Assessment of the third finger middle phalanx maturation stages: A study of repeatability and diagnostic agreement

Giuseppe Perinetti; Simona  Tecco; Jasmina  Primozic

doi:10.5937/sejodr8-34600

Giuseppe Perinetti University of Trieste
Simona Tecco Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
Jasmina Primozic Department of Orthodontics and Jaw Orthopaedics, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr8-34600

Keywords: orthodontics, middle phalanx maturation, diagnosis, accuracy, repeatability

Abstract

Data regarding the repeatability of the third finger middle phalanx maturation (MPM) method is still lacking. This study evaluated both the repeatability and diagnostic accuracy of the visual assessment of the MPM stages. Ten operators were given detailed instructions of the 5-stage MPM method and were asked to stage 80 cases, which included radiographs of equal number of all 5 MPM stages. Radiographs of the third finger were created by cropping hand-wrist radiographs of the Burlington Growth Study, ensuring the inclusion of several borderline cases. Such assessment was repeated in two sessions (T1 and T2) 4 weeks apart. For both the sessions, overall agreement and kappa coefficients were above 80% and 0.86, respectively. Most of the disagreements were seen for stages 1 and 2 with overall mean scores between the sessions being 29.7% and 39.4%, respectively. With only 4 exceptions (out of over 1,600 recordings), 1-stage apart disagreements were seen. Overall diagnostic accuracy ranged from 83.7% for MPM stage 2 (T1) to 99.3% for MPM stage 5 (T1). The MPM method has a satisfactorily level of repeatability and diagnostic agreement. About 1 case out of 5 remains misclassified, disagreement is mostly limited to 1-stage apart, with stage 2 being the most critical.

References

1. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA, Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 2005;11:119-29.
2. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Lavergne J. Mechanism of craniofacial growth and modus operandi of functional appliances: a cell-level and cybernetic approach to orthodontic decision making. In: Carlson DS, editor. Craniofacial growth theory and orthodontic treatment. Monograph 23. Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan; 1990. p. 13-74.
3. Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982;52:88-112.
4. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd edition ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1959.
5. Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:58-66.
6. Perinetti G, Baccetti T, Contardo L, Di Lenarda R. Gingival crevicular fluid alkaline phosphatase activity as a non-invasive biomarker of skeletal maturation. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14:44-50.
7. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA, Jr. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:316-23.
8. Perinetti G, Primozic J, Sharma B, Cioffi I, Contardo L. Cervical vertebral maturation method and mandibular growth peak: a longitudinal study of diagnostic reliability. Eur J Orthod. 2018;40:666-72.
9. Perinetti G, Bianchet A, Franchi L, Contardo L. Cervical vertebral maturation: An objective and transparent code staging system applied to a 6-year longitudinal investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151:898-906.
10. Ball G, Woodside D, Tompson B, Hunter WS, Posluns J. Relationship between cervical vertebral maturation and mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:e455-61.
11. Perinetti G, Braga C, Contardo L, Primozic J. Cervical vertebral maturation: Are postpubertal stages attained in all subjects? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157:305-12.
12. Perinetti G, Contardo L. Reliability of growth indicators and efficiency of functional treatment for skeletal Class II malocclusion: Current evidence and controversies. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1367691.
13. Perinetti G, Sbardella V, Contardo L. Diagnostic reliability of the third finger middle phalanx maturation (MPM) method in the identification of the mandibular growth peak. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39:194-201.
14. Perinetti G. The third finger middle phalanx maturation (MPM) method to assess timing of functional treatment for skeletal class II malocclusion: Report of three cases. Case Rep Dent. 2019;2019:8382612.
15. De Stefani A, Bruno G, Siviero L, Crivellin G, Mazzoleni S, Gracco A. Middle phalanx maturation of the third finger (MPM) method in the evaluation of skeletal age in a growing orthodontic patient. Int Orthod. 2018;16:499-513.
16. Brenner H, Kliebsch U. Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories. Epidemiology. 1996;7:199-202.
17. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74.
18. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. Papers that report diagnostic or screening tests. BMJ. 1997;315:540-3.
19. Nestman TS, Marshall SD, Qian F, Holton N, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Cervical vertebrae maturation method morphologic criteria: Poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:182-8.
20. Perinetti G, Caprioglio A, Contardo L. Visual assessment of the cervical vertebral maturation stages: A study of diagnostic accuracy and repeatability. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:951-6.
21. Gabriel DB, Southard KA, Qian F, Marshall SD, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Cervical vertebrae maturation method: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:478 e1-7.
22. Rongo R, Valleta R, Bucci R, Bonetti GA, Michelotti A, D'Anto V. Does clinical experience affect the reproducibility of cervical vertebrae maturation method? Angle Orthod. 2015;85:841-7.
23. Perinetti G, Primozic J, Franchi L, Contardo L. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in pre-pubertal and pubertal Class II patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies. PLoS One. 2015;10:1-35 e0141198.
24. Houston WJ. Relationships between skeletal maturity estimated from hand-wrist radiographs and the timing of the adolescent growth spurt. Eur J Orthod. 1980;2:81-93.