Defining second-tier audit firms in Serbia: In search of the Small four
Abstract
In this paper, we aim to define the so-called "second tier" audit firms in the Republic of Serbia. In order to accomplish that, we have analyzed 10,555 financial statements of legal entities operating on the territory of the Republic of Serbia for the period 2010-2012. The "Big 4" audit firms have audited 1,101 of the aforementioned financial statements, whereas the rest of the statements have been audited by the remaining 38 audit firms. For the purpose of training a decision tree classification algorithm, a number of calculated financial indicators of audited entities and corresponding audit opinions issued by the "Big 4" firms have been treated as independent and dependent variables, respectively. The resulting set of rules was then applied to the rest of the sample. Based on the observed level of compliance with the "Big 4" criteria (which stands for high quality audit), we have subsequently suggested the "Small 4" audit firms in Serbia. Moreover, the results show that the "Big 4" firms and the other audit firms assign different importance to independent variables. The paper also discusses possible reasons for that and offers recommendations for future research.
References
Becker, C., Defond, M., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x.
Campa, D. (2013). Big 4 fee premium and audit quality: Latest evidence from UK listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(8), 680-707. doi:10.1108/MAJ-11-2012-0784.
Causse, D., & Vu, V.H.T. (2012). Les dimensions de la performance des cabinets d’audit légal - Le point de vue des auditeurs. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, 28(18), 97-143. doi:10.3917/cca.183.0097.
Deangelo, L. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(1), 183-199.
Defond, M. (1992). The association between changes in client firm agency costs and auditor switching. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 11(1), 16-31.
Dey, M., & Robin, A. (2011). Second-tier auditing firms: Developments and prospects. The CPA Journal, 81(6), 32-39.
Geiger, M., & Rama, D. (2006). Audit firm size and going-concern reporting accuracy. Accounting Horizons, 20(1), 1-17. doi: 10.2308/acch.2006.20.1.1.
Geiger, M., Raghunandan, K., & Riccardi, W. (2014). The global financial crisis: U. S. bankruptcies and going-concern audit opinions. Accounting Horizons, 28(1), 59-75. doi:10.2308/acch-50659.
Hogan, C., & Martin, R. (2009). Risk shifts in the market for audits: An examination of changes in risk for "second tier" audit firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 93-118.
Jakšić, D., Mijić, K., & Andrić, M. (2012). Analysis of variations in the performance of audit firms in the Republic of Serbia. Economic Annals, 57(193), 71-91. doi:10.2298/EKA1293071J.
Palmrose, V. (1988). An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review, 63(1), 55-73.
Radak, I., & Bukvić, L. (2010). Javna preduzeća beže od stroge revizije. Retrieved September 14, 2014, from http://www.danas.rs/danasrs/ekonomija/javna_preduzeca_beze_od_stroge_revizije.4.html?news_id=188710
Ritschard, G. (2010). CHAID and Earlier Supervised Tree Methods. Retreived September 14, 2014, from http://ideas.repec.org/p/gen/geneem/2010.02.html
Tsipouridou, M., & Spathis, C. (2012). Earnings management and the role of auditors in an unusual IFRS context: The case of Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 21(1), 62-78. doi:10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2012.01.005
Yaşar, A. (2013). Big Four auditors’ audit quality and earnings management: Evidence from Turkish Stock Market. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(17), 153-163.
