Relationship between Dishonest Academic Behaviour and Students' Attitudes towards School Offenses
Abstract
The goal of this study is to determine if there is a correlation between academic dishonesty and students' attitudes toward school offenses. The research included 347 respondents from primary (seventh and eighth grades) and secondary (second and third grades) schools in Republic of Serbia. A Measurement of Dishonest Behaviour (MDB) was used to assess several types of dishonest behaviour: Plagiarism, Deception, Cheating, Sabotage, Bribery, and Aiding Others. The School Offenses Scale (SOS), which includes subscales for Copying, Running Away from Classes, Whispering, Falsifying School Documents, Rationalising Violence against Teachers and Professors, Bribery and Corruption, Nepotism, and General Attitude toward School Offenses, was used to evaluate the prevalence of immorality in attitudes toward school offenses. According to the findings, there is a significant positive relationship between dishonest behaviour and students' attitudes regarding school offenses. The total score of students' attitudes has the highest relationship with the subscale of dishonest behaviour connected to Deception, while the total score of dishonest behaviour has the highest correlation with several subscales of immoral attitudes: Running Away from Classes, General Attitude, Nepotism, Falsification, and Bribery and Corruption. The findings of canonical correlation analysis were discussed in this paper, which focused on the relationship between sets of behavioural scales and attitudinal scales. Furthermore, relationship between immoral attitudes and dishonest behaviour were explained through theory of cognitive dissonance, while possible ways of predicting dishonest behaviours and methods of reducing cheating and other types of dishonest behaviours are presented in the conclusion.
References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ajzen, I., & Sexton, J. (1999). Depth of processing, belief congruence, and attitude-behavior correspondence. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 117-138). New York: Guilford Press.
Anderman, E. M., & Koenka, A. C. (2017). The relation between academic motivation and cheating. Theory Into Practice, 56(2), 95–102.
Aronson, E., Chase, T., Helmreich, R., & Ruhnke, R. (1974). A two-factor theory of dissonance reduction: The effect of feeling stupid or feeling awful on opinion change. International Journal for Research and Communication, 3, 59-74.
Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2005). Socijalna psihologija. Zagreb: Mate.
Baumeister, R. F. (1993). Self-esteem: The puzzle of low selfregard. New York: Plenum.
Bisping, T. O., Patron, H., & Roskelley, K. (2008). Modeling academic dishonesty: The role of student perceptions and misconduct type. The Journal of Economic Education, 39(1), 4–21.
Björklund, M., & Wenestam, C. G. (1999, September 22-25). Academic cheating: frequency, methods and causes [Paper presentation]. European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Lahti, Finland.
Bouffard, T., Vezeau, C., & Trudel, L. (2008). Explaining students' misconduct: Perceptions of justice and moral disengagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(6), 703-718.
Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
Cizek, G. J., & Burg, S. S. (2006). Addressing students' self-serving bias: An attributional approach to improving grading accuracy. Educational Researcher, 35(2), 3-10.
Cohen, J., McCabe, D. L., & Michelli, N. M. (2009). Understanding and preventing academic dishonesty: A handbook for teachers and administrators. John Wiley & Sons.
Day, N. E., Hudson, D., Dobies, P. R., & Waris, R. (2011). Student or situation? Personality and classroom context as predictors of attitudes about business school cheating. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 261–282.
Granvik Saminathen, M., Brolin Låftman, S., Almquist, Y. B., & Modin, B. (2018). Effective schools, school segregation, and the link with school achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1–21.
Karami, M., Rostami, M., & Abedi, M. R. (2017). Predicting academic dishonesty among high school students: The role of subjective norms, academic self-concept, and perceived behavioral control. Educational Psychology, 37(6), 679-693.
Kohlberg, L. & Candee, D. (1984). The relationship of moral judgment to moral action. In W. Kurtines, & J. Gewirtz (Eds.). Morality, moral behaviorand moral development (pp. 52-73). New York: Wiley.
LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (2006). A comparison of cheating and attitudes toward cheating among business and engineering students. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 167-180.
Magnus, J. R., Polterovich, V. M., Danilov, D. L., & Savvateev, A. V. (2002). Tolerance of cheating: An analysis across countries. The Journal of Economic Education, 33(2), 125-135.
McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2012). Cheating in college: Why students do it and what educators can do about it. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Higher Education, 70(2), 211-234.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics &Behavior, 11(3), 219-232.
Mirić, J. (2001). Razvoj moralnog mišljenja. Beograd: Kalekom.
Peruničić, I., i Mirić, J. (2011). Rasprostranjenost imorala u stavovima učenika i studenata prema školskim prestupima. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja, 43(2), 283-298.
Radosavljević, V. (2014). Povezanost crte poštenja s nepoštenim akademskim ponašanjem srednjoškolaca [Master rad]. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, odeljenje za psihologiju.
Ramberg, J., & Modin, B. (2019). School effectiveness and student cheating: Do students’ grades and moral standards matter for this relationship?. Social Psychology of Education, 22(3), 517-538.
Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50(3), 293-313.
Schmelkin, L. P., Gilbert, K., Spencer, K. J., Pincus, H. S., & Silva, R. (2008). A multidimensional scaling of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 587–607.
Šimić Šašić, S., & Klarin, M. (2009). Varanje u srednjim školama u Hrvatskoj i u Bosni I Hercegovini. Društvena istraživanja, 18(6), 999-1022.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.
Teixeira, A. A., & Rocha, M. F. (2010). Cheating by economics and business undergraduate students: An exploratory international assessment. Higher Education, 59(6), 663–701.
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: morality and convencion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vesić, D., Džinović, V., & Mirkov, S. (2021). The role of absenteeism in the prediction of math achievement on the basis of self-concept and motivation: TIMMS 2015 in Serbia. Psihologija, 54(1), 15-31.
Videnović, M., & Čaprić, G. (2018). PISA 2018: Izveštaj za Republiku Srbiju. Republika Srbija: Ministarstvo prosvete, nauke i tehnološkog razvoja. http://www.obrazovanje.org/rs/uploaded/dokumenta/PISA-2018_Izvestaj-za-Republiku-Srbiju_ceo.pdf
Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235-274.
Whitley, B. E., & Keith- Spiegel, P. (2002). Academic dishonesty: An educator’s guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1998). Resistance to change: The cornerstone of cognitive dissonance theory. In E. Harmon-Jones, & J. S. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance theory: Revival with revisions and controversies (pp. 310-322). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wilson, V., Malcolm, H., Edward, S., & Davidson, J. (2008). ‘Bunking off’: the impact of truancy on pupils and teachers. British Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 1-17.
Wowra, S. A. (2007). Moral identities, social anxiety, and academic dishonesty among American college students. Ethics and Behavior, 17(3), 303–321.
Authors retain the copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the nonexclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of re-use, and to distribute it in all forms and media. The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original
author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original. Authors are permitted to deposit the author’s publisher’s version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author’s personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), and/or departmental website at any time after publication, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.