Students’ attitudes about the ethics of using animals for experimental purposes
Abstract
This study aims at discovering the ethics level of the students who are attending the Faculty of Medical Sciences, the Faculty of Engineering Sciences and postgraduate students with experience of use laboratory animals in experimental purposes at University of Kragujevac. Focus of this study is on ethical segment of use of laboratory animals for experimental purposes and the correlation between the manifested level of ethics and various other factors like gender, high-school education, GPA, educational level of parents and desired affiliation after the graduation.
The cross sectional study was conducted with 175 participants. In data collection, a questionnaire was used consisting of questions concerning sociodemographical characteristics and two scales – Gallup and Beckstead’s scale and a scale specially designed for the purposes of this research. The data were processed by using the methods of descriptive statistics, t-test for independent samples, single factor analysis of variance and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
The results have shown that the correlation between the manifested level of ethics of using animals in experimental purposes and gender, high-school education, grade point average, field of study or desired affiliation after the graduation is statistically significant. The differences in the results between students of pharmacy and the students of engineering sciences are also statistically significant. Cronbach's alpha were estimated at 0.786, which implies that the internal consistency of scales shows significantly high level of reliability. The students from both fields, pharmacy and mechanical engineering, have shown a considerable level of ethics concerning the use of animals for laboratory purposes.
Key words: ethics, laboratory animal, attitudeReferences
Baticevic A. Eticki i pravni okviri za zastitu dobobiti eksperimentalnih zivotinja u Republici Srbiji. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine. Advokatska Komora Vojvodine 2012;84(11):726-51.
Pravilnik za rad sa eksperimentalnim zivotinjama. Farmaceutski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, septembar 2008. Available at:
Directive 86/609/EEC, Brussels, 1986.
Phillips CJC. Effects of field of study on university students’ attitudes towards animal issues. Animal Welfare 2014;23:459-66.
Izmirli S, Phillips CJC. The relationship between student consumption of animal products and attitudes to animals in Europe and Asia. British Food Journal 2011;113:436-50.
Phillips CJB, Izmirli S, Aldavood J, et al. An international comparison of female and male students’ attitudes to the use of animals. Animals 2011;1:7-26.
World Society for the Protection of Animals: An overwiew of Animal Protection Legislation, 2006. Available at:
Gallup GG, Beckstead JW. Attitudes toward animal research. Am Psychol. 1988;43:474–6.
Metzger MM. Attitudes toward animal research: revisiting Gallup and Beckstead (1988). The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education (JUNE) 2014;12(2):154-8.
Phillips CJC, Izmirli S, Aldavood SJ, et al. Students' attitudes to animal welfare and rights in Europe and Asia. Animal Welfare 2012;21(1):87-100.
Li PJ, Davey G. Culture, Reform Politics, and Future Directions: A Review of China’s Animal Protection Challenge. Society & Animals 2012;21(1):34-53.
Davey G. Chinese University Students’ Attitudes Toward the Ethical Treatment and Welfare of Animals. Journal of applied animal welfare science 2006;9(4):289–97.
Philips CJC, McCullough S. Student attitudes on animal sentience and use of animals in society. Journal of Biological Education 2005;40:1-8.
Signal TD, Taylor N. Attitude to Animals and Empathy: Comparing Animal Protection and General Community Samples. Anthrozoös 2007;20(2):125–30.
McKendree MG, Croney CC, Widmar NJ. Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare. J Anim Sci. 2014;92(7):3161-73.
Williams JM, Muldoon J, Lawrence A. Children and their pets: Exploring the relationships between pet ownership, pet attitudes, attachment to pets and empathy. Education and Health 2010;28(1):12-5.
Herzog HA. Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions: A Review. Anthrozoös 2007;20(1):7-21.
Signal TD, Taylor N. Attitudes to animals: Demographics within a community sample. Society & Animals 2006;14(2):147–57.
Ickes W, Gesn PR, Graham T. Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships 2000;7(1):95-109.
Mestre MV, Samper P, Frías MD, Tur AM. Are women more empathetic than men? A longitudinal study in adolescence. Span J Psychol. 2009;12(1):76-83.
Hazel SJ, Signal TD, Taylor N. Can teaching veterinary and animal-science students about animal welfare affect their attitude toward animals and human-related empathy? J Vet Med Educ. 2011;38(1):74-83.
Magalhães E, Salgueira AP, Costa P, Costa MJ. Empathy in senior year and first year medical students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:52.
Chen DC, Kirshenbaum DS, Yan J, Kirshenbaum E, Aseltine RH. Characterizing changes in student empathy throughout medical school. Med Teach. 2012;34(4):305-11.
Tavakol S, Dennick R, Tavakol M. Empathy in UK medical students: differences by gender, medical year and specialty interest. Educ Prim Care. 2011;22(5):297-303.
Izmirli S, Yigit A, Phillips CJC. Attitudes of Australian and Turkish Students of Veterinary Medicine Toward Nonhuman Animals and their Careers. Society & animals 2014;22(6):580-601.
Paul ES, Serpell JA. Childhood pet keeping and humane attitudes in young adulthood. Animal Welfare 1993;2:321-37.
Serpell JA. Factors influencing veterinary students’ career choices and attitudes to animals. Animal Welfare 2005;32(4):491-6.
Westgarth C, Heron J, Ness AR, et al. Family Pet Ownership during Childhood: Findings from a UK Birth Cohort and Implications for Public Health Research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010;7:3704-29.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).