Uticaj Vilsonovog shvatanja dihotomije na razvoj savremene javne administracije
Sažetak
Javna administracija je složen društveni fenomen, koji ima svoja sociološka, politikološka, pravna, organizaciona i druga obeležja. Samim tim, „ugao“ njenog posmatranja može biti veoma različit pa se zato i proučava u brojnim visokoškolskim ustanovama, kako u domenu politikologije, sociologije, prava i dr. Vudrou Vilson, nekadašnji predsednik SAD i dobitnik Nobelove nagrade, smatra se „rodonačelnikom“ naučnog pristupa administraciji. Vilson je u svom naučnom radu iz 1887. godine – „Studija o administraciji“ – ukazao na tri „dihotomije“ koje su povezane sa javnom upravom: (1) između politike i administracije; (2) između političkih i administrativnih nauka i (3) između političara i službenika. Vilson je tako pokrenuo čitav niz pitanja, koja su i danas predmet polemika i diskusija, a njegova naučna misao postala je trajna zaostavština i predmet proučavanja brojnih autora kako u teorijskoj tako i u praktičnoj analizi javne uprave koja i danas ima uticaj na njene promene i razvoj.
Reference
Brownlow, L. (1956). Woodrow Wilson and Public Administration, Public Administration Review, 16 (2), 77–81.
Dahlstrom, C. (2014). Politics and Administration, In: G. Peters, J. Pierre, The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration (2nd edition). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore: SAGE Publications Ltd.
De Almeida Fortis, M. F. (2014). Bringing politics and administration together: for an agonistic policy (Doctoral dissertation), London: University of Westminster. Fac-ulty of Social Sciences and Humanities. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/ pdf/161123093.pdf
Dimitrijević, P., Jovanović Rajs, A. (1966). Sciences of public administration – Basic. Niš: Studentsko privredno društvo Više upravne škole Niš. [In Serbian]
Hartley, J., Alford, J., Hughes, O. (2015). Political Astuteness as an Aid to Discerning and Creating Public Value, In: J. M. Bryson, B. C. Crosby & L. Bloomberg (eds.). Public Value and Public Administration, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 25–38.
Fayol, H. (1949). General and Industrial Management, London: Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons. Frederickson, G., Smith, K., Larimer, C., Licari, M. (2012), The Public Administration Theory Primer (2nd edition), Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Gulick, L. (1937). Notes on the Theory of organization. In: L. Gulick & L. Urwick (eds.). Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.
Guo, S. (2019). Political-Administrative Dichotomy: Its Sources, Logic and Debates. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2019, 7 (3), 356–368. Available at: https://www.scirp.org/ journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=91315
Kavran, D. (1991). Management science: organization, personnel and leadership. Beograd: Naučna knjiga. [In Serbian]
Lane, J-E. (2012). State Management. Beograd: Megatrend univerzitet, JP Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]
Lilić, S. (2008). Administrative law, Administrative-Procedural Law (1st edition). Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, JP Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]
Lilić, S. (2014). Administrative law, Administrative-Procedural Law (8th edition). Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, JP Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]
Mehl, L. (1957). La cybernetique et l’administration. La Revue administrative 10 (58), 410–419.
Milenković, D. (2019), Contemporary theories and modern administration. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka, Čigoja štampa. [In Serbian]
Overeem, P. (2005). The Value of the Dichotomy: Politics, Administration, and the Political Neutrality of Administrators. Administrative theory & Praxis, (27) 2, 311–329.
Overeem, P. (2006). In Defence of Dichotomy: A Response to James H. Svara. Administrative Theory and Praxis, (28) 1, 140–147.
Overeem, P. (2012). The Politics–Administration Dichotomy – Toward a Constitutional Per-spective (2nd edition), Boca Raton, London, New York: CRS Press – Taylor & Francis Group. Available at: http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/5397/1/22.pdf Piteres, G., Pierre, J. (2001). Civil Servants and Politicians: The Changing Balance, In: G. Peters & J. Pierre (eds.). Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform, London: Routledge, 1–10.
Peters, G. (2011). Bureaucracy and democracy – Towards result-based legitimacy?. In: J-M. Eymery-Douzans & Jon Pierre (eds.). Administrative Reforms and Democratic Govern-ance (109–120). New York: Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science.
Pusić, E. (1995). Modernization of administration – trades and durations. In: Eugen Pusić (ed.). Administrative Science (10–78). Zagreb: Naprijed [In Croatian]
Pusić, E. (2002). Science of administration (12th edition). Zagreb: Školska knjiga. [In Croatian]
Pavlović, V. (2009). Weber’s conception of power. Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 3(3), 9–26. [In Serbian]
Raadschelders, J. (2002). Woodrow Wilson on the History of Government: Passing Fad or Constitutive Framework for His Philosophy of Governance?. Administration & Society, 34 (5), 579–598.
Sardan, P. (2003). State Administration in France. In: M. Damjanović (ed.). Comparative Experiences of State Administrations (152–168). Beograd: Magna agenda. [In Serbian]
Şat, N. (2019). Woodrow Wilson “Тhe Study of Administration (Annotated)”. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/39225319/Woodrow_Wilson_Study_of_Administration_Annotated_by_NurSat
Shafritz, J. M., Russell, E. W., Borick, C. P., Hyde, A. C. (2017). Introducing Public Admin-istration (9th edition). New York: Routledge.
Simić, D. (2022). World Order – The Politics of Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Delano Roo-sevelt. Beograd: Clio. [In Serbian]
Simon, A. H. (1947) . Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. London: Macmillan Co. Available at: https://books. google.rs/books?hl=sr&lr=&id=_obn42iD3mYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=administra-tive+Behavior:+A+Study+of+Decision-Making+Processes+in+Administrative+Or-ganizations+(Macmillan+Co.,+1947)&ots=v-0q5wyhfY&sig=ADt-LmL4cqq5O1x-QQ54JY-1LGMs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Sager, F. & Rosser, C. (2009). Weber, Wilson, and Hegel: Theories of Modern Bureaucracy. Public administration review, 69 (6), 1136–1147.
Slomski, B. (2022). Darwin and American public administration – Woodrow Wilson’s Darwinian argument for administration. Politics and the life Science, 41 (1), 105–113.
Stančetić, V. (2015). Public administration reform – towards a new public administration. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka, Čigoja štampa. [In Serbian]
Stanimirović, D. (1977). Sociological thought of Max Weber. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 15 (1), 319–335. [In Serbian]
Svara, J. H. (2001) . The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Ad-ministration in the Past and Future of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 61 (2), 176–183.
Taylor, F. (1967). Principles of Scientific Management, Beograd: Rad. [In Serbian]
Urwick, L. (1937). Organization as a Technical problem. In: L. Gulick & L. Urwick (eds.). Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.
Uwizeyimana, D. (2013). The Politics-Administration Dichotomy: Was Woodrow Wilson Misunderstood or Misquoted?. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 10 (2). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280245552_The_Politics-Ad-ministration_Dichotomy_Was_Woodrow_Wilson_Misunderstood_or_Misquoted
Van Riper, P. (1983). The American administrative state: Wilson and the founders – An unorthodox view. Public Administration Review, vol. 44 (6), 477–490.
Weber, M. (1976). Economy and Society, Volume I. Beograd: Prosveta. [In Serbian]
Waldo, D. (1948). The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration, New York: The Ronald Press.
Waldo, D. (1990). A theory of public administration means in our time a theory of politics also. In: N. B. Lynn and A. Wildavsky (eds.). The State of the Discipline, Chatham, NY: Chatham House, 73–83.
Walker, L. (1989). Woodrow Wilson, Progressive Reform and Public Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 104 (3), 509–525.
Wiener, N. (1964). Cybernetics and Society, Beograd: Nolit. [In Serbian]
Wilson, W. (1885). Congressional Government – A Study in American Politics. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. The Riverside Press Cambridge. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/35861/pg35861-images.html#
Wilson, W. (1887). The Study of Administration, Political Science Quarterly, 2 (2), 197–222.