Circulus vitiosus of the sex / gender dichotomy: feminist polemics with trans activism

  • Ana S. Vuković Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade (Serbia)
Keywords: sex, gender, feminism, ideological struggle, political movement, social divisions

Abstract


The paper deals with the analysis of feminists’ arguments about the sex/gender dichotomy within the relationship to trans activism. In the first part of the paper, we will give the usual definitions of sex and gender in feminist literature and the views of feminists on trans activism. Next, we will explain which trans activists’ views feminists disagree with, and how language is used for ideological purposes. The aim of this paper is to identify the basic dilemmas and bioengineering associated with the underestimation of biological sex, that is, with the opinion of trans activists that men who are trans women are also women. The author will explain why feminists believe that this approach to the sex/ gender dichotomy is a threat to women’s rights in the society.

References

Bourdieu, P. (1999). The Outline of a Theory of Practice: three studies on Kabyle ethnology. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. [In Serbian]

Bourdieu, P. (2001). The Rule of Man. Podgorica: CID. [In Serbian]

Debate: Does trans activism negatively impact women’s rights? March 22, 2019. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yawM1CRWxE

Debunking Myths about “Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminism” (“TERF”), October 10, 2016. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UafsVsUYTjI

Fighting the New Misogyny: A Feminist Critique of Gender Identity. February 6, 2020. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voaYjKMw5rI

Germaine Greer on Аnti-feminists, Тransgender and how Equality feminism is not enough, December 1, 2015. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1WFOoOGKaU

Greer, G. (1970). The Female Eunuch. UK: MacGibbon & Kee

Lerner, G. (1986). The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Milić, A. (2001). Sociology of the Family. Criticism and Challenges. Beograd: Čigoja štampa. [In Serbian]

Milić, А. (1998). Patriarchal Оrder, Revolution and Knowledge about the Position of Women in Serbia. In L. Perović (editor-in-chief) Serbia in the 19th and 20th century modernizing processes. 2. Women’s position as the measure of modernization. Beograd: Institut za noviju istoriiju Srbije. [In Serbian]

Ortner, Sh. (1983). Is Female to Male as Nature is to Culture?. In Ž. Papić, L. Sklevicky (eds.)

Anthropology of Women (152–183). Beograd: Prosveta [In Serbian]

Papić, Ž. (1989). Sociology and Feminism. Beograd: Istraživačko-izdavački centar SSO Srbije. [In Serbian]

Papić, Ž. (1997). Sexuality and Culture: body and knowledge in social anthropology. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek. [In Serbian]

Raymond G. Janice (1994). The Transsexual Empire: the making of the she-male. New York: Teachers College Press.

Schmale, W. (2011). A History of Masculinity in Europe (1450–2000). Beograd: Clio. [In Serbian]

Šobot, A. (2014). Gender Inequality in Serbia: a demographic viewpoint. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka. [In Serbian]

Trans Activists Shut Down Speech, Disrupt Moment of Silence for LG Orlando Victims, 17 June 2016. Available at:

Vuković, А. (2012). One Point of View on the Implicit Forms of Subordination as a Manifestation of Symbolic Power with Examples from Everyday Life. In M. Rašević,

M. Marković (eds) We Will Push the Boundaries (215–226) Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka. Available at https://www.idn.org.rs/biblioteka/Pomeracemo_granice.pdf [In Serbian]

Vuković, А. (2013). The Question of Women’s Political Identity in Serbia and United States – one Comparison. Sociološki pregled 47 (2), 249–270. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg1302249V [In Serbian]

Vujaklija, M. (1970). Lexicon of Foreign Words and Expressions. Beograd: Prosveta. [In Serbian]

Published
2021/10/25
Section
Original scientific paper