The relationship between religious attitudes and attachment in late adolescence
Abstract
The purpose of this study, based on the findings that there is a link between the attachment system and the different aspects of religiosity, is to examine the degree of expression of four religious attitudes – literal belief, post-critical belief, relativism, and external critique, as well as their potential relationships with different qualities of parental attachment in late adolescence. The sample is represented by 301 respondents – 176 girls and 125 boys, average age 19.2 years, who completed the Post-Critical Belief Scale and the modified version of the Experiences in Close Relationships Inventory. The results indicate that adolescents have the highest tendency towards post-critical belief and the least tendency towards external criticism, where girls are on average more likely to have a literal and post-critical belief, while boys are more inclined to relativism and external critique. Furthermore, the results showed that among adolescents expressing different types of attachment there are significant differences in leaning towards literal and post-critical belief, external critique, but not relativism, i.e. it was found that higher anxiety and lower avoidance predict a greater tendency towards literal and post-critical belief, whereas a higher avoidance predict a stronger tendency towards external critique, but with the low percentage of explained variance. The results were interpreted based on the context of the findings of previous researches and were perceived in the light of current models that explain the relationship between the quality of attachment and religion.
References
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2009). The first 10,000 Adult Attachment Interviews: distributions of adult attachment representations in clinical and non-clinical groups. Attachment & Human Development, 11(3), 223–263. doi:10.1080/14616730902814762
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Selfreport measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Del Giudice, M. (2019). Sex differences in attachment styles. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.004
Duriez, B., Fontaine, J., & Hutsebaut, D. (2000). A further elaboration of the Post-Critical Belief scale: Evidence for the existence of four different approaches to religion in Flanders-Belgium. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 153–181.
Dušanić, S. (2007). Psihološka istraživanja religioznosti. Banjaluka: Filozofski fakultet.
Dušanić, S., Lakić, S., i Turjačanin, V. (2018). Socijalne identifikacije mladih u relaciji sa porodičnom afektivnom vezanošću i roditeljskim ponašanjima. Psihološka istraživanja, 21(1), 91−110.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), A second course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed., pp. 439−492). Charlotte: Information Age.
Fraley, R. C., Hudson, N. W., Heffernan, M. E., & Segal, N. (2015). Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(2), 354−368. doi:10.1037/pspp0000027
Granqvist, P., & Hagekull, B. (1999). Religiousness and perceived childhood attachment: Profiling socialized correspondence and emotional compensation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(2), 254−273. doi:10.2307/1387793
Granqvist, P. (2002). Attachment and religion: An integrative developmental framework. Upssala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Hadžić Krnetić, A. (2009). Afektivna vezanost i doživljaj boga. U D. Branković (ur.), Zbornik radova sa naučnog skupa Banjalučki novembarski susreti: Naučna i duhovna utemeljenost društvenih reformi (str. 269−293). Banja Luka: Filozofski fakultet.
Hadžić Krnetić, A. (2010). Razumijevanje religijskih pojmova – razvojni pristup. Radovi: časopis za humanističke i društvene nauke, 287−331.
Hadžić Krnetić, A. (2012). Bog kao figura afektivne vezanosti – konstruisanje instrumenta. U B. Dimitrijević (ur.), Psihički razvoj, mentalno zdravlje i rad (str. 160−175). Niš: Filozofski fakultet.
Hoffmann, J. P. (2019). Risk preference theory and gender differences in religiousness: A replication and extension. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 58(1), 210−230. doi:10.1111/jssr.12578
Hutsebaut, D. (1996). Post-Critical Belief a new approach to the religious attitude problem. Journal of Empirical Theology, 9, 48−66. doi:10.1163/157092596X00132
Kamenov, Ž., i Jelić, M. (2003). Validacija instrumenta za mjerenje privrženosti u različitim vrstama bliskih odnosa: Modifikacija Brennanova Inventara iskustava u bliskim vezama. Suvremena psihologija, 6(1), 73−91.
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Shaver, P. R. (1990). Attachment Theory and religion: Childhood attachments, religious beliefs, and conversion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(3), 315−334. doi:10.2307/1386461
Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1992). An attachment-theory approach to the psychology of religion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(1), 3−28. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0201_2
McMorris, J., & Glass, J. (2018). Contemporary approaches to gender and religion. In B. J. Risman, C. M. Froyum, & W. J. Scarborough (Eds.), Handbooks of the Sociology of Gender (pp. 433–447). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_31
Pollefeyt, D., & Bouwens, J. (2014). Identity in dialogue: Assessing and enhancing Catholic school Identity research methodology and research results in Catholic schools in Victoria, Australia. Zweigniederlassung Zurich: Lit Verlag GmbH and Co.
Stark, R. (2002). Physiology and faith: Addressing the „universal” gender difference in religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(3), 495–507. doi:10.1111/1468-5906.00133
Stefanović Stanojević, T. (2011). Afektivna vezanost: razvoj, modaliteti i procena. Niš: Filozofski fakultet.
Stefanović Stanojević, T., i Hadžić Krnetić, A. (2014). Affective attachment and religiosity. Teme: časopis za društvene nauke, 38(3), 1175−1196.
Taber, K. S. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Wulff, D. M. (1991). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary views. New York: Wiley.
Authors retain the copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the nonexclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of re-use, and to distribute it in all forms and media. The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original
author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original. Authors are permitted to deposit the author’s publisher’s version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author’s personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), and/or departmental website at any time after publication, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.