Big Five traits as (mal)adaptive behavioral responses to harsh and unpredictable environment: further evidence for the state-dependent evolution of personality

  • Janko M Međedović Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd Fakultet za medije i komunikacije, Beograd
Keywords: state-dependent behavior, Big Five personality traits, environment, fitness, human behavioral ecology

Abstract


State-dependent behavior models of personality predict that the fitness consequences of personality are dependent on various states; hence, personality traits may be adaptive only in certain conditions. In the present research we tested the state-dependent personality model of Big Five personality traits using harsh and unpredictable environments as the extrinsic states. The data is collected in a community sample (N=221). We extracted the fitness factor from a broader set of indicators related to reproduction and mating - it consisted of higher reproductive success, longest romantic relationship duration, and earlier age of first reproduction. The only personality trait which significantly predicted fitness was low Openness to experience. However, three interactions between environmental conditions and personality in the prediction of fitness were detected: Low Agreeableness and Extraversion decreased fitness in highly unstable environments; low Openness elevated fitness, especially in harsh environments. The data are in accordance with the previous findings regarding the relations between personality and evolutionary fitness. Furthermore, current findings suggest the that state-dependent models of personality are not only valid explanations of evolutionary forces which maintain personality variation, but that they are quite robust as well, since they can be detected in a relatively small sample of reproductively active individuals.

References

Alvergne, A., Jokela, M., & Lummaa, V. (2010). Personality and reproductive success in a high-fertility human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 11745–11750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001752107

Bailey, D. H., Walker, R. S., Blomquist, G. E., Hill, K. R., Hurtado, A. M., & Geary, D. C. (2013). Heritability and fitness correlates of personality in the Ache, a natural-fertility population in Paraguay. PLoS One, 8, e59325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0059325

Beauchamp, J. P. (2016). Genetic evidence for natural selection in humans in the contemporary United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(28), 7774-7779. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1600398113

Belsky, J., Schlomer, G. L., & Ellis, B. J. (2012). Beyond cumulative risk: distinguishing harshness and unpredictability as determinants of parenting and early life history strategy. Developmental psychology, 48(3), 662-673.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0024454

Berg, V., Lummaa, V., Lahdenperä, M., Rotkirch, A., & Jokela, M. (2014). Personality and long-term reproductive success measured by the number of grandchildren. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(6), 533-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.07.006

Berg, V., Rotkirch, A., Väisänen, H., & Jokela, M. (2013). Personality is differentially associated with planned and non-planned pregnancies. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(4), 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.010

Brumbach, B. H., Figueredo, A. J., & Ellis, B. J. (2009). Effects of harsh and unpredictable environments in adolescence on development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20(1), 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-009-9059-3

Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2009). Women's well-being: The role of individual differences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 309–315. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00711.x

Dingemanse, N. J., & Wolf, M. (2010). Recent models for adaptive personality differences: a review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365, 3947–3958. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0221

Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Stieglitz, J., Kaplan, H., & Rodriguez, D. E. (2014). The evolutionary fitness of personality traits in a small-scale subsistence society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 17–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013. 09.002

John, O.P., Naumann, L.P., & Soto, C.J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O.P. John, R.W. Robins, & L.A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford Press.

Jokela, M. (2012). Birth-cohort effects in the association between personality and fertility. Psychological Science, 23, 835–841. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797612439067

Jokela, M., Alvergne, A., Pollet, T. V., & Lummaa, V. (2011). Reproductive behavior and personality traits of the Five Factor Model. European Journal of Personality, 25, 487–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.822

Johnson-Hanks, J. (2008). Demographic transitions and modernity. Annual review of anthropology, 37, 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085138

Knežević, G. (2003). Koreni amoralnosti [The roots of amorality]. Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Institut za psihologiju.

Međedović, J. (2018a). What can human personality psychology learn from behavioral ecology? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 132(4), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000120

Međedović, J. (2018b). Testing the state-dependent behavior models in humans: Environmental harshness moderates the link between personality and mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.035

Međedović, J. (2019). Examining the link between religiousness and fitness in a behavioural ecological framework. Journal of biosocial science, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932019000774

Međedović, J., & Kovačević, U. (2020). Personality as a state-dependent behavior: Do childhood poverty and pregnancy planning moderate the link between personality and fitness? Personality and Individual Differences, 154, 109625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109625

Međedović, J. & Petrović, B. (in press). Relationships between basic emotions and reproductive fitness are moderated by sex as an internal state. Primenjena Psihologija.

Međedović, J., Šoljaga, M., Stojković, A., & Gojević, I. (2018). Revealing complex relations between personality and fitness: HEXACO personality traits, life-time reproductive success and the age at first birth. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.014

Meisenberg, G. (2010). The reproduction of intelligence. Intelligence, 38(2), 220-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.01.003

Miller, W. B., Rodgers, J. L., & Pasta, D. J. (2010). Fertility motivations of youth predict later fertility outcomes: A prospective analysis of national longitudinal survey of youth data. Biodemography and social biology, 56(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 19485561003709131

Nettle, D., Gibson, M. A., Lawson, D. W., & Sear, R. (2013). Human behavioral ecology: current research and future prospects. Behavioral Ecology, 24(5), 1031-1040. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars222

Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(5), 1113-1135. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113

Penke, L., & Jokela, M. (2016). The evolutionary genetics of personality revisited. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.021

Reeve, C. L., Lyerly, J. E., & Peach, H. (2013). Adolescent intelligence and socio-economic wealth independently predict adult marital and reproductive behavior. Intelligence, 41(5), 358-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.05.010

Sanjak, J. S., Sidorenko, J., Robinson, M. R., Thornton, K. R., & Visscher, P. M. (2018). Evidence of directional and stabilizing selection in contemporary humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707227114

Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture: Disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(1), 212-221. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.212

Sheppard, P., Pearce, M. S., & Sear, R. (2016). How does childhood socioeconomic hardship affect reproductive strategy? Pathways of development. American Journal of Human Biology, 28(3), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22793

Sih, A., Mathot, K. J., Moiron, M., Montiglio, P. O., Wolf, M., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2015). Animal personality and state–behaviour feedbacks: a review and guide for empiricists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(1), 50-60.

Skirbekk, V., & Blekesaune, M. (2014). Personality traits increasingly important for male fertility: Evidence from Norway. European Journal of Personality, 28(6), 521-529. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1936

Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013). The ape that thought it was a peacock: Does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24(3), 137-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2013.804899

Tropf, F. C., Stulp, G., Barban, N., Visscher, P. M., Yang, J., Snieder, H., & Mills, M. C. (2015). Human fertility, molecular genetics, and natural selection in modern societies. PLoS One, 10, e0126821. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126821

Vukasović, T., & Bratko, D. (2015). Heritability of personality: a meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 769–785. https://psycnet.apa.org/ doi/10.1037/bul0000017
Published
2020/11/19
Section
Scientific Articles