INFLUENCE OF PREVIOUS MOTOR EXPERIENCE ON ATTITUDES ABOUT SERVICE-LEARNING AMONG STUDENTS

  • Đurđica Miletić Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, Croatia
  • Ivana Jadrić University of Split, Croatia
  • Alen Miletić Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, Croatia
Keywords: SELEB scale, Sustainable Development Goals, physical activities

Abstract


Service-Learning (SL) as a growing innovative pedagogical model, has recently become more popular in higher education area dedicated to physical activity. Since physical education (PE) students are oriented toward society, it is extremely important for them to develop a sense of connection and responsibility toward society during their studies. This research was carried out on a sample of 58 students of a PE study program, aged between 20 and 22. The first step of the research was to determine six different groups of students using the poly-structured interview about their previous motor experience while considering the type of activity, the length of time engaged in a certain activity and the level of motor skills. Six investigated groups were formed according to their dominant previous motor activity: artistic and aesthetic activities, society-oriented recreational activities, self-directed recreational activities, team sports, individual sports, and martial arts. In order to determine the students’ perception of SL Benefits, the SELEB questionnaire was used. The original 27 items generated for the SELEB scale that measure the benefit categories were divided into six categories: civic responsibility, interpersonal skills, leadership ability, ability to apply knowledge, general life skills and critical thinking. One-way Analysis of Variance was used to analyse the differences in investigated groups defined by previous motor experience on SL attitudes among students. The results showed significant differences between groups in SL experience (F5,52 = 3,19; p=0,014). The highest value on the SELEB scale was recorded in the group with dominant artistic and aesthetic activities, and the lowest value on the SELEB scale was recorded in a group with dominant previous experience in individual sports. Significant differences were determined with the post-hoc Tukey HSD test between groups with minimal previous experience in individual sports and groups with dominant previous experience in society-oriented recreational activities, team sports, and artistic/aesthetic activities.    

References

1.     Flinders, B. A. (2013). Service-Learning Pedagogy: Benefits Of A Learning Community Approach. Journal of College Teaching & Learning –Third Quarter 2013, 10(3), 159-166.

2.     Francisco-Garcés, X., Salvador-Garcia, C., Maravé-Vivas, M., Chiva-Bartoll, O., & Santos-Pastor, M. L. (2022). Research on Service-Learning in Physical Activity and Sport: Where We Have Been, Where We Are, Where We Are Going. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(11), 6362.

3.     Hébert, A., & Hauf, P. (2015). Student learning through service learning: Effects on academic development, civic responsibility, interpersonal skills and practical skills. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(1), 37–49.

4.     Herold, F., & Waring, M. (2018). An investigation of pre-service teachers’ learning in physical education teacher education: Schools and university in partnership. Sport, Education and Society23(1), 95-107.

5.     Jadrić, I., Bilić, I., & Miletić, Đ. (2022). Institutionalisation of the service-learning as a tool in higher education image building. Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific and Professional Conference on Service-Learning “COMMUNITY-ENGAGED UNIVERSITY”, May 20, 2022, Split, Croatia.

6.     Larsen, M. A. (2017). International service-learning: Rethinking the role of emotions. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(3), 279–94.

7.     Marco-Gardoqui, M., Eizaguirre, A., & García-Feijoo, M. (2020). The impact of service-learning methodology on business schools’ students worldwide: A systematic literature review. PLoS ONE, 15(12).

8.     McGorry, S. Y. (2012). No significant difference in service learning online. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks16(4), 45-54.

9.     Pazos, P., Cima, F., Kidd, J., Ringleb, S., Ayala, O., Gutierrez, K., & Kaipa, K. (2020). Enhancing Teamwork Skills Through an Engineering Service-learning Collaboration. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online.

10.  Prentice, M., Garcia, R. M. (2000). Service learning: the next generation in education. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 24(1), 19–26.

11.  Toncar, M. F., Reid, J. S., Burns, D. J., Anderson, C. E., & Nguyen, H. P. (2006). Uniform assessment of the benefits of service learning: The development, evaluation, and implementation of the SELEB scale. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice14(3), 223-238.

12.  Warren, J. L. (2012). Does service-learning increase student learning? A meta-analysis. Michigan journal of community service learning18(2), 56-61.

Published
2023/10/06
How to Cite
Miletić, Đurđica, Jadrić, I., & Miletić, A. (2023). INFLUENCE OF PREVIOUS MOTOR EXPERIENCE ON ATTITUDES ABOUT SERVICE-LEARNING AMONG STUDENTS . Sport - Nauka I Praksa, 13(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.5937/snp13-1-44821
Section
Original scientific paper