RETROGRADE TALON INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS VERSUS DISTAL LOCKING PLATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EXTRA-ARTICULAR DISTAL FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES

Abdulrahim Dündar; Deniz  İpek; Şehmuz Kaya

doi:10.5937/sanamed0-45059

Abdulrahim Dündar Hitit University Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Çorum, Turkey
Deniz İpek Hitit University Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Çorum, Turkey
Şehmuz Kaya Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Department of Orthopedics' and Traumatology, Van, Turkey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/sanamed0-45059

Keywords: Talon Distal Fix, locking plate, distal third femur, union, distal locking

Abstract

Introduction: Distal femoral shaft fractures are characterized by their increasing incidence and complexity, presenting a significant challenge in management. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical and radiological results of patients with extra-articular distal third femoral shaft fractures treated using either retrograde Talon Distal Fix nail or a distal femur locking plate.

Material and Method: The study comprised 40 patients aged >18 years who presented at our hospital with a distal third femoral shaft fracture between January 2017 and January 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: Group TDN, treated with retrograde Talon Distal Fix nailing (n=18), and Group DLP, treated with a distal locking plate (n=22). Demographic data, follow-up period, operating time, time to union, range of motion (ROM), mechanism of injury (traffic accident, fall from height, workplace accident, gunshot injury), fracture type, complications, and surgical method were retrospectively recorded. Clinical evaluation included deformity, knee ROM, pain, and the knee total score (KSS) for walking and knee stability.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 48.03±12.31 (min-max: 23-69) years, and the mean follow-up time for all patients was 15.88±2.32 (12-21) months. The mean time to union was 25.55±1.86 (22-30) weeks. Delayed union and non-union rates were similar between the research groups (P=1.000, P=0.673, respectively). Union time (weeks) and mean ROM were not significantly different between the groups (P=0.881, P=0.892, respectively). The mean operation time of the TDF group (48.78±3.94 minutes) was significantly lower than that of the DLP group (62.45±3.33 minutes) (P<0.001). The mean blood loss values of the TDF group (267.5±32.4) were significantly lower than those of the DLP group (324.1±20.2) (P<0.001).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that both retrograde talon nails and locking plates provided satisfactory clinical and radiological results in the management of distal third femoral shaft fractures. Moreover, the retrograde talon nail offered the advantages of a shorter operating time and less intraoperative blood loss.

References

1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–7.doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130.

2. Smith JR, Halliday R, Aquilina AL, Morrison RJ, Yip GC, McArthur J, et al. Distal femoral fractures: the need to review the standard of care. Injury. 2015; 46(6): 1084-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.016.

3. Khan AM, Tang QO, Spicer D. The epidemiology of adult distal femoral shaft fractures in a central london major trauma centre over five years. Open Orthop J. 2017; 11: 1277-91.doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011277.

4. B Redondo-Trasobares, M Sarasa-Roca, J Rosell-Pradas, L Gracia-Villa, J Albareda Albareda. Comparative clinical and biomechanical study of different types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of distal femur fractures. Rev Esp Cir OrtopTraumatol. 2023; 67(3):216-25..doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.01.003.

5. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 1989;(248):13-4.doi:10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004

6. Handolin L, Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E. Retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures – Results in a series of 46 consecutive operations. Injury. 2004;35(5):517-22.doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00191-8.

7. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL, Tornetta III P, Koenig SJ. Clinical outcomes of locked plating of distal femoral fractures in a retrospective cohort. J Orthop Surg Res. 2013;8:43.doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-43.

8. Wang SH, Wu CC, Li WT, Shen HC, Lin LC, Pan RY. Outcomes of distal femoral fractures treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction internal fixation with combined locking plate and interfragmentary screws. Int J Surg.2019; 65:107–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.019.

9. Ehlinger M, Ducrot G, Adam P, Bonnomet F Distal femur fractures. Surgical techniques and a review of the literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(3):353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.10.014

10. Dündar A, İpek D, Zehir S. Treatment of basicervical femoral fracture with retractable talon hip compression screw. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e20951.doi: 10.7759/cureus.20951.

11. Çamurcu Y, Sofu H, Issin A, Koçkara N, Genç E, Çetinkaya M. Is talon tibial intramedullary nailing clinically superior compared to conventional locked nailing? Eklem Hast Cerrahisi. 2017;28(3):152–7.doi: 10.5606/ehc.2017.55349.

12. Zhang F, Zhu L, Li Y, Chen A. Retrograde versus antegrade intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin.2015; 31(10):1897–902.doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1078783.

13. Medici A, Meccariello L, Grubor P, Falzarano G. Indications and limitations of retrograde dynamic nailing in the treatment of shaft and distal femoral fractures in young adult. GIOT.2016;42:1–8.

14. Li B, Gao P, Qiu G, Li T. Locked plate versus retrograde intramedullary nail for periprosthetic femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2016; 40(8): 1689-95.doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2962-9.

15. Fulkerson E, Koval K, Preston CF, Iesaka K, Kummer FJ, Egol KA. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems: a biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates. J Orthop Trauma.2006; 20(2):89–93.doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000199119.38359.96.

16. Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Zardiackas LD, Kregor PJ. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system and the 95-degree angled blade plate for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures in human cadaveric bones with high bone mineral density. J Trauma.2006; 60(4):836-40.doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000208129.10022.f8.

17. Dunbar RP, Egol KA, Jones CB, Ertl JP, Mullis B, Perez E, et al. Locked lateral plating versus retrograde nailing for distal femur fractures: a multicenter randomized trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2023;37(2):70-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002482.

18. Demirtaş A, Azboy I, Özkul E, Gem M, Alemdar C. Comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and bridge plating in the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal femur. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(5):521–6.doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2014.14.0004.

19. Hierholzer C, Von Rüden C, Pötzel T, Woltmann A, Bühren V. Outcome analysis of retrograde nailing and less invasive stabilization system in distal femoral fractures: A retrospective analysis. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(3):243-50. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.80043.

20. Gao K, Gao W, Huang J, Li H, Li F, Tao J, et al. Retrograde nailing versus locked plating of extra-articular distal femoral fractures: comparison of 36 cases. Med Princ Pract. 2013;22(2):161-6.doi: 10.1159/000342664.

21. Gupta SKV, Govindappa CVS, Yalamanchili RK. Outcome of retrograde intramedullary nailing and locking compression plating of distal femoral fractures in adults. OA Orthopaedics. 2013;1(3):23.doi:10.13172/2052-9627-1-3-969

22. Markmiller M, Konrad G, Südkamp N. Femur-LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures: are there differences in outcome and complications? Clin OrthopRelat Res. 2004;426:252-7.doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000141935.86481.ba.

23. Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Marek DJ, Cole PA, Kregor PJ. Operative treatment of acute distal femur fractures: systematic review of 2 comparative studies and 45 case series (1989 to 2005). J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(5):366-71.doi: 10.1097/00005131-200605000-00013.

24. Schandelmaier P, Partenheimer A, Koenemann B, Grün OA, Krettek C. Distal femoral fractures and LISS stabilisation. Injury. 2001;32(suppl 3):55-63.doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00184-x.