Geopolitika kao starija sestra geoekonomije i transformacija svetskog sistema u 21 veku
Sažetak
Predmet preduzetog istraživanja je analiza geopolitičkih i geoekonomskih promena u multipolarnom svetu 21. veka, koje dovode do transformacije svetskog sistema. U toku je evolucija geostrateške pozicije Sjedinjenih Američkih Država (SAD), uspon Kine, kao i podela sveta koja je nastupila sa ofanzivnim aktivnostima Rusije i ekspanzijom drugih zemalja poput Indije, Brazila, Saudijske Arabije. Cilj istraživanja je da se pored geopolitičke, kao bazične, istakne značaj geoekonomske komponente, kao izvedene, u međunarodnim odnosima, koja se najčešće manje jasno vidi iza mnogih međunarodnih konflikata i savezništava. Osnovna teza rada je da dominantne geostrateške sile poput SAD, Kine i Rusije prate svoje dugoročne geopolitičke i geoekonomske interese i ciljeve, što ih dovodi u konfliktne ili savezničke odnose, a što je opet zaslužno za konfiguraciju moći i odnos između velikih sila u areni svetske politike. U radu je korišćen multidisciplinarni kombinovani metod koji se bazira na političkim i ekonomskim naukama, te ponekad proučava šire geopolitičke procese, a ponekad se posvećuje užoj geoekonomskoj analizi pojedinačnih (geo)ekonomskih parametara.
Reference
Ciuriak, D. (2022). Geoeconomics in a Multipolar World: Rules of Engagement for the Small Open Economy. Policy Perspective.. May 25. Canadian Global Affairs Institute. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4095460
/>Cvetićanin, N. (2014). The welfare state as a synthesis between liberal and anti-liberal eco-nomic and social tendencies. In: V. Vukotić et al. (eds). (Anti)liberalism and economics, (149–163).. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka. [In Serbian]
Cvetićanin, N. (2016). Political Mechanics and Statecraft. Beograd: Arhipelag, Institut društvenih nauka. [In Serbian]
Cvetićanin, N. (2016). Statecraft of the Modern Age. Beograd: Arhipelag, Institut društvenih nauka. [In Serbian]
Cvetićanin, N. (2021). The European Union due to the global “geopolitical lockdown” and the beginning of the process of strategic reindustrialization of the EU. In: N. Stanković, D. Dabić, G. Bandov (eds.). Development directions of the European Union after the COVID-19 pandemic (77–92). Beograd: Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu. https://doi.org/10.18485/iipe_postkovid.2021.ch4. [In Serbian]
Clausewitz, C. (1951). About the war. Beograd: Vojnoizdavački centar. [In Serbian]
Maksimović, M. (2020). Management of human resources and sustainable development: green jobs. In: P. Jovanović and S. Stojković Zlatanović (eds.), Challenges of sustainable development in Serbia and the European Union (244–263). Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka. [In Serbian]
Maksimović, M. (2021).. Market Economy and Business Culture: Germany and Japan. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka. [In Serbian]
Maksimović, M. (2021a). International diplomacy and human resource management: economic diplomacy. Beograd: ECPD. [In Serbian]
Maksimović, M. (2022). COVID Capitalism and the Labour Market. Srpska politička misao, 76 (2), 55–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.22182/spm.7622022.3. [In Serbian]
Maksimović, M. T. and Cvetićanin, N. V. (2021). Geoeconomics and Entrepreneurship in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sociološki pregled, LV (3), 930–952. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg55-33257
Petrović, D. (2015). Serbian geopolitics in the Balkans, in the period of transition of the world order towards multipolarity. Kultura polisa 12 (3), 139–153. Special issue “Geopolitical Position of Serbia and the Balkans Between Euroatlaticism and Eurasinism”. Available at https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/1130/1077 [In Serbian]
Haushofer, K. (2016). About geopolitics: works of different years. Moscow: Thought. [In Russian]
Haushofer, K., Obst, E., Lautensach, H. (1928). Bausteine zur Geopolitik. Berlin – Grunewald.
A European Green Deal. (2023). Striving to be the first climate-neutral continent.. Available at: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-an-green-deal_en. (Accessed on January 5 2023)
Finance & Development [F&D]. 2022. Geo-economic Puzzle Policymaking in a More Fragmented World.. A Quarterly Publication of the International Monetary Fund. June, 59 (2).
Goldstone, R. P. (2007). Pax Mercatoria: Does Economic Interdependence Bring Peace? Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Center for international studies. August, 7–12. PSB 07-07-05. Available at: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/39786/Pax%20Mercatoria%20Does%20Economic%20Interdependence%20Bring%20Peace.pdf. (Accessed on October 30, 2022).
Gourinchas, P. O. (2022). Shifting Geopolitical Tectonic Plates. A more fragmented world will need the IMF more, not less. Finance & Development.. June, 59 (2), 10–11.
Ignatyeva, I. F., Isaev, B. А. (2018). Modern Trends in Geo-Economics and Geopolitics. In: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. International Conference on Communicative Strategies of Information Society (CSIS), Vol. 273, (515–518). Atlantis Press. DOI 10.2991/csis-18.2019.104
Isgandarov, A. (2022). Geoeconomics of Energy Trade by the European Union: the case of the Southern Gas Corridor. Vienna: Central European University, Department of International Relations, Austria
Koshino, Y. ,Ward, R. (2022). Japan’s Effectiveness as a Geo-economic Actor: Navigating Great-power Competition.. The International Institute for Strategic Studies – IISS, Routledge
Machiavelli, N. (2003). The Ruler. Beograd: PC Book. [In Serbian]
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2021). The Inevitable Rivalry America, China, and the Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Foreign Affairs.. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2021-10. (Accessed on January 27, 2022)
Merino, M. Á. L. (2021). Geopolitics under the green deal: a challenge for the EU. In: Energy and Geostrategy 2021, Chapter 2, 113–183. Spanish Institute for Strategic Studies, Spanish Committee of the World Energy Council, Spanish Energy Club, Ministry of Defence
Neves, M. S. (2017). Economic diplomacy, geo-economics and the external strategy of Portugal. E-journal of International Relations, JANUS.NET 8 (1) May–October, 88–118. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11144/3035, Lisbon, Portugal. (Accessed on August 28, 2020)
Perišić, S. (2022). Geopolitics and Serbs. Beograd: Filip Višnjić. [In Serbian]
Proroković, D. (2018) . Geopolitics of Serbia.. Position and perspectives at the beginning of the XXI century. Third supplemented edition. Beograd: Službeni glasnik [In Serbian]
Saalbach, K. P. (2017). Modern Geostrategy – Methods and Practice. Working Paper, (English Version) 02 Dec. 2017. Uuniversität Osnabrück. Available at: https://osnadocs.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:gbv:7002017121216405/5/Modern_Geostrategy_2017_Saalbach.pdf. (Accessed on October 29, 2022)
Scholvin, S., Wigell, M. (2018). Geo-economic power politics. In: M. Wigell, S. Scholvin, M. Aaltola (eds.), Geo-economics and Power Politics in the 21st Century.. GEOECONBOOK Ch. 1 (1–13). Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351172288-1/geo-econom-ic-power-politics-s%C3%B6ren-scholvin-mikael-wigell?context=ubx&refId=8d1f-c5ad-dd3d-4e34-9062-fe3f5604da19. (Accessed on October 29, 2022)
Scholvin, S., Wigell, M. (2018a). Geo-Economics as Concept and Practice in International Relations: Surveying the State. 27 April, Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FIIA). APRIL 102. Available at: https://css.ethz.ch/en/services/digital-library/articles/article.html/dd73604f-ffee-442-8960-4e. (Accessed on October 29, 2022)
Scholvin, S., Wigell, M. (2018b). Power Politics by Economic Means: Geo-economics as an Analytical Approach and Foreign Policy Practice. Comparative Strategy. February, DOI: 10.1080/01495933.2018.1419729
Stepić, M. (2016). Geopolitics – ideas, theories, concepts. Beograd: Institut za političke studije. [In Serbian]
Sun Tzu (1995). The Art of War. Novi Sad: Global Book. [In Serbian]
Tchakarova, V., Zinkanell, M., Satanakis, S. M., Schwarz, C. (2021). The Strategic Compass as Europe’s Defining Moment of Geostrategic Reorientation. Fokus 16. Vienna: Austria Institut für Europa-und Sicherheitspolitik.
TechPlomacy (technological-diplomacy). (2020). Office of Denmark’s Tech Ambassador Silicon Valley, Copenhagen, Beijing. Available at: https://techamb.um.dk/en/techplomacy/abouttechplomacy/. (Accessed on September 28, 2020)
Thirlwell, M. P. (2010). The Return of Geo-economics: Globalisation and National Security. The Lowy Institute for International Policy.. September. Available at: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/121234/Thirlwell,%20The%20return%20of%20geo-economics_web%20and%20print.pdf. (Accessed on October 30, 2022)
Tovy, T. (2015). The Changing Nature of Geostrategy 1900–2000, the Evolution of a New Paradigm.. December. Alabama: Institute Maxwell Air Force Base.
Yueh, L. (2020). “Economic Diplomacy in the 21st Century: Principles and Challenges”. LSE Ideas.. August. Available at: https://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/Assets/Documents/updates/LSE-IDEAS-EconomicDiplomacy-in-the-21st-Century.pdf. (Accessed on October 7, 2022)
Walton, D. C. (2007). Geopolitics and the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century, Multipolarity and the revolution in strategic perspective.. 1st Edition, Routledge.
Walsh, E. A. (1922). History and nature of international relations. New York. The Macmillan Company.
World Economic Forum [WEF]. (2015). Geo-economics: Seven Challenges to Globalization, Global Agenda Councils, Geopolitics vs.. Globalization: How Companies and States Can Become Winners in the Age of Geo-economics, by Mark Leonard. January. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Geoeconomics_7_Challenges_Globalization_2015_report.pdf. (Accessed on October 30, 2022)