Objective Structured Practical Examination as a tool of assessing practical skills in Clinical Physiology: perceptions of medical students and faculty
Perception of OSPE
Abstract
Background / Aim: Competence can be acquired in medical education if the assessment of students is multidimensional. Traditional practical assessments focus on testing the cognitive domain and compromise practical skills evaluation. The Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) assesses skill-based competencies. The present study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of OSPE through the perception of students and mentors.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 medical students and 15 medical faculties enrolled from Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya medical college, Churu (Rajasthan, India). The study included OSPE stations, conducted three OSPE sessions and obtained post-session feedback through a questionnaire, answered on 5 points Likert scale. The researchers calculated the response on various aspects of OSPE with percentages.
Results: Students showed 94.4 % agreement for OSPE as a good learning experience and 93.5 % were satisfied with the content of OSPE. Students' perception of OSPE as a reliable and fair tool for examination and administration was 94.66 % and 56.40 %, respectively. Although, 69.5 % of students agreed upon OSPE as a valuable tool compared with the traditional reviews. The overall agreement of faculty for the competence of OSPE was 75.74 %.
Conclusion: The acceptance of OSPE by medical students and faculty may lead to the introduction of this tool in assessing practical skills in medical teaching and helping students better acquire knowledge and skills and assisting faculty in teaching modifications, as per the needs of students. So, OSPE supplements the traditional methods in clinical physiology practical assessments.
References
Baral B. Objective structured practical evaluation: Comparison with the traditional practical examination and students perception. Nepal Med Coll J 2017;19(2):84-9.
Ananthakrishnan N. Objective structured clinical/ practical examination (OSCE/OSPE). J Postgrad Med1993;39(2):82-4.
Hilliard RI, Tallent SE. The use of an objective structured clinical examination with post-graduate residents in pediatrics. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152(1):74-8.
Shruti B, Sabitha M. A comparative study between the conventional practical exam and objective structured
practical exam as an assessment tool in physiology. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol 2015;16(3):559-63.
Gupta P, Dewan P, Singh T. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Revisited. Med Educ 2010;47(11):911-20.
Lowry S. Assessment of students. BMJ 1993;306:51-4.
Aarti S, Nilima S, Tandon OP. The comparison of OSPE with conventional physiology practical assessment. IAMSE 2004;14(2):54-7.
Nayar U. Objective structured practical examinations. In: Bijlani RL Nayar U (eds). Teaching physiology, trends and tools. New Delhi: All India Institute of Medical Science; 1983. p. 151-159.
Hasan S, Malik, Hamad A, Khan H, Bilal M. Conventional/ Traditional Practical Examination(CPE/TDPE) Versus Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Pak J Physiol 2009;5(1);58-64.
Alsaid AH, Al-Sheikh M. Student and faculty perception of objective structured clinical examination: A teaching hospital experience. Saudi J Med Med Sci 2017;5:49-55.
Petrusa ER, Blackwell TA, Rogers LP, Saydjari C, Parcel S, Guckian JC. An objective measure of clinical performance. Am J Med 1987;83:34-42.
Pinaki W, Vrinda D. Objective Structured Practical Examination vs. Traditional Clinical Examination in Human Physiology: Student's perception. IJMSPH 2013;2(3):543-47.
Mamatha S D, Kanyakumari D H. Objective structured practical examination/objective structured clinical examination as an assessment tool: Faculty perception. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2018;8(11):1577-80.
Duffield KE, Spencer JA. A survey of medical students' views about the purposes and fairness of the assessment. Med Educ 2002;36(9):879-86.
Imani M. Is OSCE successful in pediatrics? J Med Educ 2005;6(2):153-8.
Woodburn J, Sutcliffe N. The reliability, validity and evaluation of the objective structured clinical examination in podiatry. Assess Eval High Educ 1996;21:131-47.
Pierre RB, Wierenga A, Barton M, Branday JM, Christie CD. Student evaluation of an OSCE in pediatrics at the University of the West Indies, Jamaica. BMC Med Educ 2004;4:22. Available from:URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/4/22.
Brand HS, Schoonheim-Klein M. Is the OSCE more stressful? Examination anxiety and its consequences in different assessment methods in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 2009;13:147–53. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00554.x
Adome RO. The introduction of objective structured clinical/practical examination in undergraduate bachelor of pharmacy student assessment in Makerere university. Available from: http://www.faimer.org/education/fellows/abstracts/06adome. [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 12].
Radhika G, Dara AK, Varalaxmi KP, Bhavani C. Perceptions of the introduction of objective structured practical examination (OSPE)/objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): A pilot study carried out in Government Medical College, Ananthapuramu andhra Pradesh, India. J NTR Univ Health Sci 2015;4:145-9.
Verhoeven BH, Hamer JG, Scherpbier AJ, Hoogenboom RJ, Van der Vlenten CP. The effect on reliability of adding a separate written assessment component to an objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ 2000;34:525-9.
Rafique S, Rafique H. Students feedback on teaching and assessment at Nishtar medical college, Multan. J Pak Med Assoc 2013;63:1205-9.
Ranga Rao D, Parameswari Babu U, Kalyan Chakravarthy CV, Ramya N. Objective structured practical examination (OSPE) as a tool in formative assessment of II MBBS students, in pathology. Int J Res Med Sci 2018 Jan;6(1):221-4.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).