APPLICATION OF TRANSANAL TUBE AFTER ANTERIOR RECTAL RESECTION: IMPACT ON PREVENTION OF "ACHILLES HEEL" IN COLORECTAL SURGERY

  • Edin Hodžić Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Sadat Pušina Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Adi Mulabdić Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Samir Muhović Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Ramajana Šukić-Karalić Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/
  • Melika Džeko Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Prof dr sci med Timur Cerić Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Clinic for Oncology, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Keywords: Equipment and supplies, postoperative complications, rectal neoplasms, surgical procedure

Abstract


Aim: The aim of our study was to investigate the potential reduction in the likelihood of anastomotic leakage occurrence in patients undergoing open anterior resection of the rectum without a protective stoma for stage III adenocarcinoma, by employing a transanal tube after performing stapled colorectal anastomosis.

Results: Considering the influence of all included risk factors, male gender (p=0.032; OR=2.873) and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (p=0.033; OR=2.873) demonstrated an increased likelihood of anastomotic leakage, while the presence of a transanal tube (p=0.043; OR=0.349; 95% CI: 0.126, 0.966) was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the likelihood of anastomotic leakage. T-test revealed that patients with anastomotic leakage without a placed tube had a statistically significantly longer mean postoperative hospitalization (20.94 days) compared to those with a transanal tube (19.43 days) (t=2.375; p=0.025). Kaplan-Meier analysis didn’t show a statistically significant difference in the average estimated time to the occurrence of anastomotic leakage between patients without (3.86 days) and with a transanal tube (4.58 days) (p=0.057).

Conclusion: Our study found that the placement of a transanal tube after colorectal anastomosis may be associated with a reduced likelihood of anastomotic leakage and shorter hospitalization in case leakage occurs. Additionally, although no statistically significant difference was found in the effect of the tube on the occurrence of anastomotic leakage depending on the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, the indication for its use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may be of particular benefit.

References

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(1):7–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21442.

American Cancer Society. Rectal cancer treatment, by stage. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/colon-rectal-cancer/treating/by-stage-rectum.html (25 February 2024.)

Chen VW, Hsieh M, Charlton ME, Ruiz BA, Karlitz J, Altekruse SF et al. Analysis of stage and clinical/prognostic factors for colon and rectal cancer from SEER registries: AJCC and collaborative stage data collection system. Cancer. 2014; 120(0 0):3793-806. doi:10.1002/cncr.29056.

Argilés G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, Hochhauser D, Salazar R, Iveson T et al. Localised colon cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020; 31(10):1291–305.doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.022

Giesen LJX, Olthof PB, Elferink MAG, Verhoef C, Dekker JWT. Surgery for rectal cancer: Differences in resection rates among hospitals in the Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021; 47(9):2384–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.030.

Degiuli M, Elmore U, De Luca R, De Nardi P, Tomatis M, Biondi A, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer (RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group. Colorectal Dis. 2022; 24(3):264-76. doi:10.1111/codi.15997.

Tsai YY, Chen WT. Management of anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery: a review article. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019; 10(6):1229-37. doi:10.21037/jgo.2019.07.07.

Fang AH, Chao W, Ecker M. Review of colonic anastomotic leakage and prevention methods. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(12):4061. doi:10.3390/jcm9124061.

Chinelli J, Costa J, Moreira E, Rodríguez G. Anastomotic failure in colorectal surgery. Risk factors and therapeutic management. Rev Argent Coloproctol. 2020; 31(4). doi: 10.46768/racp.v31i04.84.

Cwaliński J, Hermann J, Paszkowski J, Banasiewicz T. Dehiscence of colorectal anastomosis treated with noninvasive procedures. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023; 18(1):128-34. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2022.121701.

Favuzza J. Risk factors for anastomotic leak, consideration for proximal diversion, and appropriate use of drains. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021; 34(6):366-70. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1735266.

Tsalikidis C, Mitsala A, Mentonis VI, Romanidis K, Pappas-Gogos G, Tsaroucha AK, et al. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery: Where are ee and where are we going?. Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(3):3111-37. doi:10.3390/curroncol30030236.

Xia S, Wu W, Ma L, Luo L, Yu L, Li Y. Transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1198549. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1198549.

Zhao S, Zhang L, Gao F, Wu M, Zheng J, Bai L, et al. Transanal drainage tube use for preventing anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2021; 156(12):1151-8. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4568.

Luo Y, Zhu CK, Wu DQ, Zhou LB, Wang CS. Effect comparison of three different types of transanal drainage tubes after anterior resection for rectal cancer. BMC Surg. 2020; 20(1):166. doi:10.1186/s12893-020-00811-x.

Doyle DJ, Hendrix JM, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification. [Updated 2023 Aug 17]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441940/

McShane JN, Armstrong DE. Retrospective analysis of the safety of FOLFOX compared to CAPOX for adjuvant treatment of Stage III Colorectal Cancer in Newfoundland patients. Gastrointest Disord. 2022; 4(3):214-22. doi: 10.3390/gidisord4030020.

Weiser MR. AJCC 8th Edition: Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25:1454-5. doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6462-1.

Charlson ME, Carrozzino D, Guidi J, Patierno C. Charlson Comorbidity Index: A critical review of clinimetric properties. Psychother Psychosom. 2022; 91(1):8–35. doi:10.1159/000521288.

Townsend CM Jr, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Colon and rectum. In: Townsend CM Jr, ed. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2022:1381-3. eBook

Kim IY. Role of mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2020; 75(2):79-85. doi:10.4166/kjg.2020.75.2.79.

Dellinger PE. Antibiotic prophylaxis for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2020; 230(1):168-9. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.10.004.

Reyaz I, Reyaz N, Salah QM, Nagi TK, Mian AR, Bhatti AH, et al. Comparison of high ligation versus low ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery (IMA) on short-term and long-term outcomes in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Cureus. 2023; 15(5):e39406. doi:10.7759/cureus.39406.

Thomas MS, Margolin DA. Management of colorectal anastomotic leak. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016; 29(2):138-44. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1580630.

Arron MNN, Greijdanus NG, Ten Broek RPG, Dekker JWT, van Workum F, van Goor H, et al. Trends in risk factors of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery (2011-2019): a Dutch population-based study. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23(12):3251-61. doi:10.1111/codi.15911.

Zarnescu EC, Zarnescu NO, Costea R. Updates of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(12):2382. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11122382.

Tan DJH, Yaow CYL, Mok HT, Ng CH, Tai CH, Tham HY, et al. The influence of diabetes on postoperative complications following colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2021; 25(3):267-78. doi:10.1007/s10151-020-02373-9.

Popescu RC, Leopa N, Dumitru E, Mitroi AF, Tocia C, Dumitru A, et al. Influence of type II diabetes mellitus on postoperative complications following colorectal cancer surgery. Exp Ther Med. 2022; 24(4):611. doi:10.3892/etm.2022.11548.

Cirocchi R, Mari G, Amato B, Tebala GD, Popivanov G, Avenia S, et al. The Dilemma of the level of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery ligation in the treatment of diverticular disease: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(4):917. doi:10.3390/jcm11040917.

Zhang X, Wu Q, Gu C, Hu T, Bi L, Wang Z. The effect of increased body mass index values on surgical outcomes after radical resection for low rectal cancer. Surg Today. 2019; 49(5):401-9. doi:10.1007/s00595-019-01778-w.

Carboni F, Valle M, Levi Sandri GB, Giofrè M, Federici O, Zazza S, et al. Transanal drainage tube: alternative option to defunctioning stoma in rectal cancer surgery?. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 5:6. doi:10.21037/tgh.2019.10.16.

Ersoz H. Despite the effects of tension and intraluminal pressure, which suture technique is the Most appropriate for prevention of air leakage or anastomotic dehiscence in tracheal anastomoses in the short term? An experimental research on ex vivo model. Ann Thorac Cardiovas. 2019; 25(5):231-6. doi:10.5761/atcs.oa.19-00056.

Pyo DH, Huh JW, Lee WY, Yun SH, Kim HC, Cho YB, et al. The role of transanal tube after low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A propensity score-matched study. Surgery. 2023; 173(2):335-41. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2022.10.033.

Reischl S, Wilhelm D, Friess H, Neumann PA. Innovative approaches for induction of gastrointestinal anastomotic healing: an update on experimental and clinical aspects. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021; 406(4):971-80. doi:10.1007/s00423-020-01957-1.

Sueda T, Tei M, Mori S, Nishida K, Yasuyama A, Nomura M, et al. Clinical impact of transanal drainage tube on anastomosis leakage following minimally invasive resection without diverting stoma in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023; 33(6):608-16. doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000001237.

Brandl A, Czipin S, Mittermair R, Weiss S, Pratschke J, Kafka-Ritsch R. Transanal drainage tube reduces rate and severity of anastomotic leakage in patients with colorectal anastomosis: A case controlled study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016; 6:12-6. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2016.01.003.

Wang Z, Liang J, Chen J, Mei S, Liu Q. Effectiveness of a transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020; 21(5):1441-4. doi:10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.5.1441.

Yang CS, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Choi JI, et al. Rectal tube drainage reduces major anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2016; 18(12):O445-52. doi:10.1111/codi.13506.

Guo C, Fu Z, Qing X, Deng M. Prophylactic transanal drainage tube placement for preventing anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2022; 24(11):1273-84. doi:10.1111/codi.16231.

Fukada M, Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Imai H, Tanaka Y, Yamaguchi K, et al. Risk and early predictive factors of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17(1):178. doi:10.1186/s12957-019-1716-3.

Sparreboom CL, van Groningen JT, Lingsma HF, Wouters MWJM, Menon AG, Kleinrensink GJ, et al. Different risk factors for early and late colorectal anastomotic leakage in a nationwide audit. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018; 61(11):1258-66. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000001202.

Published
2024/04/28
Section
Original article