Razlike između muškaraca i žena u percepciji partnerove autentičnosti
Sažetak
Cilj istraživanja je je bio da se utvrdi da li postoji razlika u percepciji partnerove autentičnosti s obzirom na pol i starost ispitanika, dužinu braka, zadovoljstvo partnerskim odnosom i zadovoljstvo podrškom partnera. Uzorak su činila 32 bračna para (N=64), prosečne starosti 40 godina. Dužina braka ispitanika je od 4 do 33 godine. U istraživanju je korišćena Skala autentičnosti u partnerskim odnosima (Grijak, 2018). Rezultati su pokazali da starost ispitanika između 41 i 53 godine, brak dužine između 16 i 33 godina i zadovoljstvo partnerskim odnosom povećavaju mogućnost da partneri usvoje ciljeve povezanosti i međusobnog poverenja, a smanjuje mogućnost za usvajanjem ciljeva samozaštite u partnerskom odnosu. Prikazano istraživanje je značajan doprinos detaljnijem interpersonalnom ispitivanju autentičnosti u partnerskom odnosu i ciljevima partnera u odnosu.
Reference
Brunell, A.B., Kernis, M.H., Goldman, B.M., Heppner, W., Davis, P., Cascio, E.V., i Webster, G.D. (2010). Dispositional authenticity and romantic relationship functioning. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 900−905. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.018
Cole, T. (2001). Lying to the One you Love: The Use of Deception in Romantic Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(1), 107−129.doi:10.1177/0265407501181005
Cutrona, C.E., Russell, D.W., i Gardner, K.A. (2005).The Relationship Enhancement Model of Social Support.U T.A. Revenson, K. Kayser, i G. Bodenmann (Ur.), Decade of behavior. Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping.(str. 73−95). Washington: American Psychological Association (APA). doi:10.1037/11031-004
DePaulo, B.M., i Kashy, D.A. (1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 63−79. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.63
Fincham, F.D., i Bradbury, T.N. (1992).Assessing attributions in marriage: The Relationship Attribution Measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 457−468. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.62.3.457
Grégoire, S., Baron, L., Ménard, J., i Lachance, L. (2014). The Authenticity Scale: Psychometric properties of a French translation and exploration of its relationships with personality and well-being. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 46(3), 346−355.doi:10.1037/a0030962
Grijak, D. (2017). Psychometric evaluation of the authenticity scale on the sample of students in Serbia. Psihologija, 50(1), 85−99.doi:10.2298/psi160504001g
Grijak, Đ. (2018). Validacija srpske adaptacije skale autentičnosti u partnerskim odnosima - (AIRS). Primenjena psihologija, 11(1), 89−104. doi:10.19090/pp.2018.1.89-104
Hodgins, H.S., i Knee, C.R. (2002).The integrating self and conscious experience. U E.L. Deci iR.M. Ryan (Ur.), Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press. str. 87−100.
Hodgins, H.S., Weibust, K.S., Weinstein, N., Shiffman, S., Miller, A., Coombs, G., i Adair, K.C. (2010). The Cost of Self-Protection: Threat Response and Performance as a Function of Autonomous and Controlled Motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(8), 1101−1114.doi:10.1177/0146167210375618
İlhan, T., i Özdemir, Y. (2013). Adaptation of Authenticity Scale to Turkish: A validity and Reliability Study. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5(40); 142−153.
Kernis, M.H. (2003). Target article: Toward a Conceptualization of Optimal Self-Esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1−26.doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1401_01
Knee, C.R., Lonsbary, C., Canevello, A., & Patrick, H. (2005).Self-determination and conflict in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 997−1009. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.997
Lopez, F.G., i Rice, K.G. (2006).Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 362−371. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.362
Maslow, A.H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: D. Van Nostrand. 2nd ed.
Metts, S. (1989). An Exploratory Investigation of Deception in Close Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6(2), 159−179.doi:10.1177/026540758900600202
Murray, S.L., i Holmes, J.G. (2009). The architecture of interdependent minds: A motivation-management theory of mutual responsiveness. Psychological Review, 116(4), 908−928.doi:10.1037/a0017015
Neff, K.D., i Harter, S. (2002). The authenticity of conflict resolutions among adult couples: Does women’s other-oriented behavior affect their true selves. Sex Roles, 47(9/10), 403−417.doi:10.1023/a:1021692109040
Peterson, C. (1996). Deception in Intimate Relationships. International Journal of Psychology, 31(6), 279−288.doi:10.1080/002075996401034
Reis, H.T., Collins, W.A., i Berscheid, E. (2000).The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 844−872. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.6.844
Rempel, J.K., Holmes, J.G., i Zanna, M.P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95−112. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
Rogers, C.R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. London: Constable.
Shamsi, A., Ghamarani, A., Samadi, M., i Ahmadzadeh, M. (2012). The Study Of The Validity And Reliability Of The Authentic Personality Scale. Journal Of Psychological Models and Methods, 2(8); 87−99.
Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances/private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: Freeman.
Wickham, R.E. (2013). Perceived authenticity in romantic partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 878−887. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.001
Wood, A.M., Linley, P.A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., i Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(3), 385−399. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.3.385
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava nad objavljenim člancima, a izdavaču daju neekskluzivno pravo da članak objavi, da u slučaju daljeg korišćenja članka bude naveden kao njegov prvi izdavač, kao i da distribuira članak u svim oblicima i medijima. Objavljeni članci distribuiraju se u skladu sa licencom Creative Commons Autorstvo – Deliti pod istim uslovima 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) . Dopušteno je da se delo kopira i distribuira u svim medijima i formatima, da se prerađuje, menja i nadograđuje u bilo koje svrhe, uključujući i komercijalne, pod uslovom da se na pravilan način citiraju njegovi prvobitni autori, postavi link ka originalnoj licenci, naznači da li je delo izmenjeno i da se novo delo objavi pod istom licencom kao i
originalno. Autorima je dozvoljeno da objavljenu verziju rada deponuju u institucionalni ili tematski repozitorijum ili da je objave na ličnim veb stranicama (uključujući i profile na društvenim mrežama, kao što su ResearchGate, Academia.edu, itd.), na sajtu institucije u kojoj su zaposleni, u bilo koje vreme nakon objavljivanja u časopisu, uz adekvatno referisanje.