ABDOMINAL PSEUDOCYST DUE TO VENTRICULOPERITONEAL SHUNT: AN UNCOMMON COMPLICATION OF A COMMON NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURE

  • Muath Ibrahim ALfallaj Qassim University, College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Unaizah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • Sajad Ahmad Salati Qassim University, College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Unaizah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • Faiza Riaz Malik Department of surgery, Qassim university Medical city QUMC, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Keywords: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt, pseudocyst, neurosurgery, hydrocephalus, cerebrospinal fluid, shunt revision

Abstract


For over a century, the ventriculoperitoneal shunt has been a standard neurosurgical procedure for treating hydrocephalus. However, this procedure is associated with a variety of complications. One uncommon but notable complication is the abdominal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pseudocyst. This pseudocyst is histologically characterized by a fibrous wall devoid of an epithelial lining, and its exact etiopathogenesis remains unclear. Patients with abdominal CSF pseudocysts often present with nonspecific symptoms, and treatment is tailored to each individual's clinical situation. This article reviews the epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical characteristics, histology, imaging features, and available treatment options for abdominal CSF pseudocysts.

References

Risfandi M, Celia C, Shen R. Abdominal wall pseudocyst as a complication of ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion: a case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2022;41:23. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.23.29426.

Guest BJ, Merjanian MH, Chiu EF, Canders CP. Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst diagnosed with point-of-care ultrasound. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2019;3(1):43-6. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2018.11.40780.

Masoudi MS, Rasafian M, Naghmehsanj Z, Ghaffarpasand F. Intraperitoneal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst with ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2017; 14(3):56–8. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_94_16.

Bryant MS, Bremer AM, Tepas JJ 3rd, Mollitt DL, Nquyen TQ, Talbert JL. Abdominal complications of ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Case reports and review of the literature. Am Surg. 1988;54(1):50-5.

Kariyattil R, Steinbok P, Singhal A, Cochrane DD. Ascites and abdominal pseudocysts following ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: variations of the same theme. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(5 Suppl):350-3. doi: 10.3171/ped.2007.106.5.350.

Comba A, Gülenç N, Çaltepe G, Dagçınar A, Yüce Ö, Kalaycı AG, et al. Ascites and abdominal pseudocyst: two uncommon ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications in two cases. Turk J Pediatr. 2013;55(6):655-8.

Harsh GR. Peritoneal shunt for hydrocephalus, utilizing the fimbria of the fallopian tube for entrance to the peritoneal cavity. J Neurosurg. 1954;11(3):284-94. doi: 10.3171/jns.1954.11.3.0284.

Singh R J, Suman B K, Dudhani S, Sinha A K, Kumar. Recurrent giant abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudo cyst: A case report and review of literature. Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports. 2022: 85:102410. doi: 10.1016/j.epsc.2022.102410.

Ohba S, Kinoshita Y, Tsutsui M, Nakagawa T, Shimizu K, Takahashi T, et al. Formation of abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(11):838-42. doi: 10.2176/nmc.52.838.

Wang HC, Tong YL, Li SW, Chen MS, Wang BD, Chen H. Hemorrhagic abdominal pseudocyst following ventriculoperitoneal shunt: a case report. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01161-y.

Tomiyama A, Harashina JI, Kimura H, Ito K, Honda Y, Yanai H, et al. An intra-abdominal pseudocyst around a ventriculoperitoneal shunt due to Streptococcus infection 7 years after shunt surgery. Surg Res Pract. 2014;2014:898510. doi: 10.1155/2014/898510.

Salomão JF, Leibinger RD. Abdominal pseudocysts complicating CSF shunting in infants and children. Report of 18 cases. PediatrNeurosurg. 1999;31:274–8. doi: 10.1159/000028875.

Mobley LW, Doran SE, Hellbusch LC. Abdominal pseudocyst: predisposing factors and treatment algorithm. PediatrNeurosurg. 2005;41(2):77-83. doi: 10.1159/000085160.

Gmeiner M, Wagner H, van Ouwerkerk WJR, Senker W, Holl K, Gruber A. Abdominal pseudocysts and peritoneal catheter revisions: surgical long-term results in pediatric hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg. 2018;111:912-20. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.032.

Kaplan M, Ozel SK, Akgun B, Kazez A, Kaplan S. Hepatic pseudocyst as a result of ventriculoperitoneal shunts: case report and review of the literature. PediatrNeurosurg. 2007;43(6):501-3. doi: 10.1159/000108795.

Yousaf MN, Naqvi HA, Kane S, Chaudhary FS, Hawksworth J, Nayar VV, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid liver pseudocyst: A bizarre long-term complication of ventriculoperitoneal shunt: A case report. World J Hepatol. 2023;15(5):715-24. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i5.715.

Shetty D, Diyora B, Gadgil N, Amarapurkar A. Intriguing case of giant intra-abdominal pseudocyst: Diagnostic dilemma. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2020;14(5):58-60.

Achufusi TGO, Chebaya P, Rawlins S. Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst as a complication of ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9363. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9363.

Birbilis T, Kontogianidis K, Matis G, Theodoropoulou E, Efremidou E, Argyropoulou P: Intraperitoneal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst. A rare complication of ven- triculoperitoneal shunt. Chirurgia(Bucur). 2008; 103(3):351–3.

Kumar M, Joshi A, Tripathi M, Mohindra S, Nalin S. Central dilemma in CSF pseudocyst - A case series and review of literature. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2022;13(4):753-8. doi: 10.25259/JNRP-2021-7-25.

Rainov N, Schobess A, Heidecke V, Burkert W. Abdominal CSF pseudocysts in patients with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Report of fourteen cases and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;127(1-2):73-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01808551.

Leung GK. Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pseudocyst presented with inferior vena caval obstruction and hydronephrosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26(9):1243-5. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1221-z.

MPharm SM, Chowdhury YA, Soon WC, Rodrigues D, Lo WB. A rare case of inferior vena cava occlusion secondary to abdominal pseudocyst associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt-case report and review of literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2022;38(6):1233-6. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05391-6.

Ahmed I, Singh S, Arora RK. Hydrocephalus recurrence and intestinal obstruction due to giant CSF pseudocyst. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34(3):393-4. doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-3722-0.

Xue Y, Mranda GM, Wei T, Wang Y, Zhou XG, Liu ZP, et al. The shadow in the darkness: case report on adhesive intestinal obstruction secondary to ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter in an elderly patient. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;77:103661. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103661.

Buyukyavuz BI, Duman L, Karaaslan T, Turedi A. Hyponatremic seizure due to huge abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocsyt in a child with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: a case report. Turk Neurosurg. 2012;22(5):656-8. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.3978-10.1.

Wang B, Hasadsri L, Wang H. Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst mimicking full-term pregnancy. J Surg Case Rep. 2012;2012(7):6. doi: 10.1093/jscr/2012.7.6.

Ivan Y, Hauptman J, Marin JR. Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst diagnosed by point-of-care ultrasound. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016;32(6):408–9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000826.

Raghavendra BN, Epstein FJ, Subramanyam BR, Becker MH. Ultrasonographic evaluation of intraperitoneal CSF pseudocyst. Report of 3 cases. Childs Brain. 1981;8(1):39-43. doi: 10.1159/000119967.

Dabdoub CB, Dabdoub CF,Chavez M, Villarroel J, Ferrufino JL, Coimbra A, et al. Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst: a comparative analysis between children and adults. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30(4):579–89. doi: 10.1007/s00381-014-2370-2.

Schmieder S, Schraml F. CSF-oma identification with nuclear medicine shunt-o-gram. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44(5):399-400. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002485.

Fatani GM, Bustangi NM, Kamal JS, Sabbagh AJ. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt-associated abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocysts and the role of laparoscopy and a proposed management algorithm in its treatment. A report of 2 cases. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2020;25(4):320-6. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2020.4.20200053.

Published
2025/02/18
Section
Review article