Dental arch dimensions and palatal height in children with Turner syndrome

  • Cvetanka Bajraktarova Miševska Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
  • Mirjana Kočova Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Medical Faculty, Pediatric Clinic
  • Lidija Kanurkova Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
  • Gabriela Curcieva Cuckova Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
  • Marija Maneva Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
  • Emilija Bajraktarova Valjakova Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics

Abstract


Introduction: A complete or partial absence of an X chromosome in girls with Turner syndrome (TS) has an impact on dental archmorphology. The aim of this study was to analyze the sizes of dental arches as well as the height of the palatal vault in patients withTS, and to determine the influence of various karyotypes on the study variables.

Materials and methods: The study population sample consisted of 40 TS female patients, aged 9.2 to 18 years, and 40 healthy females aged 9.3 to 18 years, as the control group. The TS patients were subdivided according to karyotype (monosomy X, mosaic, andisochromosome). Dental arch width and length, and palatal height were measured directly on plaster dental casts.

Results: The results showed differences in the dental arch dimensions between TS and control groups. The maxillary dental arch was narrower and shorter, but the mandibular arch was shorter and of normal width in the TS group. The palate in TS patients were normal in height and did not differ from those of the control subjects. Although the dental arch dimensions and palatal height were slightly reduced in mosaic and isochromosome karyotypes compared with those in 45,X females, the investigation revealed nosignificant differences between the karyotypes.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the reduction of X chromosomal genetic material in Turner syndrome females results inthe reduction of dental arch dimensions, which is further reflected in the increased frequency of malocclusion in these individuals. Importantly, this study demonstrates that palatal height is normal, contrary to some reports in the literature. It is further significantthat the TS karyotype does not affect dentoalveolar morphology and palatal height.

References

Kočova M, Anastasovska V, Ilieva G, Šukarova Angelovska E. Cytogenetic findings in girls with Turner phenotype. 4th Balkan Meetings on Human Genetics, Novi Sad, Yugoslavia, Book of abstracts; 2001.p.17.

Elsheikh M, Dunger DB, Conway GS, Wass JA. Turner’s syndrome in adulthood. Endocr Rev. 2002;23(1):120-40.

Szilagyi A, Madlena M, Nagy G. The role of the paediatric dentist to initially diagnose and provide early treatment of Turner’s syndrome: a case report. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2000;1(4):185-90.

Jensen BL. Craniofacial morphology in Turner syndrome. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1985;5(4):327-40.

Peltomaki T, Alvesalo L, Isotupa K. Shape of the craniofacial complex in 45,X females: cephalometric study. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1989;9(4):331-8.

Midtbo M, Wisth JP, Halse A. Craniofacial morphology in young patients with Turner syndrome. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18(3):215-25.

Perkiomaki MR, Kyrkanides S, Niinimaa A, Alvesalo L. The relationship of distinct craniofacial features between Turner syndrome females and their parents. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(1):48-52.

Dumancic J, Kaic Z, Varga ML, Lauc T, Dumic M, Milosevic SA, et al. Characteristics of the craniofacial complex in Turner syndrome. Arch Oral Biol. 2010;55(1):81-8.

Rongen - Westerlaken C, vd Born E, Prahl-Andersen B, Rikken B, Teunenbroek V, Kamminga N, et al. Shape of the craniofacial complex in children with Turner syndrome. J Biol Buccale. 1992;20(4):185-90.

Alvesalo L, Tammisalo E. Enamel thickness in 45,X females’ permanent teeth. Am J Hum Genet. 1981;33(3):464-9.

Laine T, Alvesalo L, Savolainen A, Lammi S. Occlusal morphology in 45,X females. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1986;6(4):351-5.

Varrela J, Townsend G, Alvesalo L. Tooth crown size in human females with 45,X/46,XX chromosomes. Arch Oral Biol. 1988;33(5):291-4.

Mayhall JT, Alvesalo L, Townsend GC. Tooth crown size in 46, X, i (Xq) human females. Arch Oral Biol. 1991;36(6):411-4.

Midtbo M, Halse A. Tooth crown size and morphology in Turner syndrome. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994;52(1):7-19.

Szilagyi A, Keszthelyi G, Madlena M, Nagy G. Morphologic alterations of tooth crown in patients with Turner syndrome and its association with orthodontic anomalies. Fogorv Sz. 2000;93(9):268- 76. Hungarian.

Rizell S, Barrenas ML, Andlin - Sobocki A, Stecksen - Blicks C, Kjellberg H. Turner syndrome isochromosome karyotype correlates with decreased dental crown width. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(2):213-8.

Harju M, Laine T, Alvesalo L. Occlusal anomalies in 45,X/46,XXand 46,Xi(Xq)-women (Turner syndrome). Scand J Dent Res. 1989;97(5):387-91.

Midtbo M, Halse A. Occlusal morphology in Turner syndrome. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18(2):103-9.

Poje Z, Škrinjarić I, Kaić Z, Štefanac-Papić J. Prevalence of malocclusions in patients with gonadal dysgenesis. Coll Antropol. 1996;20(1):201-6.

Ogiuchi H, Takano K, Tanaka M, Hizuka N, Takagi S, Sangu Y, et al. Oro - maxillofacial development in patients with Turner’s syndrome. Endocrinol Jpn. 1985;32(6):881-90.

Rizell S, Barrenas ML, Andlin-Sobocki A, Stecksen - Blicks C, Kjellberg H. Palatal height and dental arch dimensions in Turner syndrome karyotypes. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(6):841-7.

Gorlin RJ. Chromosomal abnormalities and oral anomalies. J Dent Res. 1963;42: Suppl 1297-306.

Johnson R, Baghdady VS. Maximum palatal height in patients with Turner’s syndrome. J Dent Res. 1969;48(3):473-6.

Lopez ME, Bazan C, Lorca IA, Chervonagura A. Oral and clinical characteristics of a group of patients with Turner syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94(2):196-204.

Woodworth DA, Sinclair PM, Alexander RG. Bilateral congenital absence of maxillary lateral incisors: a craniofacial and dental cast analysis. Am J Orthod. 1985;87(4):280-93.

Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen and Unwin; 1940.

Minitab Inc. MINITAB Reference Manual PC Version Release 8. Rosemont (PA):Minitab; 1991.

Laine T, Alvesalo L. Size of the alveolar arch of the mandible in relation to that of the maxilla in 45,X females. J Dent Res. 1986;65(12):1432-4.

Perkiomaki MR, Alvesalo L. Palatine ridges and tongue position in Turner syndrome subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30(2):163-8.

Laine T, Alvesalo L, Lammi S. Palatal dimensions in 45,X-females. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1985;5(3):239-46.

Pospieszyńska M, Korman E. Abnormalities of the masticatory organ in Turner syndrome. Endokrynol Diabetol Chor Przemiany Materii Wieku Rozw. 1998;4(1):39-43. Polish.

Clement - Jones M, Schiller S, Rao E, Blaschke RJ, Zuniga A, Zeller R, et al. The short stature homeobox gene SHOX is involved in skeletal abnormalities in Turner syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(5):695-702.

Laine T, Alvesalo L. Palatal and mandibular arch morphology in 47,XYY men and in other sex - chromosome anomalies. Arch Oral Biol. 1993;38(2):101-5.

Laine T, Alvesalo L. Palatal and alveolar arch dimensions in 47,XXY (Klinefelter syndrome) men. Hum Biol. 1993;65(1):131-8.

Published
2017/10/04
Section
Original Scientific Papers