Advent of Artificial Intelligence in Orthognathic Surgery: Advancements and Challenges

  • Anju Sharma
  • Ginpreet Kaur
  • Hardeep Singh Tuli
  • Raunak Singh Chhabra
  • Rashmi Rana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/scriptamed55-46960
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Surgery-first approach, Computer aided design and manufacturing, Surgical System and Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Computer Aided Surgical Simulation

Abstract


Orthognathic surgery is a procedure used to correct facial deformities and jaw bone misalignment. The use of technology, specifically virtual surgical planning (VSP), has become increasingly prevalent in preoperative planning for orthognathic surgery. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) imaging has enabled computer-aided modelling. Artificial intelligence (AI) implementation has transformed orthognathic surgery methodology. This article highlights the latest market trends and modern-day advancements in the field, including the conventional and surgery first approach for orthognathic surgery. The use of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in VSP for orthognathic surgery was studied. The different software used for orthognathic surgical planning and the detailed protocol followed during the surgery, including the preoperative procedure were discussed along with utilisation of 3-dimension cone-beam computed tomography (3D CBCT) images for surgical planning. The implementation of VSP with CASS had significantly enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of orthognathic surgery for dentofacial deformity correction. The use of technology allowed improved preoperative planning, resulting in better outcomes for patients. The study of different software for orthognathic surgical planning and the protocol followed during surgery has provided valuable insight into the surgery. The continued advancement of technology in orthognathic surgery is promising for the field and for the patients.

Author Biographies

Hardeep Singh Tuli

Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana-Ambala, Haryana, India

Raunak Singh Chhabra

Tech Mahindra

Rashmi Rana

Department of Research, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Delhi-110060, India

References

Scerri M, Grech V. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Jun;145:105017. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105017.

Howard J. Artificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work. Am J Ind Med. 2019 Nov;62(11):917-26. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23037.

Yu KH, Beam AL, Kohane IS. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;2(10):719-31. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z.

Mohammad-Rahimi H, Nadimi M, Rohban MH, Shamsoddin E, Lee VY, Motamedian SR. Machine learning and orthodontics, current trends and the future opportunities: A scoping review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Aug;160(2):170-92.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.02.013.

Kaul V, Enslin S, Gross SA. History of artificial intelligence in medicine. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Oct;92(4):807-12. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.040.

Muthukrishnan N, Maleki F, Ovens K, Reinhold C, Forghani B, Forghani R. Brief history of artificial intelligence. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2020 Nov;30(4):393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2020.07.004.

Jandali D, Barrera JE. Recent advances in orthognathic surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Aug;28(4):246-50. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000638.

Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Jun 21;2(4):230-43. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000101.

Uribe FA, Farrell B. Surgery-first approach in the orthognathic patient. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Feb;32(1):89-103. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2019.08.009.

Zhou XY, Guo Y, Shen M, Yang GZ. Application of artificial intelligence in surgery. Front Med. 2020 Aug;14(4):417-30. doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0770-0.

Hamet P, Tremblay J. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism. 2017 Apr;69S:S36-S40. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.011.

Haas OL Jr, Becker OE, de Oliveira RB. Computer-aided planning in orthognathic surgery-systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Nov 25:S0901-5027(14)00430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.025.

Seo HJ, Choi YK. Current trends in orthognathic surgery. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2021 Dec;22(6):287-95. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2021.00598.

Van Hemelen G, Van Genechten M, Renier L, Desmedt M, Verbruggen E, Nadjmi N. Three-dimensional virtual planning in orthognathic surgery enhances the accuracy of soft tissue prediction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;43(6):918-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.04.006.

Naran S, Steinbacher DM, Taylor JA. Current concepts in orthognathic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jun;141(6):925e-36e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004438.

Ahmadvand A, Alavi S, Mehraban SH. An overview of surgery-first orthognathic approach: History, indications and limitations, protocols, and dentoskeletal stability. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Jun 22;18:47. PMID: 34429867.

Sharma VK, Yadav K, Tandon P. An overview of surgery-first approach: Recent advances in orthognathic surgery. J Orthod Sci. 2015 Jan-Mar;4(1):9-12. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.149609.

Peiró-Guijarro MA, Guijarro-Martínez R, Hernández-Alfaro F. Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Apr;149(4):448-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.022.

Liou EJ, Chen PH, Wang YC, Yu CC, Huang CS, Chen YR. Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: orthodontic guidelines and setup for model surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;69(3):771-80. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.011.

Borba AM, Borges AH, Cé PS, Venturi BA, Naclério-Homem MG, Miloro M. Mandible-first sequence in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;45(4):472-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.008.

Bouletreau P, Makaremi M, Ibrahim B, Louvrier A, Sigaux N. Artificial intelligence: applications in orthognathic surgery. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;120(4):347-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.06.001.

Gelesko S, Markiewicz MR, Weimer K, Bell RB. Computer-aided orthognathic surgery. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;20(1):107-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2012.01.002.

Ayoub A, Pulijala Y. The application of virtual reality and augmented reality in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. BMC Oral Health. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0937-8.

Vale F, Scherzberg J, Cavaleiro J, Sanz D, Caramelo F, Maló L, et al. 3D virtual planning in orthognathic surgery and CAD/CAM surgical splints generation in one patient with craniofacial microsomia: a case report. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jan-Feb;21(1):89-100. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.089-100.oar.

Otranto de Britto Teixeira A, Almeida MAO, Almeida RCDC, Maués CP, Pimentel T, Ribeiro DPB, et al. Three-dimensional accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Nov;158(5):674-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.09.023.

Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bergé SJ. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;40(4):341-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.013.

Pulijala Y, Ma M, Pears M, Peebles D, Ayoub A. An innovative virtual reality training tool for orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;47(9):1199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.01.005.

Farrell BB, Franco PB, Tucker MR. Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Nov;26(4):459-73. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2014.08.011.

Quevedo LA, Ruiz JV, Quevedo CA. Using a clinical protocol for orthognathic surgery and assessing a 3-dimensional virtual approach: current therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;69(3):623-37. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.009.

Stokbro K, Aagaard E, Torkov P, Bell RB, Thygesen T. Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Aug;43(8):957-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.011.

van Baar GJC, Forouzanfar T, Liberton NPTJ, Winters HAH, Leusink FKJ. Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2018 Sep;84:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.07.004.

Landaeta-Quinones CG, Hernandez N, Zarroug NK. Computer-assisted surgery: applications in dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 2018 Jul;62(3):403-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.03.009.

Zizelmann C, Hammer B, Gellrich NC, Schwestka-Polly R, Rana M, Bucher P. An evaluation of face-bow transfer for the planning of orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;70(8):1944-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.025.

Elnagar MH, Aronovich S, Kusnoto B. Digital workflow for combined orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Feb;32(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2019.08.004.

Knoops PGM, Borghi A, Breakey RWF, Ong J, Jeelani NUO, Bruun R, et al. Three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery: a clinical comparison of Dolphin, ProPlan CMF, and probabilistic finite element modelling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;48(4):511-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.10.008.

Soheilifar S, Soheilifar S, Afrasiabi Z, Soheilifar S, Tapak L, Naghdi N. Prediction accuracy of Dolphin software for soft-tissue profile in Class I patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. J World Fed Orthod. 2022 Feb;11(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.10.001.

Piombino P, Abbate V, Sani L, Troise S, Committeri U, Carraturo E, et al. Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery: two software platforms compared. Appl Sci. 2022 Sep 19;12(18):9364. doi: 10.3390/app12189364.

Thet PH, Kaboosaya B. Reproducibility of computerized cephalometric analysis software compared with conventional manual tracing for analyzing skeletal stability after orthognathic surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Dec;22(4):833-40. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-02071-7.

Lee KJC, Tan SL, Low HYA, Chen LJ, Yong CW, Chew MT. Accuracy of 3-dimensional soft tissue prediction for orthognathic surgery in a Chinese population. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;123(5):551-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.08.001.

Wu Y, Chen JM, Xie FP, Liu HH, Niu G, Lin LS. Simulation of postoperative occlusion and direction in autotransplantation of teeth: application of computer-aided design and digital surgical templates. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;57(7):638-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.05.011.

Lu C, Xie Q, He D, Yang C. Stability of orthognathic surgery in the treatment of condylar osteochondroma combined with jaw deformity by CT measurements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Aug;78(8):1417.e1-1417.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.025.

Chen K, Zhang Z, Jiang J, Wang J, Wang J, Sun Y, et al.. Prediction of condylar movement envelope surface based on facial morphology. Heliyon. 2023 Jul 7;9(7):e17769. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17769.

Zavattero E, Romano M, Gerbino G, Rossi DS, Giannì AB, Ramieri G, et al. evaluation of the accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a morphometric study. J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jun;30(4):1214-20. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005355.

Tran Duy TD, Jinnavanich S, Chen MC, Ko EW, Chen YR, Huang CS. Are signs of degenerative joint disease associated with chin deviation? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Aug;78(8):1403-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.019.

Stokbro K, Thygesen T. A 3-dimensional approach for analysis in orthognathic surgery-using free software for voxel-based alignment and semiautomatic measurement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;76(6):1316-26. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.11.010.

Magro-Filho O, Magro-Ernica N, Queiroz TP, Aranega AM, Garcia IR Jr. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.027.

Gimenez CM, Bertoz FA, Gabrielli MA, Magro Filho O, Garcia I, Pereira Filho VA. Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Sep-Oct;18(5):53-8. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000500010.

Xiao Z, Chen G, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Gu Y. Perceptual difference of smile aesthetics between 2-dimensional photographs and 3-dimensional dentofacial images: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Feb 16;23(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02798-2.

Zhang L, Liu Z, Li B, Yu H, Shen SG, Wang X. Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized fibular flap compared to conventional surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Feb;121(2):139-48. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.10.005.

Marchetti C, Bianchi A, Muyldermans L, Di Martino M, Lancellotti L, Sarti A. Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;40(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.09.004.

Karsli N, Yurdakul Z, Gonca M, Çava K. Does the traditional or digital dental model measurement method affect the results?: A validation study. EADS. 2023;50(2):87-94. doi: 10.52037/eads.2023.0021

Sürer E, Ünal M, Gül Aygün EB, Ucar Y. Evaluating the conversion degree of interim restorative materials produced by different 3-dimensional printer technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Oct;130(4):654.e1-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.001.

Trang NT, Ashikaga Y, Matsushita K, Ohiro Y. Investigating the relationship between the remodeling of TMJ bony structures and condylar rest position following orthognathic surgery in class II and class III skeletal malocclusions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2023 Jul 1;35(4):308–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoms.2022.12.003

Shujaat S, da Costa Senior O, Shaheen E, Politis C, Jacobs R. Visual and haptic perceptibility of 3D printed skeletal models in orthognathic surgery. J Dent. 2021 Jun;109:103660. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103660.

Baan F, Liebregts J, Xi T, Schreurs R, de Koning M, Bergé S, et al. A new 3D tool for assessing the accuracy of bimaxillary surgery: the OrthoGnathicAnalyser. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149625.

Baan F, Sabelis JF, Schreurs R, van de Steeg G, Xi T, van Riet TCT, et al. Validation of the OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0-3D accuracy assessment tool for bimaxillary surgery and genioplasty. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 26;16(1):e0246196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246196.

van Luijn R, Baan F, Shaheen E, Bergé S, Politis C, Maal T, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of condylar remodeling and skeletal relapse following LeFort-I osteotomy: A one-year follow-up bicenter study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Jan;50(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.09.021.

Rozeboom AVJ, Schreurs R, Helmer LML, Dubois L, Lobbezoo F, de Lange J. Volumetric outcomes of treatment for unilateral condylar fractures: A pilot study. Adv Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Mar;9:100399. doi: 10.1016/j.adoms.2023.100399.

Almadi D, Benington P, Ju X, Ayoub A. Reproducibility and reliability of digital occlusal planning for orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Oct;52(10):1074-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.03.001.

Lin CY, Hsung TC, Khambay B. Reducing cone beam CT scan height as a method of radiation reduction for photorealistic three-dimensional orthognathic planning. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;43(6):907-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.04.002.

Onică N, Onică CA, Tatarciuc M, Baciu ER, Vlasie GL, Ciofu M, et al. Managing predicted post-orthognathic surgical defects using combined digital software: a case report. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;11(9):1219. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091219.

Yılmaz ZÇ, Özel A, Sağlam R, Uçkan S. Comparison of scleral show alterations following Le Fort I osteotomy with either maxillary impaction or lengthening. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 May;49(5):347-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.031.

da Silva RJ, Valadares Souza CV, Souza GA, Ambrosano GMB, Freitas DQ, Sant'Ana E, et al. Changes in condylar volume and joint spaces after orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;47(4):511-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.10.012.

Tabchi Y, Zaoui F, Bahoum A. Accuracy of hard and soft tissue prediction using three-dimensional simulation software in bimaxillary osteotomies: A systematic review. Int Orthod. 2023 Dec;21(4):100802. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100802.

Ferraz FWDS, Iwaki-Filho L, Souza-Pinto GN, Iwaki LCV, Li AT, Cardoso MA. A comparative study of the accuracy between two computer-aided surgical simulation methods in virtual surgical planning. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb;49(2):84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.12.002.

Alkhayer A, Piffkó J, Lippold C, Segatto E. Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Head Face Med. 2020 Dec 4;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2.

Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR Jr, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005 Nov;34(6):369-75. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/17102411.

Motta ATS da, Carvalho F de AR, Oliveira AEF, Cevidanes LHS, Almeida MA de O. [Superposição automatizada de modelos tomográficos tridimensionais em cirurgia ortognática]. Dental Press J Orthod. 2010 Apr;15(2):39–41. Portuguese.

Popat H, Richmond S, Drage NA. New developments in: three-dimensional planning for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod. 2010 Mar;37(1):62-71. doi: 10.1179/14653121042885.

Wong A, Goonewardene MS, Allan BP, Mian AS, Rea A. Accuracy of maxillary repositioning surgery using CAD/CAM customized surgical guides and fixation plates. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Apr;50(4):494-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.08.009.

Ruggiero F, Borghi A, Bevini M, Badiali G, Lunari O, Dunaway D, et al. Soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery: Improving accuracy by means of anatomical details. PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0294640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294640.

Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Yuan P, Chen KC, Li J, et al. Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 1: planning sequence. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;44(12):1431-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.06.006.

Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Yuan P, Li J, Chen KC, et al. Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 2: three-dimensional cephalometry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;44(12):1441-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.06.007.

Naini FB, Gill DS. Challenges and opportunities facing contemporary orthognathic surgery. J Orthod. 2019 Jun;46(1_suppl):71-6. doi: 10.1177/1465312519840044.

Swennen GR, Mollemans W, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;67(10):2080-92. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.06.007.

Kau CH, Cronin A, Durning P, Zhurov AI, Sandham A, Richmond S. A new method for the 3D measurement of postoperative swelling following orthognathic surgery. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2006 Feb;9(1):31-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00341.

Kim YK. Complications associated with orthognathic surgery. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Feb;43(1):3-15. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.1.3.

Kakarala K, Shnayder Y, Tsue TT, Girod DA. Mandibular reconstruction. Oral Oncol. 2018 Feb;77:111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.020.

Published
2024/04/18
Issue
Vol. 55 No. 2 (2024): Mar-Apr
Section
Current topic
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).