Efekti društvenog konteksta pandemije COVID-19 na obrazovne politike
Sažetak
Društveni kontekst je jedan od determinišućih faktora u kreiranju obrazovnih politika i, posebno, kurikuluma. Svrha rada je da razmotri prilagođavanje matematičkog kurikuluma aktuelnom kontekstu pandemije. Polazeći od istorijskog razvoja matematičkog kurikuluma u Srbiji i pretpostavke da su uslovi u društvu uslovili promenu kurikuluma, hipotetičko deduktivnom metodom evidentiranjem i komparacijom iskustava konstatovane su i diskutovane karakteristike procesa planiranja, organizovanja i realizacije nastave matematike u pandemiji. Diskutuje se o načinu na koji su društveni kontekst i društvene institucije uticali na razlike između planiranog i implementiranog matematičkog kurikuluma. Zaključeno je da je kurikulum preusmeren ka modernističkom pristupu uz oslonac na informacionim tehnologijama.
Reference
Banđur, V. (1985). A student in the teaching process. Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša. [In Serbian]
Banđur, V. (1991). Modern teaching theory, Naša škola, br. 3–4, 113–122, Banja Luka. [In Serbian]
Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Sun, X., & Ramploud, A. (2014). A dialogue between cultures about task design for primary school. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 22, str. 549–558. Retrieved 1.12.2020. from http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00834054.
Bognar, L., Matijević, M. (2002). Didactics. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. [In Croatian]
Đorđević, J. (2003). Perceptions of the curriculum and its role in teaching, Pedagoška stvarnost (1–2), 31–45. [In Serbian]
Gundem, B. (1998). Understanding Europian Didactics – an overview. Oslo: Institute for Educational Research
Jablonka, E. (2003). Math Literacy. In A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel-Kreidt, J. Kilpatrick & F. K-S. Leung (Eds.) Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education, (75–102). Springer.
Kaličanin, M. (1997). Planning and programming in education. Beograd: Agena. [In Serbian]
Kvaščev, R. (1977). Application of learning theory in the field of teaching and education. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Privredno-finansijski vodič. [In Serbian]
Klafki, W., Schulz, W., von Cube, F., Möller, C., Winkel, R., Blankertz, H. (1994). Didactic theories. Zagreb: Educa. [In Croatian]
Liotar, F. (1988). The postmodern state. Novi Sad: Bratstvo i jedinstvo. [In Serbian]
Milinković, J. (2018). Historical Aspects of Math Curriculum Rebuilding. Sh. Yoshinori & R.Vithal (ed.). School Mathematics Curriculum reforms: Challenges, Changes and Opportunities, Proceedings of the The ICMI Study 24 Study Conference (141–148), Tscukuba, Japan, 26–30. 11. 2018.
Milinković, J. (2015). From contemporary to conceivable mathematics education. In J. Radisic & N. Budjevac (Eds.) Secondary analysis of research findings in light of new eduction policy (106–117). Belgrade: The Society of educational researchers
Milinković, J. (2016). Essays on learning and teaching mathematics. Beograd: Učiteljski fakultet. [In Serbian]
Milinković, J., Jablanović Marušić, M., & Dabić Boričić, M. (2017). Student achievement in mathematics: main findings, trends and curriculum. In M. Jablanovic Marusic, et al. (Eds). TIMSS 2015 in Serbia: results of the international research of student achievement of the 4th grade of primary school in mathematics and natural sciences (27–50). Beograd: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja. Available at: http://www.mpn.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/TIMSS-2015-Publikacija.pdf [In Serbian]
Milić, V. (1978). Sociološki metod. Beograd: Nolit.
Miljević, M. (2007). Methodology of scientific work. Pale: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Istočnom Sarajevu. [In Serbian]
Palekčić, M. (2007). From curriculum to educational standards. In V. Previšić (ed.) Curriculum, Theories, Methodology, Content, Structure, (35–101). Zagreb: Školska knjiga. [In Croatian]
Poljak, V. (1984). Didactic Innovations and Pedagogical Reform of the School. Zagreb: Školske novine. [In Serbian]
Posh, P., Larcher, D. & Altricher, H. (1996). Curriculum/Lehrplan. Retrieved from http://plaz.uni-paderborn.de/Service/PLAN/plan.php?id=0003.
Teaching and learning program for the third grade of primary education and upbringing. (2019). Retriеved on 1. 12. 2020. from www.mpn.gov.rs › uploads › 2019/06 › PrilogIII-razred. [In Serbian]
Ristić, M., Mandić, M. (2018). Readiness of the education system for mobile learning. Sociološki pregled, LII (3), 1044–1071. doi: 10.5937/socpreg52-18707
Smith, M. K. (2000). Curriculum and practice. The encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved from www.infed.org/biblio/b-curric.htm
Sriraman, B. & English, L. (Eds) (2010). Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking new frontiers. Haidelberg: Springer.
Stanic, G. A. & Kilpatrick, J. (2004). Mathematics curriculum reforming the United States: a historical perspective. Educ. Mat. Pesqui, 6(2), 11–27. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/emp/article/viewFile/4686/3255.
Tayler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Tsekeris, C., Zeri, P., (2020). The Coronavirus Crisis as a World-historic Event in the Digital Era. Sociološki pregled LIV (3), 498–517. doi: 10.5937/socpreg54-27687
Vican D., Bognar, L. & Previšić, V. (2007). Croatian national curriculum. In V. Previšić (ed.) Curriculum, Theories, Methodology, Content, Structure(157–204). Zagreb: Školska knjiga. [In Croatian]
Vilotijević, M. (1997). Modern teaching theory. Beograd: Učiteljski fakultet. [In Serbian]
Vilotijević, M. (2000). Didactics – Organization of Teaching. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, Učiteljski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. [In Serbian]
Vilotijević, M. (2000). Didactics – The Subject of Didactics. Beograd: Naučna knjiga/Učiteljski fakultet. [In Serbian]
Vuletić, M. (2020). From the Editor: Thematic issue Society and COVID-19. Sociološki pregled LIV (3), 433–444. doi: 10.5937/socpreg54-28536