Pogled na suburbanizaciju iz ugla životnog toka
Sažetak
Ovaj rad istražuje dinamiku migracija iz grada u prigradska područja u okviru šireg gradskog područja Budimpešte, u okviru pristupa životnog toka. Prema ovom pristupu, životni događaji i prethodna rezidencijalna iskustva oblikuju odluke pojedinaca o migraciji, sa fokusom na međusobnu povezanost rezidencijalnih iskustava. Rezultati, zasnovani na polustrukturisanim intervjuima, ispituju motivacije i očekivanja novih stanovnika u prigradskom području u pogledu novog prebivališta. Glavni pokretači migracija u prigradska područja su odgajanje dece i život u prijatnijem životnom okruženju, sa uslovima koji su slični ruralnom okruženju iz detinjstva. Osim toga, ispostavilo se da su finansijska ograničenja i cene nekretnina u Budimpešti, u poređenju sa prigradskim područjima, takođe značajni činioci.
Reference
Bailey, A. J. (2009). Population geography: Lifecourse matters. Progress in Human Geography, 33 (3), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508096355
Barta, G., Beluszky, P. (1999). Preliminary comments on the relationship between cities and their agglomeration. In: G. Barta & P. Beluszky (еds.). Társadalmi – gazdasági átalakulás a budapesti agglomerációban I. (pp. 225–241). Regionális Kutatási Alapítvány.
Bootsma, H. G. (1995). The influence of a work-oriented life style on residential location choice of couples. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 10, 45–63.
Brinszkyné Hidas Zsuzsanna. (2006). Népesedési folyamatok a budapesti agglomerációban. KSH.
Bruegmann, R. (2005). Sprawl: A Compact History. The University of Chicago Press.
Coulter, R., Scott, J. (2015). What Motivates Residential Mobility? Re-examining Self-Reported Reasons for Desiring and Making Residential Moves: Reasons for Desiring and Making Residential Moves. Population, Space and Place, 21 (4), 354–371. https:// doi.org/10.1002/psp.1863
Courgeau, D. (1995). Migration theories and behavioural models. International Journal of Population Geography, 1 (1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijpg.6060010103
Csanádi, G. (еd.). (2010). Város, tervező, társadalom. Sík K.
Csanádi, G., Csizmady, A. (2002). Szuburbanizáció és társadalom. Tér És Társadalom, 16(3), 27–55.
Csanádi, G., Csizmady, A., Kocsis, J. B., Kőszeghy, L., Tomay, K. (2010). Város, tervező, társadalom. Sík Kiadó.
Csurgó, B. (2013). Vidéken lakni és vidéken élni: A városból vidékre költözők hatása a vidék átalakulására: a város környéki vidék. Argumentum.
Dövényi, Z., Kovács, Z. (1999). A szuburbanizáció térbeni-társadalmi jellemzői Budapest környékén. Földrajzi Értesítő, 48 (1–2), 33–57.
Dövényi, Z., Kovacs, Z., Herman, K. (1998). A szuburbanizáció, a lokális társadalom és a helyi önkormányzati politika összefüggései a budapesti agglomerációban. In: S. Illés & P. P. Tóth (еds.). Migráció I (pp. 229–237). KSH Népességtudományi Kutató Intézet.
Ekers, M., Hamel, P., Keil, R. (2012). Governing Suburbia: Modalities and Mechanisms of Suburban Governance. Regional Studies, 46 (3), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.658036
Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R. (2003). The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory. In: J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (eds.). Handbook of the Life Course (pp. 3–19). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48247-2_1
Feijten, P., Hooimeijer, P., Mulder, C. H. (2008). Residential Experience and Residential Environment Choice over the Life-course. Urban Studies, 45 (1), 141–162. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0042098007085105
Gardner, K. (2009). Lives in Motion: The Life-Course, Movement and Migration in Bangladesh. Journal of South Asian Development, 4 (2), 229–251. https://doi. org/10.1177/097317410900400204
Gkartzios, M., Scott, M. (2010). Residential Mobilities and House Building in Rural Ireland: Evidence from Three Case Studies: Residential mobilities and rural housing. Sociologia Ruralis, 50 (1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00502.x
Haartsen, T., Thissen, F. (2014). The success–failure dichotomy revisited: Young adults’ motives to return to their rural home region. Children’s Geographies, 12 (1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.850848
Hareven, T. K. (2018). Families, History, and Social Change: Life-Course and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500572
HCSO (2014). Migráció és lakáspiac a budapesti agglomerációban.
Hedman, L. (2013). Moving Near Family? The Influence of Extended Family on Neighbourhood Choice in an Intra-urban Context: Moving Near Family? Population, Space and Place, 19 (1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1703
Heinz, W. R., Huinink, J., Weymann, A. & Swader, C. (2009). The life course reader: Individuals and societies across time. Campus Verlag.
Hirt, S. (2007). Suburbanizing Sofia: Characteristics of post-socialist peri-urban change. Urban Geography, 28 (8), 755–780. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.28.8.755
Jansen, S. J. T. (2020). Urban, suburban or rural? Understanding preferences for the residential environment. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 13 (2), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2020.1726797
Kährik, A., Temelová, J., Kadarik, K., Kubeš, J. (2016). What attracts people to inner city areas? The cases of two post-socialist cities in Estonia and the Czech Republic. Urban Studies, 53 (2), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014567444
Keserű, I. (2012). Bejárók és eljárók: A szuburbanizáció és az általános iskolások ingázásának összefüggéesi Budapest funkcionális várostérségében. Tér És Társadalom, 26 (3), 114–131
Kley, S. A., Mulder, C. H. (2010). Considering, planning, and realizing migration in early adulthood. The influence of life-course events and perceived opportunities on leaving the city in Germany. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25 (1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-009-9167-8
Kovács, Z., Farkas, Z. J., Egedy, T., Kondor, A. C., Szabó, B., Lennert, J., Baka, D., Kohán,B. (2019). Urban sprawl and land conversion in post-socialist cities: The case of metropolitan Budapest. Cities, 92, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.018
Kovács, Z., Harangozó, G., Szigeti, C., Koppány, K., Kondor, A. C. & Szabó, B. (2020). Measuring the impacts of suburbanization with ecological footprint calculations. Cities, 101, 102715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102715
Kovács, Z., Tosics, I. (2014). Urban Sprawl on the Danube. The Impacts of Suburbanization in Budapest. In: K. Stanilov & L. Sýkora (eds.). Confronting Suburbanization: Urban Decentralization in Postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 33–64). Wiley.
Krisjane, Z., Berzins, M. (2012). Post-socialist Urban Trends: New Patterns and Motivations for Migration in the Suburban Areas of Rīga, Latvia. Urban Studies, 49(2), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011402232
Kulu, H. (2008). Fertility and Spatial Mobility in the Life Course: Evidence from Austria. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40 (3), 632–652. https://doi. org/10.1068/a3914
Lisowski, A., Mantey, D., Wilk, W. (2014). Lessons from Warsaw: The Lack of Coordinated Planning and Its Impacts on Urban Sprawl. In: K. Stanilov & L. Sýkora (eds.). Confronting Suburbanization (pp. 225–255). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118295861.ch8.
Mayer, K. U. (2009). New Directions in Life Course Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 35 (1), 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134619
Mieszkowski, P. & Mills, E. S. (1993). The Causes of Metropolitan Suburbanization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.3.135
Ní Laoire, C. (2008). ‘Settling back’? A biographical and life-course perspective on Ireland’s recent return migration. Irish Geography, 41 (2), 195–210. https://doi. org/10.1080/00750770802076968
Niedomysl, T., Amcoff, J. (2011). Why return migrants return: Survey evidence on motives for internal return migration in Sweden: Why Return Migrants Return. Population, Space and Place, 17 (5), 656–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.644
Nowok, B., Findlay, A., McCollum, D. (2018) . Linking residential relocation desires and behaviour with life domain satisfaction. Urban Studies, 55 (4), 870–890. https://doi. org/10.1177/0042098016665972
Pálné Kovács, I. (2021). Politics without meso-level? No politics at the meso? Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 694260. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.694260
Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility. Free Press.
Scott, M., Murphy, E., Gkartzios, M. (2017). Placing ‘Home’ and ‘Family’ in Rural Residential Mobilities: R ural residential mobilities. Sociologia Ruralis, 57, 598–621. https:// doi.org/10.1111/soru.12165
South, S. J., Crowder, K. D. (1997). Residential mobility between cities and suburbs: Race, suburbanization, and back-to-the-city moves. Demography, 34 (4), 525–538. https:// doi.org/10.2307/3038307
Stanilov, K., Hirt, S. (2014). Sprawling Sofia: Postsocialist Suburban Growth in the Bulgarian Capital. In: K. Stanilov & L. Sýkora (eds.). Confronting Suburbanization (pp. 163–191). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118295861.ch6
Stanilov, K., Sýkora, L. (2014). Postsocialist Suburbanization Patterns and Dynamics. In: Confronting Suburbanization (pp. 256–295). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118295861.ch9
Stockdale, A., Catney, G. (2014). A Life Course Perspective on Urban-Rural Migration: The Importance of the Local Context: A Life Course Perspective on Urban-Rural Migration. Population, Space and Place, 20 (1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1758
Stockdale, A., MacLeod, M., Philip, L. (2013). Connected Life Courses: Influences on and Experiences of ‘Midlife’ In-Migration to Rural Areas: Connected Life Courses. Population, Space and Place, 19 (3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1709
Stone, J., Berrington, A., Falkingham, J. (2014). Gender, Turning Points, and Boomerangs:
Returning Home in Young Adulthood in Great Britain. Demography, 51 (1), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0247-8
Ströbele, M., Hunziker, M. (2017). Are suburbs perceived as rural villages? Landscape-related residential preferences in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 163, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.015
Szirmai, V. (2019). Városok és városlakók: A befogadó és kirekesztő városok. Corvina Kiadó: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont.
Timár, J. (1999). Elméleti kérdések a szuburbanizációról. Földrajzi Értesítő, XLV 3 (1–2), 7–31.
Warnes, A. (1992). Age-related variation and temporal change in elderly migration. In: A.
Rogers (ed.). Elderly Migration and Population Redistribution: A Comparative Study (pp. 33–55). Belhaven Press.
Wolf, T., Meyer, B. C. (2010). Suburban scenario development based on multiple landscape assessments. Ecological Indicators, 10 (1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.012.
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2024 Sociološki pregled
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 međunarodnom licencom.