Circulus vitiosus dihotomije pol / rod: feministička polemika sa trans aktivizmom

  • Ana S. Vuković Institut društvenih nauka, Beograd (Srbija)
Ključne reči: pol, rod, feminizam, ideološka borba, politički pokret, društveni rascepi

Sažetak


Rad se bavi analizom argumentacije feministkinja o dihotomiji pol/rod u sklopu odnosa prema trans aktivizmu. U prvom delu rada daćemo uobičajena određenja pola i roda u feminističkoj literaturi i stanovišta feministkinja o trans aktivizmu. Objasnićemo s kojim stavovima trans aktivista se feministkinje ne slažu i na koji način se jezik koristi u ideološke svrhe. Cilj rada je da se uoče osnovne dileme povezane s nipodaštavanjem biološkog pola, to jest sa mišljenjem trans aktivista da su muškarci – trans žene, takođe žene. Autor objašnjava zbog čega feministkinje smatraju da je ovakav pristup dihotomiji pol/rod ugrožavanje ženskih prava u društvu.

Reference

Bourdieu, P. (1999). The Outline of a Theory of Practice: three studies on Kabyle ethnology. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. [In Serbian]

Bourdieu, P. (2001). The Rule of Man. Podgorica: CID. [In Serbian]

Debate: Does trans activism negatively impact women’s rights? March 22, 2019. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yawM1CRWxE

Debunking Myths about “Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminism” (“TERF”), October 10, 2016. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UafsVsUYTjI

Fighting the New Misogyny: A Feminist Critique of Gender Identity. February 6, 2020. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voaYjKMw5rI

Germaine Greer on Аnti-feminists, Тransgender and how Equality feminism is not enough, December 1, 2015. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1WFOoOGKaU

Greer, G. (1970). The Female Eunuch. UK: MacGibbon & Kee

Lerner, G. (1986). The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Milić, A. (2001). Sociology of the Family. Criticism and Challenges. Beograd: Čigoja štampa. [In Serbian]

Milić, А. (1998). Patriarchal Оrder, Revolution and Knowledge about the Position of Women in Serbia. In L. Perović (editor-in-chief) Serbia in the 19th and 20th century modernizing processes. 2. Women’s position as the measure of modernization. Beograd: Institut za noviju istoriiju Srbije. [In Serbian]

Ortner, Sh. (1983). Is Female to Male as Nature is to Culture?. In Ž. Papić, L. Sklevicky (eds.)

Anthropology of Women (152–183). Beograd: Prosveta [In Serbian]

Papić, Ž. (1989). Sociology and Feminism. Beograd: Istraživačko-izdavački centar SSO Srbije. [In Serbian]

Papić, Ž. (1997). Sexuality and Culture: body and knowledge in social anthropology. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek. [In Serbian]

Raymond G. Janice (1994). The Transsexual Empire: the making of the she-male. New York: Teachers College Press.

Schmale, W. (2011). A History of Masculinity in Europe (1450–2000). Beograd: Clio. [In Serbian]

Šobot, A. (2014). Gender Inequality in Serbia: a demographic viewpoint. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka. [In Serbian]

Trans Activists Shut Down Speech, Disrupt Moment of Silence for LG Orlando Victims, 17 June 2016. Available at:

Vuković, А. (2012). One Point of View on the Implicit Forms of Subordination as a Manifestation of Symbolic Power with Examples from Everyday Life. In M. Rašević,

M. Marković (eds) We Will Push the Boundaries (215–226) Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka. Available at https://www.idn.org.rs/biblioteka/Pomeracemo_granice.pdf [In Serbian]

Vuković, А. (2013). The Question of Women’s Political Identity in Serbia and United States – one Comparison. Sociološki pregled 47 (2), 249–270. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg1302249V [In Serbian]

Vujaklija, M. (1970). Lexicon of Foreign Words and Expressions. Beograd: Prosveta. [In Serbian]

Objavljeno
2021/10/25
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Originalni naučni rad