Obrazovna dimenzija sudske samouprave u funkciji ostvarivanja načela nezavisnosti sudske vlasti: slučaj Srbije u procesu evropskih integracija

Ana Knežević Bojović; Vesna Ćorić

doi:10.5937/socpreg58-47647

Ana S. Knežević Bojović Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd (Srbija) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3746-5747
Vesna B. Ćorić Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd (Srbija) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4240-7469

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg58-47647

Ključne reči: vladavina prava, nezavisnost, stručnost, sudije, Evropska unija

Sažetak

Vladavina prava okosnica je demokratskog društva i procesa pristupanja Evropskoj uniji. Nezavisno sudstvo je važan element vladavine prava, a stručnost i ostvarivanje koncepta sudske samouprave jedan od njegovih činilaca. Jedna od dimenzija sudske samouprave je i obrazovna dimenzija. U radu se primenom normativno-dogmatskog, egezetičkog i empirijsko-pravnog metoda ispituje u kojoj meri su zahtevi za ispunjavanje prelaznih merila iz Poglavlja 23 postavljeni u skladu sa izbalansiranim pristupom načelu sudske samouprave, kao i način na koji je ona sprovedena u praksi prilikom izrade višegodišnjeg radnog plana Pravosudne akademije. Zaključuje se da je proces izrade ovog plana adekvatna platforma kojom se uvažava navedeni koncept, a da sam program može doprineti unapređenju stručnosti i, posledično, nezavisnosti sudstva.

Reference

Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary, adopted on 6 September 1985 by the Seventh United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders held at Milan from 26 August to 6 September 1985

Bingham, T. (2010). The Rule of Law.. London: Penguin Books.

Consultative Council of European Judges. Magna Carta of judges CCJE (2010) 3 Final

Consultative Council of European Judges Opinion No. 4 on appropriate initial and in-service training for judges at national and European levels

Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, Recommendation CM/Rec (2010) 12 on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities

Council of the European Union, European Union common position on Judiciary and fundamental rights, Brussels, 5. 7. 2016, 10074/16

Ćirić, J., Đorđević, M. (2022). A Look on Constitutional Changes in the Sphere of Judiciary. In: V. Turanjanin, D. Čvorović (eds.). Non-institutional Measures, Simplified Forms of Action and other Criminal Law Instruments of Reacting to Criminality and Positive Penal Legislation, 73–82.. Beograd: Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu; INTERMEX – Beograd. [In Serbian]

Ćorić, V., Knežević Bojović, A. (2019). Framing an Improved Model of Judicial Reform in Aspiring Member States of the European Union.. European Journal of Transformation Studies, vol. 7 (2), 211–220. Available at: https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/ journal-transformation/article/view/5021

EJTN (2016). EJTN Handbook on Judicial Training Methodology in Europe.

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). Report on the Rule of Law Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th Plenary Session (Venice, 25–26 March 2011) CDL-AD(2011)003rev. Available at https://rm.coe.int/1680700a61 https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamen-tal-rights/upholding-rule-law/eu-justice-scoreboard_en

Ilić, G. P. (2018). Critical Considerations of the Working text of the Ministry of Justice Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia. Sideways in Interpretations of International Documents. Sveske za javno pravo, 31/2018, 19–26. [In Serbian]

Indicators Independence, Accountability and Quality of the Judiciary. Reenforcing Judicial Protection. ENCJ Report 2022–2023. Available at: /https://pgwrk-websitemedia. s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/production/pwk-web-encj2017-p/GA%20Ljubljana/ ENCJ%20Report%20Indicators%20IAQ%202022-2023%2025%20May%202023%20 with%20links.pdf

Judicial Academy Continuous Training Programme for 2022. Available at: https://www.pars.rs/images/dokumenta/Stalna-obuka/program-stalne-obuke-za-2022.pdf.

Regulation on Methodology for Development of Mid-term Plans, RS Official Gazette [In Serbian]

Knežević Bojović, A., Ćorić, V. (2023). Challenges of the Rule of Law Conditionality in EU Accession.. Bratislava Law Review, 7 (1), 41–62. Available at: https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/ index.php/BLR/article/view/327

Knežević Bojović, A., Ćorić, V. (2022). Rule of Law as a Challenge in Principle and Selected Examples from the Judicial Sector in Serbia.. In: J. Ćeranić Perišić, V. Đurić, A. Višekruna (eds.). 65 Years since the Rome Treaties: European Union and Perspectives of Serbia’s European Integration, 51–72. Beograd: Institut za uporedno pravo. Available at: / http://ricl.iup.rs/1666/1/2022%20-%2065%20godina%20Rimskih%20ugovora%20 -%20Knežević%20Bojović%2C%20Ćorić.pdf [In Serbian]

Kosar, D., Šipulova, K. (2020). How to Fight Court-Packing. Constitutional Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, 133–164.

Law on Judges, RS Official Gazette no. 10/2023 [In Serbian]

Law on the High Judicial Council, RS Official Gazette no. 10/2023 [In Serbian]

Law on the Judicial Academy, RS Official Gazette no. 104/2009, 32/2014 – Constitutional Court decision and 106/2015 [In Serbian]

Law on the Planning System of the Republic of Serbia. RS Official Gazette no. 30/2018) [In Serbian]

Minutes from the Meeting of the Judicial Academy Programme Council of 25.8.2022. Available at: https://www.pars.rs/images/dokumenta/2022-godina/Programski-savet/ Zapisnik-sa-prve-sednice.pdf) [In Serbian]

Pech, L. (2022). The Rule of Law as a Well Established and Well-Defined Principle of EU Law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, vol. 14, 107–138.

Petrov, V. (2014). Proposals for Constitutional Reform in the Part Pertaining to Judiciary – a Re-examination of the National Strategy. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 68, 97–108 [In Serbian]

Purić, O., Knežević Bojović, A. (2016). Creation of Educational Policy in Serbian Judiciary and Influence of the European Union. Politička revija, 4, 75–92. Available at: https:// www.ips.ac.rs/publications/kreiranje-obrazovne-politike-u-pravosudju-srbije-i-uti-caj-evropske-unije/ [In Serbian]

Regulation on Methodology for Development of Mid-term Plans, RS Official Gazette [In Serbian]

Republican Public Policy Secretariat. Handbook for Drafting a Mid-term Plan, February 2020 Available at: https://rsjp.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/Prirucnik-za-izradu-srednjorocnih-planova-09032020.pdf [In Serbian].

Revised Action Plan for Chapter 23, Government of the Republic of Serbia, Judiciary and Fundamental Rights, July 2020 [In Serbian]

Revised Action Plan for Chapter 24 Justice, Freedom and Security, Government of the Republic of Serbia, July 2020 [In Serbian]

Rulebook on the Procedure for Establishing Training Needs and Development of Draft Annual Training Programme [In Serbian]

Stein, R. (2009). Rule of Law: What Does It Mean? Minnesota Journal of International Law. 293–303. Available at: /https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?arti-cle=1428&context=faculty_articles

Šipulova, K. et al. (2023). Judicial Self-Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary. Regulation & Governance, vol. 17, 22–42.

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2012). The History and Elements of the Rule of Law. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 232–247.

The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- Conflict Societies: Report of the Secretary General, UN SC, UN Doc. S/2004/616 at 4/3

Van Dijk, F. et al. (2016). Independence of judges: judicial perceptions and formal safeguards, 2016, Working Paper January 2016, nr 1, De Rechtspraak.

Vuković, D., Babović, M. (2014). Social Interests, Policy Networks, and Legislative Outcomes: The Role of Policy Networks in Shaping Welfare and Employment Policies in Serbia. East European Politics and Societies, 28 (1), 5–24.

Working Text of the Ministry of Justice Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia. Available at: https://www.mpravde.gov.rs/obavestenje/20887/rad-ni-tekst-ustavnih-amandmana-u-oblasti-pravosudja-uskladjen-sa-preporuka-ma-venecijanske-komisije.php [In Serbian]