The relations of basic and dark personality traits with prosocial tendencies: Exploring gender differences
Abstract
Prosocial behavior covers a broad range of actions that are intended to benefit others rather than oneself, forming different types of prosocial tendencies which are linked to different individual characteristics. Moreover, there are some gender differences in types of prosocial behavior that males and females engage in. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate personality traits associated with different forms of prosocial tendencies, and whether there are gender differences in these relations. Data were collected on-line on a total of 905 participants (81% female; Mage = 24.30, SD = 6.52) using Prosocial Tendencies Measure (assessing 6 types of prosocial tendencies: altruistic, compliant, emotional, dire, public, and anonymous), Ten Item Personality Inventory, and Short Dark Triad. Results of hierarchical regression analyses (with the basic personality traits entered in the first and the dark personality traits in the second step) indicated that, although the percentage of explained variance in all types of prosocial tendencies was modest (up to total of 24%), the basic personality traits contributed more to explanation of public prosocial tendencies in males than in females. The dark traits had a (negative) contribution to explanation of altruistic prosocial tendencies in both males and females, and a contribution above the basic traits in explanation of emotional, dire and compliant prosocial tendencies only in females. Generally, results showed some interesting patterns, highlighting gender differences in relations of personality traits and prosocial tendencies.
References
Algina, J., Keselman, H.J., & Penfield, R.D. (2007). Confidence Intervals for an Effect Size Measure in Multiple Linear Regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(2), 207-218. doi:10.1177/0013164406292030
Algina, J., Keselman, H.J., & Penfield, R.J. (2008). Note on a Confidence Interval for the Squared Semipartial Correlation Coefficient. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(5), 734-741. doi:10.1177/0013164407313371
Batson, C.D. (2011). Altruism in Humans. Oxford University Press (OUP). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341065.001.0001
Batson, C.D., & Powell, A.A. (2003). Altruism and Prosocial Behavior. In T. Millon& M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology. Personality and Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. Vol. 5. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0519
Bereczkei, T., Birkas, B., & Kerekes, Z. (2010). The Presence of Others, Prosocial Traits, Machiavellianism. Social Psychology, 41(4), 238-245. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000032
Böckler, A., Tusche, A., & Singer, T. (2016). The structure of human prosociality: Differentiating altruistically motivated, norm motivated, strategically motivated, and self-reported prosocial behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 530-541. doi:10.1177/1948550616639650
Carlo, G., & Randall, B.A. (2002). The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31-44. doi:10.1023/a:1014033032440
Eagly, A.H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644-658. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.64.8.644
Eberly-Lewis, M.B., & Coetzee, T.M. (2015). Dimensionality in adolescent prosocial tendencies: Individual differences in serving others versus serving the self. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.032
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R.A., & Spinrad, T.L. (2007). Prosocial Development. In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0311
Espinosa, M.P., & Kovářík, J. (2015). Prosocial behavior and gender. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00088
Frieze, I.H., & Li, M.Y. (2010). Gender, Aggression, and Prosocial Behavior. In J.C. Chrisler& D.R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. (pp. 311-335). New York, NY: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_13
Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., & Swann, W.B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1
Schroeder, D.A., Graziano, W.G., Graziano, W.G., & Habashi, M.M. (2015). Searching for the Prosocial Personality. In D.A. Schroeder & W.G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior. (pp. 231-255). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (OUP). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.017
Jonason, P.K., Li, N.P., Webster, G.D., & Schmitt, D.P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 5-18. doi:10.1002/per.698
Jones, D.N., & Paulhus, D.L. (2012). Differentiating the Dark Triad Within the Interpersonal Circumplex. In L.M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions. (pp. 249-267). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118001868.ch15
Jones, D.N., & Paulhus, D.L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28-41. doi:10.1177/1073191113514105
Jones, D.N., & Weiser, D.A. (2014). Differential infidelity patterns among the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 20-24. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.007
Kauten, R., & Barry, C.T. (2014). Do you think I’m as kind as I do? The relation of adolescent narcissism with self- and peer-perceptions of prosocial and aggressive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 61-62, 69-73. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.014
Kauten, R.L., & Barry, C.T. (2016). Adolescent narcissism and its association with different indices of prosocial behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 36-45. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.11.004
Konrath, S., Ho, M., & Zarins, S. (2016). The Strategic Helper: Narcissism and Prosocial Motives and Behaviors. Current Psychology, 35(2), 182-194. doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9417-3
Lannin, D.G., Guyll, M., Krizan, Z., Madon, S., & Cornish, M. (2014). When are grandiose and vulnerable narcissists least helpful. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 127-132. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.035
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the Dark Triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183-204. doi:10.1177/1745691616666070
Paulhus, D.L., & Williams, K.M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6
Rauthmann, J.F., & Kolar, G.P. (2012). How "dark", are the Dark Triad traits?, Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 884-889. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.020
Rodrigues, J., Ulrich, N., Mussel, P., Carlo, G., & Hewig, J. (2017). Measuring prosocial tendencies in Germany: Sources of validity and reliability of the revised prosocial tendency measure. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2119-2125. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02119
Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J.F. (2001). On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals. The American Statistician, 55(3), 182-186. doi:10.1198/000313001317097960
White, B.A. (2014). Who cares when nobody is watching? Psychopathic traits and empathy in prosocial behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 116-121. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.033
Wertag, A., Vrselja, I., & Tomić, T. (2011). Assessing Construct Validity of Paulhus's and Williams's (2002) Dark Triad Questionnaire D3-27 / Provjera konstruktne valjanosti Paulhusovog i Williamsovog (2002) upitnika Mračne trijade D3-27. In: 19th Annual Conference of Croatian Psychologists. Osijek, Croatia.
Wiggins, J.S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395-412. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.3.395
Zuo, S., Wang, F., Xu, Y., Wang, F., & Zhao, X. (2016). The fragile but bright facet in the Dark Gem: Narcissism positively predicts personal morality when individual's self-esteem is at low level. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 272-276. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.076
Authors retain the copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the nonexclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of re-use, and to distribute it in all forms and media. The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original
author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original. Authors are permitted to deposit the author’s publisher’s version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author’s personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), and/or departmental website at any time after publication, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.