The Impact of Body Mass Index on the Initial In-Brace Correction in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis
Abstract
Background/Aim: Many factors affect initial in-brace correction and treatment outcome in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Previous studies have observed contradictory results on the role of BMI in orthotic treatment. The aim of this study was to examine whether BMI impacts in-brace correction, isolated and in relation to other predictive factors (curve magnitude, curve location and Risser sign).
Methods: A retrospective study has been conducted on patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cheneau-Sobernheim brace, that had no prior treatment. The collected and analysed data included patient demographics, BMI percentile and radiological parameters (curve magnitude in Cobb angle, curve location, Risser sign). The initial in-brace correction was expressed as a percentage of Cobb angle reduction in the brace as opposed to Cobb angle out of brace. Patients were categorised into groups according to their BMI, expressed in percentiles, ie: low BMI (< 5 percentiles), normal BMI (5-85 percentiles) and high BMI (> 85 percentiles). To determine the significant difference and correlation relationship between the examined variables, variance tests, t-test with unequal variance, and Pearson correlation coefficient have been used.
Results: The cohort study comprised 213 patients (170 females and 43 males) with a mean age of 13.5 years at brace prescription. Low BMI has been detected in 10 % patients, normal BMI in 78 % and high BMI in 10 % patients. No significant difference in in-brace correction has been found between BMI groups, nor has there been any significant correlation between BMI and in-brace correction. Regarding other factors, significant difference within BMI groups was found between in-brace correction and curve location, as well as in-brace correction and Risser sign. Lumbar curves had significantly better in-brace correction than thoracic curves. Significant correlations between in-brace correction and curve magnitude, curve location and Risser sign were detected.
Conclusion: The results of the present study show that, as an independent factor, BMI does not impact in-brace correction. Other factors, such as curve magnitude, curve location and Risser sign, play a more significant role in the orthotic treatment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
References
2. Grivas TB, Vasiliadis E, Mouzakis V, Mihas C, Koufopoulos G. Association between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis prevalence and age at menarche in different geographic latitudes. Scoliosis. 2006;1:9.
3. Negrini S, Atanasio S, Fusco C, Zaina F. Effectiveness of complete conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (bracing and exercises) based on SOSORT management criteria: results according to the SRS criteria for bracing studies - SOSORT award 2009 winner. Scoliosis. 2009;4:19.
4. Upadhyay SS, Nelson IW, Ho EK, Hsu LC, Leong JC. New prognostic factors to predict the final outcome of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1995;20(5):537–45.
5. Katz DE, Herring JA, Browne RH, Kelly DM, Birch JG. Brace wear control of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(6):1343–52.
6. Zaina F, Donzelli S, Luisini M, Negrini S. Correlation between in-brace radiographic correction and short time brace results. Stud Health Technol Inform.2012;176:342-5.
7. Clin J, Aubin C-É, Parent S. Biomechanical simulation and analysis of scoliosis correction using a fusionless intravertebral epiphyseal device. Spine. 2015;40(6):369–76.
8. Chuandong Lang , Zifang Huang , Wenyuan Sui , Muping Di , Shaofu He et al. Factors That Influence In-Brace Correction in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. World Neurosurg 2019 Mar;123:e597-e603.
9. Weinstein LS, Dolan L, Wright JG, Dobbs MB. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 2013. 369:1512-21.
10. El Hawary R, Zaaroor-Regev D, Floman Y, Loonner BS, Alkhalife YI, Betz RR. Brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors for failure—a literature review. Spine J. 2019 Dec;19(12):1917-25.
11. Emans JB, Kaelin A, Bancel P, Hall JE, Miller ME. The Boston bracing system for idiopathic scoliosis. Follow-up results in 295 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986. 11(8):792-801.
12. Landauer F, Wimmer C, Behensky H: Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6-month follow-up. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003, 6 (3–4): 201-7.
13. Van den Bogaart M, Van Royen J Barend, Tsjitske M Haanstra, De Kleuver M, Sayf S, A Faraj: Predictive factors for brace treatment outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a best-evidence synthesis. Eur Spine J. 2019 Mar;28(3):511-25.
14. Chuandong Lang , Zifang Huang , Wenyuan Sui , Muping Di, Shaofu He, Hengwei Fan et al. Factors That Influence In-Brace Correction in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. World Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;123:e597-e603.
15. O'Neill, Patrick J, Karol, Lori A., Shindle, Michael K. et al. Decreased orthotic effectiveness in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 87(5):1069-74
16. Goodbody CM, Asztalos IB, Sankar WN, Flynn JM. It's not just the big kids: both high and low BMI impact bracing success for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 2016 ;10(5):395-404.
17. Weixiang Sun, Minghui Sun, Xiaodong Qin, Zhou Jin. Low body mass index can be predictive of bracing failure in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 2017 Jun;26(6):1665-69.
18. Lori A.Karol, Wingfield Jessica J, Virostek Donald, Felton Kevin, ChanHee Jo. The Influence of Body Habitus on Documented Brace Wear and Progression in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Mar;40(3):e171-e175.
19. Clin J, Aubin C-É, Parent S. Biomechanical simulation and analysis of scoliosis correction using a fusionless intravertebral epiphyseal device. Spine. 2015;40(6):369–76.
20. Zaina Fabio, Donzelli Sabrina, Negrini Stefano. Overweight is not predictive of bracing failure in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results from a retrospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2017 Jun;26(6):1670-1675.
21. Katz Donald E, Herring J Anthony, Browne Richard H, Kelly Derek M, Birch John G. Brace wear control of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jun;92(6):1343-52.
22. Rahman T, Borkhuu B, Littleton AG, Sample W, Moran E, Campbell S, et al. Electronic monitoring of scoliosis brace wear compliance. J Child Orthop. 2010;4(4):343–7.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).