrselja, I., & Tomić, T. (2011). Assessing Construct Validity of Paulhus's and Williams's (2002) Dark Triad Questionnaire D3-27 / Provjera konstruktne valjanosti Paulhusovog i Williamsovog (2002) upitnika Mračne trijade D3-27. In: 19th Annual Conference of Croatian Psychologists. Osijek, Croatia.
Wiggins, J.S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395-412. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.3.395
Zuo, S., Wang, F., Xu, Y., Wang, F., & Zhao, X. (2016). The fragile but bright facet in the Dark Gem: Narcissism positively predicts personal morality when individual's self-esteem is at low level. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 272-276. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.076
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava nad objavljenim člancima, a izdavaču daju neekskluzivno pravo da članak objavi, da u slučaju daljeg korišćenja članka bude naveden kao njegov prvi izdavač, kao i da distribuira članak u svim oblicima i medijima. Objavljeni članci distribuiraju se u skladu sa licencom Creative Commons Autorstvo – Deliti pod istim uslovima 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) . Dopušteno je da se delo kopira i distribuira u svim medijima i formatima, da se prerađuje, menja i nadograđuje u bilo koje svrhe, uključujući i komercijalne, pod uslovom da se na pravilan način citiraju njegovi prvobitni autori, postavi link ka originalnoj licenci, naznači da li je delo izmenjeno i da se novo delo objavi pod istom licencom kao i
originalno. Autorima je dozvoljeno da objavljenu verziju rada deponuju u institucionalni ili tematski repozitorijum ili da je objave na ličnim veb stranicama (uključujući i profile na društvenim mrežama, kao što su ResearchGate, Academia.edu, itd.), na sajtu institucije u kojoj su zaposleni, u bilo koje vreme nakon objavljivanja u časopisu, uz adekvatno referisanje.