Prostorni identitet međunarodnih studenata i vezanost za grad
Sažetak
Pretpostavka ovog, u svim aspektima novog istraživanja u Srbiji, jeste da način na koji prostor utiče na identitet akademski mobilnih, međunarodnih studenata integriše deo njihovih individualnih identiteta, ali istovremeno utiče na varijabilnost identiteta poteklih iz različitih kontekstualnih faktora ishodišta studentskih migracija. Gradovi se mogu posmatrati kroz njihovu ulogu u oblikovanju i transformaciji identiteta međunarodnih studenata. Cilj je da se ispita emocionalna i pragmatična vezanost međunarodnih studenata za grad studiranja, uz poređenje sa ova dva oblika vezanosti za mesto iz kojeg potiču. Empirijska provera teorijskih postavki bazira se na kvalitativnom istraživanju putem fokus-grupnih intervjua sa tri predefinisane grupe ispitanika, čiji se rezultati prikazuju u radu, a u kasnijim fazama istraživanja dodatno će biti validirani u triangulaciji sa anketnim upitnicima i intervjuima kao komplementarnim istraživačkim tehnikama i pristupima.
Reference
Adams, R. E. (1992). A tale of Two Cities: Community Sentiments and Community Evaluation in Indianapolis and Pittsburgh. Sociological Focus, vol. 25, no. 3, 217–240.
Adriana, M. C., Situmorang, R., Aji, B. J. (2023). Exploring the transport mode choice of university students in Jakarta: A case study in Universitas Trisakti. SPATIUM, no. 49, June 2023, 20–29, https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT230202003A
Backović, V., Spasić, I. (2014). Place attachment and local identities: case studies of four cities in Serbia. Teme, XXXVIII, no. 1, 177–192. [In Serbian]
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., Robson, K. (2001). Focus Groups in Social Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209175
Brown, B. B., Perkins, D. D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. Human Behavior & Environment: Advances in Theory & Research, 12, 279–304, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_13
Bursać, B. (2009). A review of theoretical models for the city identity definition: Case-study of the City of Belgrade. Kultura, 122/123, 78–103. [In Serbian]
Džamić, L. (2014). A Flower-shop in the House of Flowers. How we adopted and lived the life of Alan Ford (4th edition). Smederevo: Heliks. [In Serbian]
Đurić, S. (2005). Methodology of focus group research. Sociologija, vol. XLVII, no. 1, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC0501001D [In Serbian]
Fischer, C. S., Jackson, R. M., Stueve, C. A., Gerson, K., Jones, L. M., Baldassare, M. (1977). Networks and places: Social relations in the urban setting. New York: Free Press.
Giuliani, M. V. (2003). Theory of attachment and place attachment. In: M. Bonnes, T. Lee, M. Bonaiuto (eds.). Psychological theories for environmental issues (137–170). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Glaeser, E. (2012). Triumph of the city. New York: The Penguin Press.
Hainard, F., Bassand, M., Perrenoud, M., Rossel, P. (1989). Animation, nouvelle technolo-gies et identite. L’Arc jurassien. Laussane, Neuchatel, IREC – Institute de Sociologie, quoted. In: Stojković, B. (2009). City as the framework of homeland identity. Kultura, br. 122/123, 45. [In Serbian]
Hernández, B., Hidalgo, M. C., Salazar-Laplace, M. E., Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 310–319, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003
Ignjatović, S. (2020). Qualitative applied research in social interventions and public policy programs: The case of focus group interviews. Sociologija, vol. LXII, no. 1, 42–62, https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC2001042I [In Serbian]
Israel, E., Cohen, N., Czamanski, D. (2019). Return on capital? Determinants of counter-mi-gration among early career Israeli STEM researchers. PLOS ONE, 14 (8): e0221882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221882
Kesić, D. B. (2023). “Smart” cities: the new paradigm of urban development. Sociološki pregled, vol. LVII (1), 32–52, doi: 10.5937/socpreg57-43015.
Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Krzysztofik, R., Kantor‐Pietraga, I., Spórna, T. (2020). Spatial and functional dimensions of the COVID‐19 epidemic in Poland. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 61 (4–5), 573–586, https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1783337
Kuckartz, U., Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA. Text, Audio, and Video. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/326762723.pdf
Lindner, R. (2006). The gestalt of the urban imaginary. European Studies: A Journal of European Culture, History and Politics, 23, 35–42.
Livingston, M., Bailey, N., Kearns, A. (2008). People’s Attachment to Place – The Influence of Neighbourhood Deprivation. York: Chartered Institute of Housing; Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Low, S., Altman, I. (1992). Introduction. In: I. Altman, S. Low (eds.). Place Attachment, 1–12. New York: Plenum Press.
Lukić, V. (2022) . Migration and Mobility Patterns in Serbia. In: E. Manić, V. Nikitović, P. Đurović (eds.) . The Geography of Serbia. World Regional Geography Book Series, 157–167. Cham: Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74701-5_12
Lukić, V., Predojević Despić, J. (2023). Reflections on Challenges and Opportunities of Comparative Qualitative Research of Migration during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Researcher Perspective. In: M. Radoman, A. Mirkov, D. Poleti Ćosić (eds.). Researching the Society during the Pandemic – Some Methodological Obstacles and Solutions (15–34). Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet. [In Serbian]
Mansell, I., Bennett, G., Northway, R., Mead, D., Moseley, L. (2004). The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection. Nurse Researcher, 11 (4), 79–88, https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2004.07.11.4.79.c6217
Miletić, D. S., Jeremić Marković, E. (2011). Migration of the population in Serbia as the chance and/or a threat under the conditions of World globalisation. In: V. Vukotić, S. Maksimović, V. Goati, D. Šuković, V. Radovanović (eds.). Population and develop-ment (185–193). Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka. [In Serbian]
Mirkov, A. (2013). Attachment to place of residence among citizens of Serbia: Emotions and common interests. In: M. Lazić, S. Cvejić (eds.). The changes of basic structures of the society in Serbia in the period of accelerated transformation (307–319). Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu. [In Serbian]
Morgan, D. L., Krueger, R. A. (1993). When to Use Focus Groups and Why. In: D. L. Morgan (ed.). Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art, 3–19. Newbury Park, California 91320: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349008
Ng, C. (1998). Canada as a new place: the immigrant’s experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1997.0065
Nzimande, N. P. (2022). Residential satisfaction in large housing estates of Budapest: Is age really just a number? SPATIUM, no. 48, December 2022. 11–21, https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT220502010N
Parker, K. A., Hester, E. B., Geegan, S. A., Ciunova-Shuleska, A., Palamidovska-Sterjadovska, N., Ivanov, B. (2022). Reflections on the Emigration Aspirations of Young, Educated People in Small Balkan Countries: A Qualitative Analysis of Reasons to Leave or Stay in North Macedonia. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, vol. 11, no. 1, 69–84. https://doi.org/10.54667/ceemr.2022.07
Petrić, J. (2017). Neighbourhood Attachment in Central and Peripheral Areas of Belgrade: Evidence from Stari grad and Kaluđerica. ANNALES, Series Historia et Sociologica, 27, 2017, 2, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.19233/ASHS.2017.20
Perez-Encinas, A., Rodriguez-Pomeda, J. (2019). Geographies and Cultures of International Student Experiences in Higher Education: Shared Perspectives Between Students from Different Countries. Journal of International Students, vol. 9, Issue 2, 412–431. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v9i2.271
Pušić, Lj. (2007). Writing of a city – Urban contemporariness. Novi Sad: Prometej. [In Serbian]
Radović, S. (2013). City as a text. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek. [In Serbian]
Radusinović, D., Vukčević, M., Čizmić, S. (2012). Difference in Place Attachment between Students in Helsinki and in Belgrade. Psihološka istraživanja, vol. XV (2), 135–151. [In Serbian]
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
Salazar, N. B. (2023). Mobile places and emplaced mobilities: problematizing the place-mo-bility nexus. Mobilities, vol. 18, Issue 4, 582–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2023.2226358
Skoko, B., Benković, V. (2009). Scientific method of focus groups – possibilities and ways of application. Politička misao, 46 (3), 217–236. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/50954 [In Croatian]
Sokołowicz, М. Е. (2019). Student cities or cities of graduates? The case of Lodz and its students declared preferences. Popul Space Place. 25:e2177. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2177
Spasić, I., Backović. V. (2017). Cities in Search of Identity. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Filozofski fakultet, Institut za sociološka istraživanja. [In Serbian]
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (RZS) (2023). Migrations – Data for municipalities and towns, 2022 Census, Book 7. Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku. Available at: https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2023/Pdf/G20234010.pdf [In Serbian]
Stojkov, B. (2002). Spatial planning methods. Beograd: Geografski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu. [In Serbian]
Stojković, B. (2009). City as the framework of homeland identity. Kultura, br. 122/123, 41–53. [In Serbian]
Vujović, S. (2014). Sociospacial Identity of Belgrade in the Context of Urban and Regional Development of Serbia. Sociologija, vol. LVI (2014), no. 2, 145–166. DOI: 10.2298/SOC1402145V [In Serbian]
Wee, A. (2019). Space and Identity Construction: A Study of Female Singaporean Undergraduates in the UK. Journal of International Students, vol. 9, Issue 2, 384–411. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1222455.pdf
Zasina, J., Nowakowska, A. (2023). Is the ‘student city’ lost? The rhythms of Lodz as a con-sumption-oriented student city through the COVID-19 pandemic lens. Population, Space and Place, 29, e2607. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2607