Aetiology and Frequency of Coma in Emergency Department of the Primary Healthcare Centre

  • Nada Banjac Emergency Department, Primary Healthcare Centre Banja Luka, the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Nevena Aleksić Služba hitne medicinske pomoći, Banja Luka
  • Žana M Maksimović Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
  • Renata Hadžić Emergency Department, Primary Healthcare Centre Banja Luka, the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Dalibor Mihajlović Emergency Department, Primary Healthcare Centre Banja Luka, the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Keywords: Coma;, Differential diagnosis, Prehospital treatment, Emergency Department

Abstract


Background/Aim: Coma is the most severe disturbance of consciousness from which the patient cannot wake up and in which there is no verbal and motor response or opening of the eyes. The aim of the research was to establish the frequency of occurrence of coma and the aetiology of coma in the Banja Luka Emergency Department (ED). Also, the goal was to analyse the accuracy of the referral diagnosis and potential factors that can help the doctor in making a correct diagnosis.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. In the ED database, in the period from January to September 2022, all patients diagnosed with coma have been found. The gender and age of the patient, vital parameters, performed diagnostic methods and therapy were recorded. The referral diagnosis, the department to which the patient was referred, as well as the final diagnosis determined in hospital conditions were recorded.

Results: In the period from January to September 2022 there were 95 patients who were diagnosed with coma. The average age of the patients was 67.76 ± 16.56 years, there were 56 (58.9 %) men and 39 (41.1 %) women. Of that number, 41 (43.2 %) patients were diagnosed with hypoglycaemic coma and those patients were treated in the field. Out of 54 patients, 32 (59.3 %) patients had a confirmed referral diagnosis, while 22 (40.7 %) patients had another diagnosis established at the hospital. All patients with suspected intracranial bleeding or stroke were correctly diagnosed and adequately referred, while all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sepsis and shock were incorrectly referred (χ2 = 30.563, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The most frequent were coma caused by hypoglycaemia and coma caused by brain ischaemia and non-traumatic bleeding, which were adequately recognised and treated and/or referred. Coma caused by sepsis and shock of different aetiology was not recognised as such and was referred to a neurologist, where precious time was wasted. In order to reduce errors in the field, it is necessary to pay more attention to the anamnestic data on diseases and perform a somatic and neurological examination adequately.

References

1. Karpenko A, Keegan J. Diagnosis of coma. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2021 Feb;39(1):155-72.

2. Horsting MW, Franken MD, Meulenbelt J, van Klei WA, de Lange DW. The etiology and outcome of non-traumatic coma in critical care: a systematic review. BMC Anesthesiol 2015 Apr 29;15:65. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0041-9.

3. Groshi AGM, Enicker B. Factors influencing the outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain injury following road traffic crashes. S Afr J Surg 2022 Dec;60(4):273-7.

4. Pålsson P, Guldberg J, Gustafsson JM, Aiff H. Coma, severe hypotension and pinpoint pupils after olanzapine intoxication in the intensive care unit with symptom reversal after administration of flumazenil. Am J Case Rep 2022 Dec 1;23:e938387. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.938387.

5. Huff JS, Tadi P. Coma. [Updated: 4 Jul 2022]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. [Cited: 25 Oct 2022]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430722/

6. Brunker C, Harris R. How accurate is the AVPU scale in detecting neurological impairment when used by general ward nurses? An evaluation study using simulation and a questionnaire. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2015 Apr;31(2):69-75.

7. Teasdale GM, Allan D, Brennan P, McElhinney E, Mackinnon L. Forty years on: updating the Glasgow Coma Scale. Nursing Times 2014;110(42):12-6.

8. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Injury-Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group, Disorders of Consciousness Task Force; Seel RT, Sherer M, Whyte J, Katz DI, Giacino JT, Rosenbaum AM, et al. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010 Dec;91(12):1795-813.

9. Starmark JE, Stålhammar D, Holmgren E. The Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). Manual and guidelines. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1988;91(1-2):12-20.

10. Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, Manno EM, McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score Ann Neurol 2005;58(4):585-93.

11. Forsberg S, Höjer J, Enander C, Ludwigs U. Coma and impaired consciousness in the emergency room: characteristics of poisoning versus other causes. Emerg Med J 2009 Feb;26(2):100-2.

12. Forsberg S, Höjer J, Ludwigs U, Nyström H. Metabolic vs structural coma in the ED--an observational study. Am J Emerg Med 2012 Nov;30(9):1986-90.

Published
2022/12/28
Section
Professional article