PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH-RISK CARDIOVASCULAR PATIENTS IN ABDOMINAL SURGERY
Abstract
Introduction: The preparation of cardiovascular patients for different types of surgical interventions represents a challenge in an anesthesiologist’s everyday practice. Its complexity depends on the severity of the underlying disease, the effects of the drug treatment, urgency, and the type of surgical intervention. Different types of scoring systems are available when it comes to the assessment of cardiovascular risk in patients during surgery. One of them, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI/Lee criteria), stands out due to its comprehensiveness and simplicity, and is thus applied most frequently. Using the example of two patients with cardiovascular disease, the aim of this paper is to show how the risk of perioperative complications can be reduced by applying a multidisciplinary approach, along with an individualized strategy and modern guidelines.
Case reports: In the first case, we presented a patient with acute appendicitis. Because of angina pectoris, one month prior to the planned abdominal surgery, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention was performed placing one stent, after which dual antiplatelet drugs were prescribed.
A patient with acute cholecystitis is presented in the second case. Coronary artery bypass grafting is planned within a month upon the abdominal surgery, due to a severe form of ischemic cardiomyopathy. Both patients are at high risk of myocardial damage during surgery, the first patient being at high risk of hemorrhage as well.
Conclusion: The appropriate balance in the perioperative care of such patients can be achieved by a multidisciplinary approach, as well as by adapting modern guidelines to patients’ individual needs.
References
Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G, Lipsitz SR, Esquivel MM, Uribe-Leitz T, et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet. 2015 Apr 27;385 Suppl 2:S11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60806-6.
Halvorsen S, Mehilli J, Cassese S, Hall TS, Abdelhamid M, Barbato E, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 14;43(39):3826-924. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270.
Roshanov PS, Walsh M, Devereaux PJ, MacNeil SD, Lam NN, Hildebrand AM, et al. External validation of the Revised Cardiac Risk Index and update of its renal variable to predict 30-day risk of major cardiac complications after non-cardiac surgery: rationale and plan for analyses of the VISION study. BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 9;7(1):e013510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013510.
De Hert S, Staender S, Fritsch G, Hinkelbein J, Afshari A, Bettelli G, et al. Pre-operative evaluation of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: Updated guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jun;35(6):407-65. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000817.
Ruetzler K, Smilowitz NR, Berger JS, Devereaux PJ, Maron BA, Newby LK, et al. Diagnosis and management of patients with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021 Nov 9;144(19):e287-e305. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001024.
Ellenberger C, Schorer R, Diaper J, Jeleff A, Luise S, Hagermann A, et al. Myocardial injury after major noncardiac surgery: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2022 Jun;171(6):1626-34. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.029.
Devereaux PJ, Biccard BM, Sigamani A, Xavier D, Chan MTV, Srinathan SK, et al; Writing Committee for the VISION Study Investigators. Association of postoperative high-sensitivity troponin levels with myocardial injury and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 2017 Apr 25;317(16):1642-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.4360.
Atkinson TM, Giraud GD, Togioka BM, Jones DB, Cigarroa JE. Cardiovascular and ventilatory consequences of laparoscopic surgery. Circulation. 2017 Feb 14;135(7):700-10. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023262.
