Škola kao vaspitni kontekst za razvoj socijalne kompetencije učenika

  • Mirsada S. Zukorlić Univerzitet u Beogradu, Učiteljski fakultet, Nastavno odeljenje u Novom Pazaru, Novi Pazar (Srbija)
  • Ivko A. Nikolić Univerzitet u Beogradu, Učiteljski fakultet, Beograd (Srbija)
Ključne reči: školska sredina, socijalna kompetencija učenika, socijalni konstruktivizam

Sažetak


U radu se metodom teorijske analize razmatraju mogućnosti razvoja socijalne kompetencije učenika u školi. Od škole se očekuje da svoj način rada sa učenicima prilagodi novim potrebama, kako bi se iz niza individualnih i socijalnih sposobnosti razvili pojedini segmenti kao kapacitet za socijalnu uspešnost – socijalna kompetentnost. Škola svojom vaspitnom misijom, u okviru koje je uloga nastavnika ključna, podstiče socijalne kompetencije kroz: sticanje i proširivanje socijalnih znanja učenika i razumevanje socijalne stvarnosti; skretanje pažnje učenika na tuđa osećanja i interese; podsticanje alternativnih interpretacija tuđeg ponašanja; pružanje pomoći učenicima u aktivnom učestvovanju u raspravama; pružanje pomoći učenicima u otkrivanju zajedničkih obeležja; potkrepljivanje komunikacije između učenika (negovanje verbalne i neverbalne komunikacije); podsticanje konstruktivne saradnje među učenicima; jačanje empatije i jačanje altruizma.

Reference

Avramović, Z. (1999). Textbook-culture-society. Beograd: Učiteljski fakultet. [In Serbian]
Bakoč, A. Kaljača, S. (2019). Quality of social competence of students with mild intellectual disability in school environment. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija Vol. 18 (1), 9–41. DOI: 10.5937/specedreh18-17588 [In Serbian]
Cefai, C., Bartolo P. A., Cavioni, V. & Downes, P. (2018). Strengthening Social and Emotional Education as a core curricular area across the EU. A review of the international evidence, NESET II report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2766/664439
Davis, B. & D. Sumara (2002): Constructivist Discourses and the Field of Education: Problems and Possibilities. Educational Theory, Vol. 52, No. 4, 409–428.
Delors, J. (1996). Education a hidden treasure, UNESCO: Report of the International Commission on Education for the 21st Century. Beograd: Ministarstvo prosvete Republike Srbije. [In Serbian]
Durkheim, E. (1981). Education and Sociology. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike [In Serbian]
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
Green, S. K. & Gredler, M. E. (2002). A review and analysis of constructivism for schoolbased practice. School Psychology Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 53–70.
Gresham, F. M. (1986). Conceptual issues in the assessment of social competence in children, In: P. S. Strain, M. J. Guralnick & H. M. Walker (Eds.) Children’s social behavior: development, assessment and modification. (215–284). Orlando: Academic press.
Gudjons, H. (1994). Pedagogy. Zagreb: Educa [In Croatian]
Hentig, H. (1997). A humane school, a school of thinking in a new way. Zagreb: Educa. [In Croatian]
Ivanović, S. (1997). Sociology and Education. Jagodina: Pedagoški fakultet. [In Serbian]
Jordan, A., O. Carlile & A. Stack (2008): Approaches to learning: a guide for teachers. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Katz, L. G., McClellan, D.E. (2005). Encouraging the development of children’s social competence. Zagreb: Educa. [In Croatian]
Knežević Florić, O. (2005). Pedagogy of development. Novi Sad: Faculty of Philosophy [In Serbian]
Knežević Florić, O. (2006). Assumptions of the theory of communicative action as a possible basis of pedagogical communication. In: Developing communication competences of teachers and students (88-95). Jagodina: Pedagoški fakultet; Kragujevac: Filološkoumetnički fakultet. [In Serbian]
Kovačević, Z., Blagdanić, S., Stojanović, A. (2021). Cooperative learning in the field of getting to know and understanding the world and in the teaching of nature and society, Inovacije u nastavi, 34(1), 14–29. DOI: 10.5937/inovacije2101014K [In Serbian]
Kovačević Lepojević M. M, Popović Ćitić. B. B., Bukvić Branković, L. S. (2021). Examining the relationship between socioemotional learning and positive youth development: a systematic review. Inovacije u nastavi, Vol. 34, No. 3, 110-123. DOI: 10.5937/inovacije2103110K [In Serbian]
Marković Savić, O. S., Bakić Mirić, N. M. (2022). Social and individual assumptions for intercultural communication. Sociološki pregled 56 (1), 189–209. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg56-36121
Milutinović, J. (2011). Social constructivism in the field of education and learning. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja. 43 (2), 177–194. DOI: 10.2298/ZIPI1102177M [In Serbian]
Mirkov, S. (2011). Constructivist paradigm and education for the knowledge society: progressive discourse in teaching. In: D. Golubović (ed.) Technology, informatics and education – for a society of learning and knowledge. Čačak: Technical Faculty. [In Serbian]
Nikolić, I. (2016). Competency approach to teaching nature and society. Beograd: Školska knjiga [In Serbian]
Nikolić, I. (2015). Roles of nature and society teachers in a rapidly changing school. Beograd: Školska knjiga [In Serbian]
Omerović, M. (2016). Methodology of teaching work – pedagogical decision-making power. Tuzla: OFF-SET. [In Serbian]
Palincsar, A.S. (1998): Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 49, 345–375.
Roeders, P. (2003). Interactive teaching: dynamics of effective learning and teaching. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet - Institut za pedagogiju i andragogiju. [In Serbian]
Sergeev, I. S. (2004). The Basics of Pedagogical Activities. Minsk. [In Russian]
Suzić, N. (2005). Pedagogy for the 21st century. Banja Luka: TT-centar. [In Serbian]
Šaljić, S., Hebib, E. (2021): Prevention of antisocial behaviour of students from the teacher’s perspective. Inovacije u nastavi, 34(2), 57–71. DOI: 10.5937/inovacije2102057S [In Serbian]
Šimić-Šašić, S. (2011). “Teacher-student interaction: Theories and measurement”. Psychological topics, 20 (2), 233–260. Univerzitet u Zadru. [In Croatian]
Šuvaković, U. (2020). A textbook is not a commodity or about the consequences of treating textbooks exclusively as a product that brings profit to the publisher. Godišnjak SAO za 2020, vol. XVI, 146–158. Available at: http://www.sao.org.rs/untitled_27.htm. [In Serbian]
Terwel, J. (1999): Constructivism and its implications for curriculum theory and practice, Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 31, No. 2, 195–199.
Trnavac, N. (2003). Three epochs and three theoretical conceptions of communication in school teaching. In: Communication and media (51-61). Jagodina: Pedagoški fakultet; Beograd: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja. [In Serbian]
Vilotijević, M., Mandić, D. (2016). Management of developmental changes in educational institutions. Beograd: Učiteljski fakultet. [In Serbian]
Vygotsky, L. S. (1996). Problems of general psychology. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva [In Serbian]
Windschitl, M. (1999). The challenges of sustaining a constructivist classroom culture. Phi Delta Kappan. 80 (10), 751–755.
Wine, J. D. & Smye, M. D. (1981). Social Competence. London: The Guilford Press.
Zukorlić, M. (2012). Improving communication in school. Beograd: Učiteljski fakultet. [In Serbian]
Zukorlić, M. (2016). Pedagogical communication in the function of developing social competence of students. Inovacije u nastavi, 29 (1), 92–104. DOI: 10.5937/inovacije1601092Z [In Serbian]

Objavljeno
2022/11/02
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Pregledni naučni rad