Teachers’ opinions on implementing educational standards in Serbia and Croatia
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to compare the way in which the concept of educational standards and its introduction into educational policy and school practice is perceived by teachers from Serbia and teachers from Croatia. The paper also investigates teachers’ perspectives on educational standards in the Croatian and Serbian primary and secondary education and contrasts them with the understanding of standards elsewhere. A qualitative methodological approach was applied in conducting the interviews and focus groups with teachers, accompanied by a thematic analysis of the collected data. The interviews and focus groups were carried out as a part of research within two PhD theses. The sample consisted of 101 teachers, out of whom57 were primary school teachers from Serbia and 44 were secondary school teachers from Croatia. The results show that teachers from these countries have very similar perspectives on the implementation of educational standards in their respective countries. The findings are presented within three connected themes: 1) distrust in the educational administration; 2) thinking about education as a public good, and 3) standards as the ways of overcoming some shortfalls in professional identity.
References
World Bank. (2017). International Comparison Database. Avalilable at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.CD. Accessed November 2018..
Human Development Index. (2018). Available at http://www.hdr.undp.org/en/2018-update. Accessed December 2018.
Bain, O. (2010). Education after the fall of the Berlin Wall: The end of history or the beginning of histories. In I. Silova (Ed.), Post-socialism is Not Dead: (re)reading the Global in Comparative Education. Bingley: Emerad. pp. 25-57; Retrieved from https://books.google.hr/books?id=K6xT2XMWy2gC&pg=PA4&lpg=PA4&dq=post+socialism+is+not+dead+pdf+bain ….
Baird, J. (2013). The currency of assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20(2), 147-149. doi:10.1080/0969594x.2013.787782
Ball, S.J. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065
Ball, S.J. (2015). What is policy? 21 years later: reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(3), 306-313. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1015279
Barber, M. (2004). The Virtue of Accountability: System Redesign, Inspection, and Incentives in the Era of Informed Professionalism. Journal of Education, 185(1), 7-38. doi:10.1177/002205740518500102
Berry, R., & Adamson, B. (2011). Assessment Reform in Education. New York: Springer.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
Broadfoot, P. (1996). Education, Assessment and Society. Bristol: Open University Press.
Broadfoot, P. (2000). Comparative Education for the 21st Century: Retrospect and prospect. Comparative Education, 36(3), 357-371. doi:10.1080/03050060050129036
Dull, L.J. (2012). Teaching for Humanity in a Neoliberal World: Visions of Education in Serbia. Comparative Education Review, 56(3), 511-533. doi:10.1086/664993
Guest, G., MacQueen, K., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. London: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781483384436
Gunzenhauser, M.G. (2003). High-Stakes Testing and the Default Philosophy of Education. Theory Into Practice, 42(1), 51-58. doi:10.1353/tip.2003.0007
Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond education and standards. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..
Hebib, E. i Spasenović, V. (2011). Školski sistem Srbije i pravci razvoja. Pedagogija, 66 (3), 373-383.
Hursh, D. (2005). Neo-Liberalism, Markets and Accountability: Transforming Education and Undermining Democracy in the United States and England. Policy Futures in Education, 3(1), 3-15. doi:10.2304/pfie.2005.3.1.6
Ivić, I. (1996). A draft of a necessary curriculum theory. In G. Zindović-Vukadinović & S. Krnjajić (Eds.), Towards a modern learner - centered curriculum. Belgrade: Institute for Educational Research - UNESCO - UNICEEF.
Klieme, E., Avenarius, H., Blum, W., Döbrich, P., Gruber, H., Prenzel, M., . . . Vollmer, H. (2003). The development of national educational standards. An expertise. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung/Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Publications and Website Division D-11055.
Kovač, C.T., & Levkov, L.J. (2002). Kvalitetno obrazovanje za sve, Put ka razvijenom društvu / Quality Education for All, Way Toward a Developed Society. Beograd: Ministarstvo prosvete I sporta Republike Srbije. [ [Kovács-Cerović, Tünde and Levkov, Ljiljana (Eds); Belgrade: Ministry of Education and Sports Republic of Serbia.].
Lim, C.P. (2007). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: Pedagogical and policy implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(1), 83-116. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9025-2
Minina, E. (2014). “Why Doesn’t the Telephone Ring? Reform of Educational Standards in Russia” Still an Issue? Approaching and Challenging Post-Socialist and Post-authoritarian Education: Difficulties, Routines and Innovations of Empirical Research. Inter Disciplines: Journal of History and Sociology, 5 (2); 1-44.
Maksimović, A. (2016). Teachers' views of student achievement standards / Standardi postignuća učenika iz perspektive nastavnika. Nastava i vaspitanje, 65(2), 279-296. doi:10.5937/nasvas1602279m
Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..
MoSES. (2005). Education Sector Development Plan 2005-2010. Zagreb. Retrieved from https://mzo.hr/sites/default/files/migrated/education-sector-development-plan-2005-2010.pdf.
Oliver-Hoyo, M., & Allen, D. (2006). The Use of Triangulation Methods in Qualitative Educational Research. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35 (4); 42-47.
Ministarstvo prosvete i sporta. (2003). Opšte osnove školskog programa / The national core curriculum for general education. Beograd.
Ministarstvo prosvete Republike Srbije, , & -Zavod za vrednovanje kvaliteta obrazovanja I vaspitanja, (2009). Obrazovni standardi za kraj obaveznog obrazovanja / Educational standards for the end of compulsory education. Beograd.
Ministarstvo prosvete Republike Srbije, , & -Zavod za vrednovanje kvaliteta obrazovanja I vaspitanja, (2011). Opšti standardi postignuća – obrazovni standardi za kraj prvog ciklusa obrazovanja / General Standards of Achievement for the first cycle of education. Beograd.
Pravilnik o opštim standardima postignuća za kraj opšteg srednjeg obrazovanja i srednjeg stručnog obrazovanja u delu opšteobrazovnih predmeta / The Rulebook on ….
Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije / Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, (2013). br. 117 / no. 117.
Radišić, J., Raković, J., Pantić, N., Marković, J., Maksimović, A., & Marković, M. (2012). Teachers as proponents and opponents of education reforms - the case of Serbia. In J. Madalinska-Michalak, H. Niemi, & S. Chong (Eds.), Research, Policy and Practice in Teacher Education in Europe. Lodz: University of Lodz. 223-241.
Rado, P. (2010). Governing Decentralized Education Systems: Systemic Change in South Eastern Europe. Budapest: Open Society Foundations.
Radunović, D. (2007). Predlog obrazovnih standarda na kraju obaveznog obrazovanja u Srbiji / Proposal of educational standards at the end of compulsory education in Serbia. In Z. Grac (Ed.), Istraživanje obrazovanja i formulisanje obrazovnih politika. Beograd: Centar ѕa obrazovne politike / Research on Education and Formulation of Educational Policies. Beograd: Centar ѕa obrazovne politike. [Belgrade: Centre for Education Policy].
Reay, D. (2012). “We never get a fair chance”: Working class experiences of education in the twenty-first century. In W. Atkinson, S. Roberts, & M. Savage (Eds.), Class Inequality and Austerity in Britain: Power, Difference and Suffering. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. (pp. 33–50). Doi:10.1057/9781137016386.0006.
Rizvi, , & Lingard, (2010). Globalizing education policy. Oxon: Routledge.
Robertson, S.L. (2012). Teachers’ work, denationalisation, and transformations in the field of symbolic control: A comparative account. University of Bristol - Centre for Globalisation, Education and Societies. Retrieved from http://susanleerobertson.com/publications.
Sharma, P. (2015). Standards-based Assessments in the Classroom: A Feasible Approach to Improving the Quality of Students’ Learning. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 12(1), 6-30. doi:10.1177/0973184914556864
Silova, I., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2008). How NGOs React. In I. Silova & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), How NGOs react. Bloomfield: Kumarian. pp. 1-41.
Silova, I., & Brehm, W.C. (2013). The Shifting Boundaries of Teacher Professionalism. In T. Seddon & J.S. Levin (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education. Oxon: Routledge. (pp. 55-74).
Silova, I., & Eklof, B. (2013). Education in Eastern and Central Europe: Re-Thinking Post-Socialism in the Context of Globalisation. In R.F. Arnove & C.A. Torres (Eds.), Comparative Education: The Dialectic between the global and the local. New York: Rowman and Littlefield. pp. 379-402; 4th ed..
Smith, L.A., Anderson, V., & Blanch, K. (2016). Five beginning teachers' reflections on enacting New Zealand's national standards. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 107-116. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.014
Sobe, N.W. (2006). U.S. Comparative Education Research on Yugoslav Education in the 1950s and 1960s. European Education, 38(4), 44-64. doi:10.2753/eue1056-4934380403
Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Informa UK Limited. doi:10.4324/9780203930502
Spady, W. (1998). Paradigm lost: Reclaiming America's educational future. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
Stanković, D. (2011). Obrazovne promene u Srbiji (2000-2010) / Educational Changes in Serbia (2000-2010). In M. Vujačić, J. Pavlović, D. Stanković, V. Džinović, & I. Đerić (Eds.), Predstave o obrazovnim promenama u Srbiji. Refleksije o prošlosti, vizije budućnosti / Educational Changes in Serbia. Reflections on the past, the vision of the future. Belgrade: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja / Institute for Pedagogical Research. (pp. 41—62).
Steiner-Khamsi, G., & ed., (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. Teachers College Press.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012). Understanding policy borrowing and lending. In: G. Steiner Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education 2012. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203137628
Steiner-Khamsi, G., Silova, I., & Johnson, E.M. (2006). Neoliberalism liberally applied Educational policy borrowing in Central Asia. In J. Ozga, T. Seddon, & T.S. Popkewitz (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education Education Research and Policy: Steering the Knowledge-based Economy. Oxon: Routledge. (pp. 217-245). 2006.
Steiner-Khamsi, G., Stolpe, I., Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Stolpe, I. (2006). Educational Import in Mongolia: A Historical Perspective. In Educational Import. (pp. 23-49). New York: Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1057/9781403982971_2
Volante, L., & Earl, L. (2015). Standards, accountability, and student assessment systems. Education Canada, 55(2). Retrieved from http://www. cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/standards-accountability-and-studentassessment- systems.
Wyatt-Smith, C., & Cumming, J. (2009). Educational Assessment in the 21st Century. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J.J. Cumming (Eds.), . Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9
Authors retain the copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the nonexclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of re-use, and to distribute it in all forms and media. The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original
author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original. Authors are permitted to deposit the author’s publisher’s version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author’s personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), and/or departmental website at any time after publication, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.